IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/401371.html

Assessment of the impact of factors on the yield of strategic crops in Ukraine under climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Strapchuk, Olena
  • Manaloor, Varghese
  • Strapchuk, Svitlana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to provide a quantitative assessment of how climatic, agroecological, technological, and economic factors have influenced the yields of Ukraine’s strategic crops (wheat, sunflower, and corn) over the 2002–2023 period. Methodology. The study is based on a three-stage approach involving trend analysis (evaluation of volatility and long-term patterns), correlation analysis (identification of relationships and their strength), and construction of multiple linear regression models. According to the IPCC AR6 methodology, these models identify the influence of the following factors: climatic (temperature during the growing season, annual precipitation), agroecological (volume of greenhouse gas emissions, livestock population), technological (volume of organic and mineral fertilisers applied) and economic (sales prices of the previous year). Results. A stable positive dynamic of the yield of all three crops was revealed during 2002–2023: the average annual increase was 0.0706 t/ha for sunflowers (R² = 0.863), 0.0827 t/ha for wheat (R² = 0.663), and 0.1937 t/ha for corn (R² = 0.776). A strong positive correlation was found between yield and mineral fertiliser application per hectare for sunflowers (r = 0.838) and corn (r = 0.828), as well as with greenhouse gas emissions for all crops (r = 0.688–0.725). The relationship between climatic factors and yield was statistically insignificant or weak for most of the studied crops. GHG is a statistically significant determinant of yield for all studied crops (p = 0.006–0.011), confirming the dominance of technological intensification. A systemic gap was identified between the crop and livestock sectors due to a strong negative correlation between yields and cattle population (ranging from -0.74 to -0.90), indicating soil degradation in terms of organic matter content. A significant impact of organic fertilisers on wheat yield was recorded (p = 0.03). Originality. The study substantiates that technological progress and adaptation measures in Ukraine’s agricultural sector have partially mitigated the impact of climate variability on the yields of wheat, sunflower, and corn. Based on a quantitative assessment of factor influences, a novel agroecosystem management framework is proposed. This framework classifies crops according to their response to anthropogenic load into two distinct categories: the ‘energy-intensive growth group’ (corn and sunflower) and the ‘resistance group’ (wheat). Practical implications. The findings serve as a basis for developing adaptive strategies: transition to precision agriculture to optimise resource use and increase yields, breeding for drought resistance, and mandatory restoration of livestock farming based on the principles of a circular economy to improve soil fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Strapchuk, Olena & Manaloor, Varghese & Strapchuk, Svitlana, 2026. "Assessment of the impact of factors on the yield of strategic crops in Ukraine under climate change," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401371
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401371/files/9_Strapchuk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asif Warsi & Dr. Amena Sibghatullah & Dr. Athar Iqbal, 2019. "Empirics Of Agricultural Production: Comparison Of Instrumental Variable And Two Stage Least Square Approach," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(2), pages 15-15.
    2. A. J. Challinor & J. Watson & D. B. Lobell & S. M. Howden & D. R. Smith & N. Chhetri, 2014. "A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 287-291, April.
    3. Manaloor, Varghese, 2006. "CO2 Emissions from Central Canadian Agriculture: Meeting Kyoto Targets and Its Implications," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25778, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. S. Asseng & F. Ewert & P. Martre & R. P. Rötter & D. B. Lobell & D. Cammarano & B. A. Kimball & M. J. Ottman & G. W. Wall & J. W. White & M. P. Reynolds & P. D. Alderman & P. V. V. Prasad & P. K. Agga, 2015. "Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 143-147, February.
    5. Chygryn, Olena & Hrytsenko, Kostiantyn & Starchenko, Liudmyla & Lebid, Vadym, 2025. "Modelling the impact of biogas production capacity and industrial determinants on electricity consumption in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.
    6. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    7. Yan He & Yanxia Zhao & Shao Sun & Jiayi Fang & Yi Zhang & Qing Sun & Li Liu & Yihong Duan & Xiaokang Hu & Peijun Shi, 2024. "Global warming determines future increase in compound dry and hot days within wheat growing seasons worldwide," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Nkongho Ayuketang Arreyndip, 2025. "The Russia–Ukraine Conflict: A Global Impact Assessment in the Corn and Wheat Sectors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Asif Warsi & Dr.Amena Sibghatullah & Dr.Athar Iqbal, 2019. "Empirics Of Agricultural Production: Comparison Of Instrumental Variable And Two Stage Least Square Approach," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(2), pages 62-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    2. Gao, Xuehui & Liu, Jian & Lin, Haixia & Javed, Tehseen & Yin, Feihu & Chen, Rui & Wen, Yue & Zhang, Jinzhu & Yi, Kefan & Wang, Zhenhua, 2025. "Using machine learning techniques to evaluate the impact of future climate change on wheat yields in Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    3. Li, Na & Yao, Ning & Li, Yi & Chen, Junqing & Liu, Deli & Biswas, Asim & Li, Linchao & Wang, Tianxue & Chen, Xinguo, 2021. "A meta-analysis of the possible impact of climate change on global cotton yield based on crop simulation approaches," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Gaupp, Franziska & Hall, Jim & Mitchell, Dann & Dadson, Simon, 2019. "Increasing risks of multiple breadbasket failure under 1.5 and 2 °C global warming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 34-45.
    5. Na Huang & Jialin Wang & Yu Song & Yuying Pan & Guolin Han & Ziyuan Zhang & Shangqian Ma & Guofeng Sun & Cong Liu & Zhihua Pan, 2022. "The adaptation mechanism based on an integrated vulnerability assessment of potato production to climate change in Inner Mongolia, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Paul Hewson & Keming Yu, 2008. "Quantile regression for binary performance indicators," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 401-418, September.
    7. Roberto Balado‐Naves & María A. García‐Valiñas & David Roibás Alonso, 2025. "Assessing the efficiency of residential water demand: The role of information," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 556-585, May.
    8. Emelia Mphande & Bridget Bwalya Umar & Chibuye Florence Kunda-Wamuwi, 2022. "Gender and Legume Production in a Changing Climate Context: Experiences from Chipata, Eastern Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Evenson, Robert E. & Kimhi, Ayal & Desilva, Sanjaya, 2000. "Supervision And Transaction Costs: Evidence From Rice Farms In Bicol, The Philippines," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21788, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Tom Kompas & Tuong Nhu Che & R. Quentin Grafton, 2004. "Technical efficiency effects of input controls: evidence from Australia's banana prawn fishery," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(15), pages 1631-1641.
    11. Shah, Showkat Ahmad & Haider, Salman & Ganaie, Rafiq Hussain, 2026. "Energy saving potential of the Indian chemical Industry: Role of innovation and export," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    12. Richard A. Hofler & John A. List, 2004. "Valuation on the Frontier: Calibrating Actual and Hypothetical Statements of Value," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(1), pages 213-221, February.
    13. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.
    14. Hailu, Getu & Weersink, Alfons & Minten, Bart J., 2015. "Rural Organizations, Agricultural Technologies and Production Efficiency of Teff in Ethiopia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211702, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Daniel Solís & Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta & Ricardo E. Quiroga, 2009. "Technical Efficiency among Peasant Farmers Participating in Natural Resource Management Programmes in Central America," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 202-219, February.
    16. Ashima Verma & Rachna Agrawal, 2024. "Has the Product Patent Regime Impacted Mergers and Acquisitions? Unveiling with a Systematic Literature Review," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 13(4), pages 414-427, August.
    17. Subhash C. Ray, 2004. "A Simple Statistical Test of Violation of the Weak Axiom of Cost Minimization," Indian Economic Review, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 111-121, January.
    18. Holtkamp, A.M. & Brummer, B., 2018. "Environmental efficiency of smallholder rubber production," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277518, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Andriakopoulos, Konstantinos & Ladas, Augoustinos & Andriakopoulos, Panagiotis, 2020. "Bank efficiency and leasing in U.S.A. banking system," MPRA Paper 112645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Guiomar Carranza-Gallego & Gloria I. Guzmán & Roberto Garcia-Ruíz & Manuel González de Molina & Eduardo Aguilera, 2019. "Addressing the Role of Landraces in the Sustainability of Mediterranean Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.