IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change of adaptability to increase employee performance in state-owned enterprises in agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Pramudito, Dicky
  • Suharnomo
  • Mahfudz

Abstract

Purpose. The main purpose of this research is to summarise the descriptive analysis of change impact and evaluate the impact of change adaptability on employee performance in state-owned enterprises (SOE) in Indonesian agriculture. Methodology / approach. This study integrates theoretical perspectives on change management, adaptability, organisational learning, and employee performance. The model was tested at Indonesian agricultural state-owned enterprise which consists of 14 companies around Indonesia. The sample comprised 373 employees in middle management. Descriptive analysis and probability sampling were used with a disproportionate stratified random sampling technique, Likert questionnaire scale, and indexing with three box methods and Structural Equation Model in Analysis of the Moment Structure program used for the research model. Results. The findings suggest that learning from past change has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, but the adaptability of change and memories of change have a non-significant effect on employee performance. The models fit the Goodness of Fit Criteria (GFI = 0.934; AGFI = 0.911; CMIN/DF = 1.918; RMSEA = 0.050; TLI = 0.982; CFI = 0.985; NFI = 0.969; p-Bollen-Stine Bootstrap = 0.058); and also based on the descriptive analysis, changes in technology is the most significant changes that affect on company. Originality / scientific novelty. Several studies in the literature include the relationship between change readiness, and adaptability on employee performance, nevertheless, this study further builds and examines the construct of adaptability of change, memories of change, learning from the last change, identifying employee performance scales that should be paid more attention to and the significance among them. Practical value / implications. Based on the study’s findings, the role of learning from past changes in affecting employee performance in Indonesian agricultural state-owned enterprise provides a new and significant insight into the research literature on change adaptability and the challenges facing these companies. It has practical implications for managers and leaders confronting organisational change management in Indonesia, enhancing employee performance, and realising sustainable agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Pramudito, Dicky & Suharnomo & Mahfudz, 2024. "Change of adaptability to increase employee performance in state-owned enterprises in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355969
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355969/files/10_Pramudito_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mochamad Rizki & Ryani Dhyan Parashakti & Lisnatiawati Saragih, 2019. "The Effect of Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture Towards Employees’ Innovative Behaviour and Performance," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 227-239.
    2. David Stark, 2001. "Heterarchy: Exploiting Ambiguity and Organizing Diversity," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 21(1), pages 22-41.
    3. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    4. Netty Merdiaty & Lenny Rosbi Rimbun & Putri Ade Dena Wijaya & Vinda Aisyah Shintiarafy, 2022. "Link readiness for change to work performance through mindfulness among health care employees in Indonesia," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 149-158, June.
    5. Francis Donkor & Zhou Dongmei & Isaac Sekyere, 2021. "The Mediating Effects of Organizational Commitment on Leadership Styles and Employee Performance in SOEs in Ghana: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    6. Audrey Charbonnier-Voirin & Patrice Roussel, 2012. "Adaptive Performance : a new scale to measure individual Performance in Organizations," Post-Print halshs-00738617, HAL.
    7. Matthew S. Kraatz & Edward J. Zajac, 2001. "How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 632-657, October.
    8. James Ford & Diana King, 2015. "A framework for examining adaptation readiness," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 505-526, April.
    9. D'Alizza Mercedes & Darrell Norman Burrell, 2021. "Managerial adaptability and business strategic change in age of COVID-19," PSU Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 190-204, April.
    10. Iqbal, Anam & Asrar-ul-Haq, Muhammad, 2018. "Establishing relationship between TQM practices and employee performance: The mediating role of change readiness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 62-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    2. Li, Wen Helena & Guo, Bin & De Sisto, Marco, 2021. "Untangling the commonalities and differences between domestic cross-regional experience and international experience in shaping speed of internationalization," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2).
    3. Jorge Rivera & Viviane Clement, 2019. "Business adaptation to climate change: American ski resorts and warmer temperatures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1285-1301, November.
    4. Thorsten Grohsjean & Tobias Kretschmer & Nils Stieglitz, 2011. "Performance Feedback, Firm Resources, and Strategic Change," DRUID Working Papers 11-02, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    5. Vrontis, Demetris & Basile, Gianpaolo & Simona Andreano, M. & Mazzitelli, Andrea & Papasolomou, Ioanna, 2020. "The profile of innovation driven Italian SMEs and the relationship between the firms’ networking abilities and dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 313-324.
    6. Chunping Deng & Fanchen Kong & Rong Zhu & Chun Sun, 2024. "Balance or not: configuring absorbed and unabsorbed slack resources to achieve supply chain resilience," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1509-1530, December.
    7. Basu, Sandip & Phelps, Corey & Kotha, Suresh, 2011. "Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 153-171, March.
    8. Isabel Diez-Vial & Marta Fernández-Olmos, 2017. "The effect of science and technology parks on a firm’s performance: a dynamic approach over time," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 413-434, July.
    9. Jalilvand, Abol & Kim, Sung Min, 2013. "Matching slack resources and investment strategies to achieve long-term performance: New perspectives on corporate adaptability," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 38-52.
    10. Fourné, Sebastian P.L. & Rosenbusch, Nina & Heyden, Mariano L.M. & Jansen, Justin J.P., 2019. "Structural and contextual approaches to ambidexterity: A meta-analysis of organizational and environmental contingencies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 564-576.
    11. William P. Barnett & Elizabeth G. Pontikes, 2008. "The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1237-1251, July.
    12. Busola Oluwafemi, Tolulope & Mitchelmore, Siwan & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2020. "Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 195-208.
    13. Lin-Hua Lu & Poh-Kam Wong, 2019. "Performance feedback, financial slack and the innovation behavior of firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1079-1109, December.
    14. Man Chen & Zhi Yang & Wenyu Dou & Feng Wang, 2018. "Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 97-119, March.
    15. Omid Omidvar & Mehdi Safavi & Vern L. Glaser, 2023. "Algorithmic Routines and Dynamic Inertia: How Organizations Avoid Adapting to Changes in the Environment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 313-345, March.
    16. Sarah E. A. Dixon & Klaus E. Meyer & Marc Day, 2010. "Stages of Organizational Transformation in Transition Economies: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 416-436, May.
    17. Waleczek, Peter & von den Driesch, Till & Flatten, Tessa C. & Brettel, Malte, 2019. "On the dynamic bundles behind operations management and research and development," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 175-187.
    18. Saehwa Hong & Hyung-Deok Shin, 2021. "Organizational slack and innovativeness: the moderating role of institutional transition in the Asian financial crisis," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 370-389, July.
    19. Johannes Luger & Sebastian Raisch & Markus Schimmer, 2018. "Dynamic Balancing of Exploration and Exploitation: The Contingent Benefits of Ambidexterity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 449-470, June.
    20. Razvan Lungeanu & Ithai Stern & Edward J. Zajac, 2016. "When do firms change technology-sourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 855-869, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.