IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357410.html

Meeting Maize Requirement Production Targets through Utilisation of Potential Irrigable Area: Case of Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Musemwa, L.
  • Matsika, P.
  • Gadzirayi, C.
  • Chimvuramahwe, J.

Abstract

Zimbabwe, the once bread basket country of Southern Africa is experiencing recurring food shortages as a result of poor maize harvest. Researchers and politicians have blamed recurring droughts coupled with and lack of timely planting as the main cause of poor yields. This paper assessed whether Zimbabwe could meet its maize requirement if it revamp irrigation infrastructure and utilise its potential irrigable land for maize production. Data for the 8 rural provinces of Zimbabwe on potential irrigable area for the year 2013 was obtained from Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation Development. The study assumed four scenarios of average maize yields namely 0.8 tonnes, 2 tonnes, 5 tonnes and 10 tonnes per hectare.From the analysis it was found out that Zimbabwe has a total of 374 598 hectares of potential irrigable area in its 8 rural provinces of which the majority is occupied by A2, ARDA and Large Scale Commercial Farmers. Of the potential irrigable land, Manicaland Province has the largest area (117 163ha). Assuming that the maize output for the 2013/14 agricultural season of 1.2 million metric tonnes is maintained in the next coming agricultural season, the use of potential irrigable land for maize production of an average yield of 0.8 tonnes will result in a shortfall of a 0.6 million metric tonnes. At an average yield of 2 tonnes per hectare, a shortfall of 0.2 million metric tonnes will be experienced. All the other assumed scenarios, 5 tonnes and 10 tonnes per hectare, will result in Zimbabwe producing surplus maize. In order to insure that all the potential irrigable area is used for maize production the study recommended the issuing of maize starter packs for all those owning potential irrigable area, subsidisation of maize inputs by the government as well as setting of price floors for maize production and ensuring ready and reliable maize markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Musemwa, L. & Matsika, P. & Gadzirayi, C. & Chimvuramahwe, J., 2014. "Meeting Maize Requirement Production Targets through Utilisation of Potential Irrigable Area: Case of Zimbabwe," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 4(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357410/files/Musemwa422014AJAEES13227.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colman,David & Young,Trevor, 1989. "Principles of Agricultural Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521336642, November.
    2. World Bank, 2007. "World Development Report 2008," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5990, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lesly Cassin, 2018. "The effects of migration and pollution externality on cognitive skills in Caribbean economies: a Theoretical analysis," EconomiX Working Papers 2018-30, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    2. Muyaloka David & Norman Kachamba, 2024. "Assessing Factors Influencing the Failure of Constituency Development Fund (CDF) Projects in Education and Health Sectors in Zambia: A Critical Analysis," African Journal of Commercial Studies, African Journal of Commercial Studies, vol. 4(3).
    3. Carter, Michael & Morrow, John, 2014. "The political economy of inclusive rural growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Yonas Alem & Mintewab Bezabih & Menale Kassie & Precious Zikhali, 2010. "Does fertilizer use respond to rainfall variability? Panel data evidence from Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 165-175, March.
    5. Jackeline Velazco & Ramon Ballester, 2016. "Food Access and Shocks in Rural Households: Evidence from Bangladesh and Ethiopia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 527-549, November.
    6. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:7430-7437 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Arega D. Alene, 2010. "Productivity growth and the effects of R&D in African agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(3‐4), pages 223-238, May.
    8. Ioannis Glinavos, 2010. "Transition or development?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 10(1), pages 59-74, January.
    9. Serrao, Amilcar, 2016. "A controversial debate between financial speculation and changes in agricultural commodity spot prices," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235638, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Marius-Cristian PANĂ, 2012. "Education and Crisis," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(5(570)), pages 145-156, May.
    11. Ceballos, Francisco & Chugh, Aditi & Kramer, Berber, 2024. "Impacts of personalized picture-based crop advisories: Experimental evidence from India and Kenya," IFPRI discussion papers 2322, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Backson Mwangi & Ibrahim Macharia & Eric Bett, 2021. "Ex-post Impact Evaluation of Improved Sorghum Varieties on Poverty Reduction in Kenya: A Counterfactual Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 447-467, April.
    13. Olena Borodina & Vitaliy Krupin, 2018. "Is it Possible to Utilise the Agricultural Potential of Ukraine under the Current Agrarian System?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 46-51, April.
    14. ., 2013. "An Indian Miracle?," Chapters, in: D. S.P. Rao & Bart van Ark (ed.), World Economic Performance, chapter 4, pages 88-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Joel Negin & Roseline Remans & Susan Karuti & Jessica Fanzo, 2009. "Integrating a broader notion of food security and gender empowerment into the African Green Revolution," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(3), pages 351-360, September.
    16. Devkota, Krishna Prasad & Devkota, Mina & Boboev, Hasan & Juraev, Diyor & Dilmurodov, Sherzod & Sharma, Ram C., 2025. "Data-Driven Agronomic Solutions to Close Wheat Yield Gaps and Achieve Self-Sufficiency in Uzbekistan," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Ashok K. Mishra & Anjani Kumar & Pramod K. Joshi & Alwin D'Souza, 2018. "Cooperatives, contract farming, and farm size: The case of tomato producers in Nepal," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 865-886, October.
    18. van Keulen, Herman & Kuyvenhoven, Arie & Ruben, Ruerd, 1998. "Sustainable land use and food security in developing countries: DLV's approach to policy support," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 285-307, November.
    19. Sunil KANWAR & Elisabeth SADOULET, 2008. "Dynamic Output Response Revisited: The Indian Cash Crops," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 46(3), pages 217-241, September.
    20. Collins-Sowah, Peron A., 2018. "Theoretical conception of climate-smart agriculture," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2018-02, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    21. Fu, Xiaolan & Pietrobelli, Carlo & Soete, Luc, 2011. "The Role of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Innovation in the Emerging Economies: Technological Change and Catching-up," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 1204-1212, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.