IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355998.html

Business models for engaging smallholder farmers in high-value markets: empirical evidence from vegetable value chains

Author

Listed:
  • Widadie, Fanny
  • Wulandari, Eliana
  • Lestari, Retna Dewi

Abstract

Purpose. This study explores the business models adopted by smallholder farmers in three different market channels – traditional, modern retail, and export markets. Furthermore, it evaluates and upgrades the smallholder business model in the traditional market to link and enhance inclusivity in high-value markets. Methodology / approach. We use a qualitative approach by exploring three case studies of business models. The business models in this study elaborate how smallholders managing their business in terms of managing resources, meeting quality standards, and establishing partnership to link and serve the specific markets using business model canvas (BMC) analysis. To evaluate, make strategies and create a new business model to increase small farmers’ access to high-value markets, we use strength, weakness, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis integrated with business model canvas analysis. Results. The business model of smallholders in traditional markets lacks added value, economic activity, and quality standard compliance and has poor coordination with vertical (buyers) and horizontal (farmer group) actors in the value chains, as well as lack of support from the government compared to the business models in high-value markets (modern retail and export markets). Therefore, to link and improve the inclusivity of smallholders with high-value markets, their business model should be re-designed such as creating value propositions to be more concerned with producing vegetables with high-quality standards; conducting post-harvest handling activities and adopting food safety standards in their key activities; strengthening horizontal collaboration among farmers as key resources; building vertical coordination with suppliers in high-value markets and partnership with the government; adding market channels to sell to specialised wholesalers and exporters, and investing in the knowledge and facilities to produce vegetables of high-quality and safety standards. Originality / scientific novelty. While many studies focus on specific markets, this study examines business models across three market channels. This study is among the first combine the BMC framework with SWOT analysis for smallholder business model evaluation and development. The result of this study bridges the gap between theory and practices in smallholder market inclusion, offering a novel framework for improvement business models of smallholders by integrates on economic, managerial and institutions perceptive. Practical value / implications. This study is useful for policymakers to address the business constraints of small businesses when linking to high-value markets. Management implications for upgrading business models are also elaborated in this study for the inclusion of smallholders in high-value markets. This study also contributes to the literature on the inclusiveness of business models for smallholder farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Widadie, Fanny & Wulandari, Eliana & Lestari, Retna Dewi, . "Business models for engaging smallholder farmers in high-value markets: empirical evidence from vegetable value chains," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355998
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355998/files/8_Widadie_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bob Doherty & Pichawadee Kittipanya-Ngam, 2021. "The Role of Social Enterprise Hybrid Business Models in Inclusive Value Chain Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Xuechao Sui & Xianhui Geng, 2021. "Continuous usage intention to e-transaction cards in wholesale markets of agriproducts: empirical evidence from China," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz & Jürgen Pretzsch, 2023. "Co‐creation of business models for smallholder forest farmers’ organizations: Lessons learned from rural Ethiopia and Tanzania," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 921-949, September.
    4. John M. Crespi & Tina L. Saitone, 2018. "Are Cattle Markets the Last Frontier? Vertical Coordination in Animal-Based Procurement Markets," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 207-227, October.
    5. Arbianti, Arbianti & Rahayu, Endang Siti & Sutrisno, Joko, . "Multidimensional poverty of cassava farm households in Wonogiri Regency, Indonesia," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(01).
    6. Marius Mihai Micu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Catalin Razvan Vintu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Gina Fintineru, 2022. "Models Underlying the Success Development of Family Farms in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Evans Ngenoh & Barnabas K. Kurgat & Hillary K. Bett & Sindu W. Kebede & Wolfgang Bokelmann, 2019. "Determinants of the competitiveness of smallholder African indigenous vegetable farmers in high-value agro-food chains in Kenya: A multivariate probit regression analysis," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Fanny Widadie & Jos Bijman & Jacques Trienekens, 2022. "Alignment between vertical and horizontal coordination for food quality and safety in Indonesian vegetable chains," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Ruml, Anette & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts in the African small farm sector: Insights from oil palm production in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Diederik de Boer & Gigi Limpens & Amzul Rifin & Nunung Kusnadi, 2019. "Inclusive productive value chains, an overview of Indonesia’s cocoa industry," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(5), pages 439-456, October.
    11. Derbe, Sisay Yefru & Weldeyohanis Kifle, Samuel & Yimenu, Samuel Mezemir & Shiferaw Geleta, Diriba & Woldegiorgis, Bezawit Seifu, 2024. "Market orientation and performance of smallholder tomato producers," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ridha, Ahmad & Masbar, Raja & Aliasuddin & Silvia, Vivi, . "Asymmetric Price Transmission in the Cocoa Supply Chain in Indonesia," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(01).
    2. Foster, Kenneth & Zurita, Carlos & Guzman, Lina Maria Suarez & Sepulveda, Diana Carolina Meza & Baributsa, Dieudonne, 2025. "Breaking Market Power: How Hermetic Storage Empowers Smallholder Cocoa Farmers in Colombia," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 13(3), July.
    3. Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcia & Isabel Gutiérrez-Montes & Juan Carlos Suárez Salazar & Fernando Casanoves & David Ricardo Gutiérrez Suárez & Héctor Eduardo Hernández-Núñez & Cornelia Butler Flora & , 2025. "Contribution of local knowledge in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) to the well‑being of cocoa families in Colombia: a response from the relationship," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 461-484, March.
    4. Janne Bemelmans & Miet Maertens, 2025. "Implementation and effectiveness of corporate-driven smallholder cocoa certification schemes in Indonesia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-38, December.
    5. Masud Rana & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2022. "Participation of Brinjal Farmers in Large and Small Wholesale Markets: Factors Influencing Farmers’ Decisions and Impact on Producers’ Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Gleimiria Batista da Costa Matos & Sergio Castro Gomes & Mariluce Paes de Souza & Leonardo de Castro Ribeiro, 2024. "Shared Value Chain in RECA: Study Founded on the Scenario Analysis," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(1), pages 49-62, March.
    7. Nguyen Thi Nha Trang & Thanh-Thuy Nguyen & Hong V. Pham & Thi Thu Anh Cao & Thu Huong Trinh Thi & Javad Shahreki, 2022. "Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Anette Ruml & Martin C. Parlasca, 2022. "In‐kind credit provision through contract farming and formal credit markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 402-425, April.
    9. Mai Chiem Tuyen & Prapinwadee Sirisupluxana & Isriya Bunyasiri & Pham Xuan Hung, 2022. "Perceptions, Problems and Prospects of Contract Farming: Insights from Rice Production in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Abman, Ryan & Lundberg, Clark, 2024. "Contracting, market access and deforestation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Ihli, Hanna & Seegers, Ronja & Winter, Etti & Chiputwa, Brian & Gassner, Anja, 2021. "Preferences for Tree-Fruit Market Attributes Among Smallholder Farmers in Eastern Rwanda: A Discrete Choice Experiment," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314980, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Kopp, Thomas & Dsouza, Alwin & Mishra, Ashok K., 2024. "The relation between contract type and market power: Evidence from a high-value crop in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Guansan Du & Frank Elston, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Financial risk assessment to improve the accuracy of financial prediction in the internet financial industry using data analytics models," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 925-940, December.
    14. Maya Irjayanti & Anton Mulyono Azis & Susilawati & Andika Rizki Sobari, 2025. "Transformative innovations igniting coffee supply chain process efficiency," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Saroj & Kirtti Ranjan Paltasingh, 2024. "What promotes production contract in Indian agriculture? Managing market risk versus profit orientation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(1), pages 140-153, January.
    16. Aomar Ibourk & Karim El Aynaoui, 2023. "Agricultural Cooperatives’ Sustainability and the Relevance of Start-Up Support Programs: Evidence from Cooperatives’ Level in Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Eliaza Mkuna & Edilegnaw Wale, 2022. "Explaining Farmers’ Income via Market Orientation and Participation: Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Luis M. Camarinha-Matos & Andre Dionisio Rocha & Paula Graça, 2024. "Collaborative approaches in sustainable and resilient manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 499-519, February.
    19. Hayes Dermot & Jacobs Keri & Schulz Lee & Crespi John, 2023. "Resilience of U.S. Cattle and Beef Sectors: Lessons from COVID-19," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 53-67, May.
    20. Nzuma, Jonathan Makau & Kaindi, Dasel Mulwa & Mwololo, Henry Muli, 2023. "Farm production diversity and its influence on diet quality: Evidence from South Eastern Kenya," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365946, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.