IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6956-d1714489.html

Scale and Determinants of Non-Agricultural Business Activity Among Farmers in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Ryszard Kata

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Wosiek

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Brelik

    (Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Non-agricultural business activity of farmers is crucial not only for stabilizing farm income but also for the multifunctional development of rural areas. Capturing changes in the level and nature of this activity supports the development of sustainable agricultural and rural policy. In this context, this study aimed to identify the scale and types of non-agricultural business activity and to recognize the main determinants of such business activities undertaken by farmers in Poland between 2002 and 2022. Sectoral-level data from the Agricultural Censuses and cyclical studies of the structure of farms and household budgets were used to approximate underlying motivations for running non-agricultural business (opportunity vs. necessity entrepreneurship). The findings indicate that, in Poland, the impact of regressive factors remains strong, pushing farmers to take on additional business activity due to the large share of small and very small farms. However, during the 21st century, a gradual spread of opportunity entrepreneurship among Polish farmers has been observed. This study highlights the rationale for supporting non-agriculture business activity motivated by progressive factors to increase the income resilience of farmer households and the sustainable development of agriculture. The article indicates the need for further research on the motives for undertaking non-agricultural economic activities by farmers and the impact of this activity on the allocation of farm resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryszard Kata & Małgorzata Wosiek & Agnieszka Brelik, 2025. "Scale and Determinants of Non-Agricultural Business Activity Among Farmers in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6956-:d:1714489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Wosiek & Adam Czudec & Ryszard Kata, 2022. "Relationship between unemployment and new business registrations at the local level: the case of Poland," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 1083-1108, November.
    2. Viktoria Graskemper & Xiaohua Yu & Jan‐Henning Feil, 2021. "Analyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture—Empirical evidence from Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 569-589, July.
    3. Yasuo Ohe, 2020. "Community-based Rural Tourism and Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-15-0383-2, March.
    4. Bożena Kusz & Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Maciej Oesterreich & Ludwik Wicki & Grzegorz Zimon, 2022. "Selected Economic Determinants of Labor Profitability in Family Farms in Poland in Relation to Economic Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Konon, Alexander & Fritsch, Michael & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2018. "Business cycles and start-ups across industries: An empirical analysis of German regions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 33(6), pages 742-761.
    6. Sarah Fitz-Koch & Mattias Nordqvist & Sara Carter & Erik Hunter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 129-166, January.
    7. Franziska Sohns & Javier Revilla Diez, 2018. "Explaining micro entrepreneurship in rural Vietnam—a multilevel analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 219-237, January.
    8. Erika Quendler & Mangirdas Morkūnas, 2020. "The Economic Resilience of the Austrian Agriculture since the EU Accession," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Rigg, Jonathan, 2006. "Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 180-202, January.
    10. Ryszard Kata & Małgorzata Wosiek, 2024. "Income Variability of Agricultural Households in Poland: A Descriptive Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Concetta Cardillo & Orlando Cimino, 2022. "Small Farms in Italy: What Is Their Impact on the Sustainability of Rural Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Parzonko & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Marta Czekaj & Renata Płonka & Anna Justyna Parzonko, 2025. "Remuneration for Own Labour in Family-Run Dairy Farms Versus the Salaries and Wages in Non-Agricultural Sectors of the Economy—Evaluation of the Situation in Poland in 2005–2022," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Małgorzata Wosiek, 2023. "Unemployment and Enterprise Births in European Countries: A Sectoral Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Adam Henryk Kagan, 2025. "Change in Productivity as the Primary Determinant of the Income of Agriculture After Poland’s Integration into the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    5. Evaristo Haulle & Credo Simbert Nchimbi & Gabriel Kanuti Ndimbo, 2024. "Engendering Rural Tourism as a Viable Strategy for Poverty Alleviation and Rural Development in the Southern Tourist Circuit of Tanzania," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    6. Alexis Zickafoose & Gary Wingenbach & Matt Baker & Edwin Price, 2023. "Developing Youth Agricultural Entrepreneurship in Latin America and the Caribbean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    8. Yen H. T. Nguyen & Tuyen Q. Tran & Dung T. Hoang & Thu M. T. Tran & Trung T. Nguyen, 2023. "Land quality, income, and poverty among rural households in the North Central Region, Vietnam," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 150-172, June.
    9. Bazyli Czyżewski & Jakub Staniszewski & Joanna Staniszewska & Marta Guth, 2025. "Does Increasing Agricultural Efficiency Contribute to Food Security—Trade‐Offs of Value Addition in Crop Production?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 939-970, November.
    10. Bojan Đerčan & Dragica Gatarić & Milka Bubalo Živković & Marija Belij Radin & Danijela Vukoičić & Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski & Tamara Lukić & Petar Vasić & Milena Nikolić & Miloš Lutovac & Milena Lutova, 2023. "Evaluating Farm Tourism Development for Sustainability: A Case Study of Farms in the Peri-Urban Area of Novi Sad (Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Daniela Sorea & Codrina Csesznek & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Culture-Centered Development Potential of Communities in Făgăraș Land (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    12. Greeni Maheshwari & Khanh Linh Kha & Anantha Raj A. Arokiasamy, 2023. "Factors affecting students’ entrepreneurial intentions: a systematic review (2005–2022) for future directions in theory and practice," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1903-1970, December.
    13. repec:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:6:p:183-193 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Galina Shirokova & Nailya Galieva & Joshua V. White & Diana Doktorova, 2024. "Narcissism, workaholism, family support and new venture performance: a moderated mediation model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 379-419, June.
    15. Robert W. Fairlie & Frank M. Fossen, 2020. "Defining Opportunity versus Necessity Entrepreneurship: Two Components of Business Creation," Research in Labor Economics, in: Change at Home, in the Labor Market, and On the Job, volume 48, pages 253-289, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    16. Luis Felipe Dias Lopes & Silvana Bortoluzzi Balconi & Raquel Dalvit Flores & Martiele Gon?alves Moreira & Deocl?cio Junior Cardoso da Silva & Rayssa Cleide de Oliveira & Daniela Pegoraro & Gilnei Luiz, 2025. "Innovative behavior of family farmers in Brazil in the face of innovations in the agricultural sector," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 103-133.
    17. Yin Wang & Dian Min & Wenli Ye & Kongsen Wu & Xinjun Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Rural Location on Farmers’ Livelihood in the Loess Plateau: Local, Urban–Rural, and Interconnected Multi-Spatial Perspective Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Matthys, Marie-Luise & Acharya, Sushant & Khatri, Sanjaya, 2021. "“Before cardamom, we used to face hardship”: Analyzing agricultural commercialization effects in Nepal through a local concept of the Good Life," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Scott, Lucy, 2014. "Transfers for extreme poverty reduction: Implications for patron-client relationships in the context of Bangladesh's agricultural reformation," WIDER Working Paper Series 029, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Sharina Shariff & Siti ‘Aisyah Baharudin & Nor Asmat Ismail, 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Agriculture Economic Sector in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(1), pages 285-303.
    21. Bir Chhetri & Helle Larsen & Carsten Smith-Hall, 2015. "Environmental resources reduce income inequality and the prevalence, depth and severity of poverty in rural Nepal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 513-530, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6956-:d:1714489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.