IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/337430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional poverty of cassava farm households in Wonogiri Regency, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Arbianti, Arbianti
  • Rahayu, Endang Siti
  • Sutrisno, Joko

Abstract

Purpose. This study analyzed multidimensional poverty in cassava farm households in Wonogiri Regency, Indonesia. Methodology / approach. The main method was a descriptive quantitative approach. Moreover, a purposive method was used in determining the study area, considering that Wonogiri Regency is the largest cassava production area in Central Java Province. The number of research samples was 100 cassava farm households. The data analysis method used the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). Results. The headcount ratio (H) based on an analysis of 0.190 meant that 19 % of cassava farm households had poor multidimensional status, and another 81 % were not poor. Furthermore, the intensity of poverty (A) was 0.333, meaning the average deprivation of poor farmers was 0.333. In addition, the Multidimensional Poverty Index of cassava farm households was 0.063. Although the average weight of deprivation indicators of immunization, child mortality, school participation, sanitation, drinking water, and electricity was 0, it must be maintained to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Originality / scientific novelty. Poverty analysis with the Multidimensional Poverty Index approach has never been carried out on cassava farm households in the study area. Previously, data analysis was conducted in the study area included the potential of cassava in the context of food security, cassava-based agro-industrial development strategies, value-added analysis of cassava-based agro-industry, cost structure analysis and feasibility of cassava farming, risk analysis and distribution of cassava farming income as a result of climate change, income distribution with the Gini Index and Lorentz Curve. Therefore, this study fills the gaps in the literature. Practical value / implications. There is a need to improve the education of farmers’ children and future generations of farmers, and to increase the knowledge and understanding of farmers through advisory work in agriculture. The change of cooking fuel from wood and shrubs to liquefied petroleum gas needs should be implemented to improve the living standard of cassava farm households. The floor and roof components of houses need to be refined to improve the living standards of cassava households and increase access to the Internet as a means of information and communication. Improvements in education, health and living standards as multifaceted components must be carried out to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially in relation to poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Arbianti, Arbianti & Rahayu, Endang Siti & Sutrisno, Joko, 2023. "Multidimensional poverty of cassava farm households in Wonogiri Regency, Indonesia," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:337430
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.337430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337430/files/10_Arbianti_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.337430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ogutu, Sylvester Ochieng & Qaim, Matin, 2019. "Commercialization of the small farm sector and multidimensional poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 281-293.
    2. Ngoc-Ninh Ho & Truong Lam Do & Dinh-Thao Tran & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2022. "Indigenous pig production and welfare of ultra-poor ethnic minority households in the Northern mountains of Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 156-179, January.
    3. Roosemarina Anggraini Rambe & Purmini Purmini & Armelly Armelly & Lizar Alfansi & Ratu Eva Febriani, 2022. "Efficiency Comparison of Pro-Growth Poverty Reduction Spending before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of Regional Governments in Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Katsushi S. Imai & Wenya Cheng & Raghav Gaiha, 2017. "Dynamic and long-term linkages among agricultural and non-agricultural growth, inequality and poverty in developing countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 318-338, May.
    5. Danilson Varela & Filipa Monteiro & Patrícia Vidigal & Luís Silva & Maria M. Romeiras, 2020. "Mechanisms Implemented for the Sustainable Development of Agriculture: An Overview of Cabo Verde Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Yulida Safitri & Reni Diah Ningsih & Dwi Putri Agustianingsih & Vibhas Sukhwani & Akiko Kato & Rajib Shaw, 2021. "COVID-19 Impact on SDGs and the Fiscal Measures: Case of Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Hiroyuki Takeshima & Bedru B. Balana & Jenny Smart & Hyacinth O. Edeh & Motunrayo Ayowumi Oyeyemi & Kwaw S. Andam, 2022. "Subnational public expenditures, short‐term household‐level welfare, and economic flexibility: Evidence from Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 739-755, September.
    8. Saboor, Abdul & Khan, Atta Ullah & Hussain, Abid & Ali, Ikram & Mahmood, Khalid, 2015. "Multidimensional deprivations in Pakistan: Regional variations and temporal shifts," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 57-67.
    9. Iffat Abbas Abbasi & Hasbullah Ashari & Amin Jan & Ahmad Shabudin Ariffin, 2021. "Contract Farming towards Social Business: A New Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Schulte & Julian Mumber & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2023. "Agricultural commercialization and asset growth for poverty reduction: Evidence from panel data for rural Vietnam," TVSEP Working Papers wp-032, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Project TVSEP.
    2. Muhammad Masood Azeem & Amin W. Mugera & Steven Schilizzi & Kadambot H. M. Siddique, 2017. "An Assessment of Vulnerability to Poverty in Punjab, Pakistan: Subjective Choices of Poverty Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 117-152, October.
    3. Jiangning Cao & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Analyzing and Prioritizing the Barriers and Solutions of Sustainable Agriculture for Promoting Sustainable Development Goals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Sylvester Ochieng Ogutu & Theda Gödecke & Matin Qaim, 2020. "Agricultural Commercialisation and Nutrition in Smallholder Farm Households," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 534-555, June.
    5. Oliver Schulte & Trung Thanh Nguyen & Ulrike Grote, 2022. "The Effect of Renting in Cropland on Livelihood Choices and Agricultural Commercialization: A Case Study from Rural Vietnam," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(6), pages 2878-2898, December.
    6. Kulkarni, Varsha S. & Gaiha, Raghav, 2021. "Beyond Piketty: A new perspective on poverty and inequality in India," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 317-336.
    7. Li, Jiajia & Li, Houjian, 2022. "Spiritual support or living support: Which alleviates solid fuel use for rural households in ethnical minority regions of China?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 479-491.
    8. Barasa Bernard & Majaliwa J. G. Mwanjalolo & Banduga Moses & Katwere James & Magaya Paul & Sadadi Ojoatre & Wanjiru Lydia & Margaret N. Walusimbi, 2022. "A Simplified Spatial Methodology for Assessing Land Productivity Status in Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Arslan, Cansın & Wollni, Meike & Oduol, Judith & Hughes, Karl, 2022. "Who communicates the information matters for technology adoption," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Basu, Tirthankar & Das, Arijit, 2020. "Identification of backward district in India by applying the principal component analysis and fuzzy approach: A census based study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Tabish Nawab & Saqlain Raza & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Ghulam Yahya Khan & Sana Bashir, 2023. "Multidimensional poverty index across districts in Punjab, Pakistan: estimation and rationale to consolidate with SDGs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1301-1325, February.
    12. Sicelo Ignatius Dlamini & Wen-Chi Huang, 2019. "A Double Hurdle Estimation of Sales Decisions by Smallholder Beef Cattle Farmers in Eswatini," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Khun, Channary & Lim, Sokchea, 2023. "Productivity and market participation: Cambodian rice farmers," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Kiros Tsegay & Hongzhong Fan & Hailay Shifare & Priyangani Adikari, 2021. "Does credit access matter for household livelihood diversification in Ethiopia?An evidence from logistic regression model," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 3(2), pages 51-61, April.
    15. Martin Paul & Kai Mausch & Tesfaye B Woldeyohanes & Thomas Heckelei, 2022. "Three hurdles towards commercialisation: integrating subsistence chickpea producers in the market economy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(3), pages 668-695.
    16. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Gong, Binlei, 2023. "Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 941-960.
    17. Guyo Godana Dureti & Martin Paul Jr. Tabe‐Ojong & Enoch Owusu‐Sekyere, 2023. "The new normal? Cluster farming and smallholder commercialization in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(6), pages 900-920, November.
    18. Minghui Zhang & Weiqi Xia, 2022. "Research on the Law of China’s Rural Land Institutional Changes: An Analytical Framework of Economic Efficiency and Distributive Equity," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Yeboah, Frederick Kwame & Adingo, Samuel & Coffie, Cephas Paa Kwesi & Nyarko, Daniel Ayisi, 2021. "Commercializing Agriculture in Deprived Regions of Ghana: A Case of the Ekumfi District, Central Region," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 9(1), January.
    20. Md Sharifuzzaman & Hong-Seok Mun & Keiven Mark B. Ampode & Eddiemar B. Lagua & Hae-Rang Park & Young-Hwa Kim & Md Kamrul Hasan & Chul-Ju Yang, 2024. "Smart Pig Farming—A Journey Ahead of Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Food Security and Poverty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:337430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.