IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aieabj/393893.html

Enabling technologies in citrus farming: A living lab approach to agroecology and sustainable water resource management

Author

Listed:
  • Timpanaro,Giuseppe
  • Cascone,Giulio
  • Foti, Vera Teresa

Abstract

This study examines the role of enabling technologies in the agroecological transition, focusing on sustainable water management in citrus farming through the participatory approach of a Living Lab in the Inner Area of Calatino in Sicily. The analysis is based on a comparison of two citrus farms: one equipped with advanced digital tools (sensors, decision support systems, and real-time monitoring), and one with a traditional management approach. Through the joint application of economic analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis, it was possible to estimate the effects of technology adoption. Findings reveal that enabling technologies reduce water consumption by 33%, increase yield per hectare by 16%, and boost net profit by 25% (+€2,780/ha), enhancing resource efficiency and lowering operational costs. Additionally, the Living Lab facilitated knowledge transfer, fostered collaboration, and mitigated resistance to innovation, highlighting the need for targeted training and institutional support to promote broader adoption. These results provide valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, demonstrating how digital solutions can drive sustainability, economic viability, and resilience in agriculture, but also for farmers, providing operational tools to improve farm efficiency and profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Timpanaro,Giuseppe & Cascone,Giulio & Foti, Vera Teresa, 2025. "Enabling technologies in citrus farming: A living lab approach to agroecology and sustainable water resource management," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 14(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:393893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/393893/files/W00125_67-84_05-17357-Timpanaro.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rocchi, Benedetto & Viccaro, Mauro & Sturla, Gino, 2024. "An input-output hydro-economic model to assess the economic pressure on water resources," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 7(01), July.
    2. Oriana Gava & Andrea Povellato & Francesco Galioto & Jaroslav Pražan & Gerald Schwarz & Alba Linares Quero & Uxue Yoldi Iragui & Carlos Astrain Massa & Andis Zīlāns & Johannes Carolus, 2022. "Policy Instruments to Support Agroecological Transitions in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 13-20, December.
    3. Bellon-Maurel, Véronique & Lutton, Evelyne & Bisquert, Pierre & Brossard, Ludovic & Chambaron-Ginhac, Stéphanie & Labarthe, Pierre & Lagacherie, Philippe & Martignac, Francois & Molenat, Jérome & Pari, 2022. "Digital revolution for the agroecological transition of food systems: A responsible research and innovation perspective," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Giuseppe Timpanaro & Vera Teresa Foti & Giulio Cascone & Manuela Trovato & Alessandro Grasso & Gabriella Vindigni, 2024. "Living Lab for the Diffusion of Enabling Technologies in Agriculture: The Case of Sicily in the Mediterranean Context," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Julian M. Alston, 2010. "The Benefits from Agricultural Research and Development, Innovation, and Productivity Growth," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 31, OECD Publishing.
    6. Ricard Espelt & Ismael Peña-López & Oriol Miralbell & Toni Martín & Núria Vega, 2019. "Impact of information and communication technologies in agroecological cooperativism in Catalonia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(2), pages 59-66.
    7. Hannah Duff & Paul B. Hegedus & Sasha Loewen & Thomas Bass & Bruce D. Maxwell, 2021. "Precision Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Jamil, Ihsan & Jun, Wen & Mughal, Bushra & Waheed, Junaid & Hussain, Hadi & Waseem, Muhammad, 2021. "Agricultural Innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Jorieke Potters & Kevin Collins & Herman Schoorlemmer & Egil Petter Stræte & Emils Kilis & Andy Lane & Heloise Leloup, 2022. "Living Labs as an Approach to Strengthen Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(1), pages 23-29, April.
    10. Frank Ewert & Roland Baatz & Robert Finger, 2023. "Agroecology for a Sustainable Agriculture and Food System: From Local Solutions to Large-Scale Adoption," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 351-381, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giagnocavo, Cynthia & Duque-Acevedo, Mónica & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo & Herforth-Rahmé, Joelle & Defossez, Emeline & Carlesi, Stefano & Delalieux, Stephanie & Gkisakis, Vasileios & Márton, Aliz & Molina-, 2025. "A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of digital technologies in European organic and agroecological farming systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Bianca AVRAM POP & Simona SABOU, 2018. "The Role Of Agriculture In Romanian Development," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 5-18, March.
    3. Jose‐Maria Garcia‐Alvarez‐Coque & Francisco Mas‐Verdu & Mercedes Sanchez García, 2015. "Determinants of Agri‐food Firms’ Participation in Public Funded Research and Development," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 314-329, June.
    4. Aaron Michael Shew & Alvaro Durand‐Morat & Lawton Lanier Nalley & Karen Ann‐Kuenzel Moldenhauer, 2018. "Estimating the benefits of public plant breeding: beyond profits," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 753-764, November.
    5. Imran Sajid & Bernhard Tischbein & Christian Borgemeister & Martina Flörke, 2022. "Assessing Barriers in Adaptation of Water Management Innovations under Rotational Canal Water Distribution System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Shew, Aaron M. & Nalley, Lawton L. & Durand-Morat, Alvaro & Meredith, Kylie & Parajuli, Ranjan & Thoma, Greg & Henry, Christopher G., 2021. "Holistically valuing public investments in agricultural water conservation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    7. Stéphane Lemarié & Valérie Orozco & Jean-Pierre Butault & Antonio Musolesi & Michel Simioni & Bertrand Schmitt, 2020. "Assessing the long-term impact of agricultural research on productivity: evidence from France," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(4), pages 1559-1586.
    8. Harika Meesala & Gianluca Brunori, 2025. "Dynamics of Using Digital Technologies in Agroecological Settings: A Case Study Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Karolina Pawlak & Luboš Smutka & Pavel Kotyza, 2021. "Agricultural Potential of the EU Countries: How Far Are They from the USA?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Thornton, PK & Schuetz, T & Förch, W & Cramer, L & Abreu, D & Vermeulen, S & Campbell, BM, 2017. "Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 145-153.
    11. Timotijevic, Lada & Khan, Shumaisa S. & Raats, Monique & Braun, Susanne, 2019. "Research priority setting in food and health domain: European stakeholder beliefs about legitimacy criteria and processes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 116-124.
    12. Galioto, Francesco & Nino, Pasquale, 2023. "Investigating the reasons behind the choice to promote crop diversification practices through the new CAP reform in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Pedro Andres Garzon Delvaux & Heinrich Hockmann & Peter Voigt & Pavel Ciaian & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2018. "The impact of private R&D on the performance of food-processing firms: Evidence from Europe, Japan and North America," JRC Research Reports JRC104144, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Quentin Toffolini & Marianne Cerf & Jeanne Cadiou & Thibault Lefeuvre & Lorène Prost & Rémy Ballot, 2025. "IDEAS: an experience to develop design capabilities in research and for innovation in territories," Post-Print hal-05269775, HAL.
    15. Palani Samy, Venkatesh & Pal, Barun Dep & Vellaichamy, Sangeetha & Renjini, V. R. & Kumar, Pramod & Girish Kumar, Jha, 2021. "A Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Approach for Analyzing Value of Research- A Case Study on Pusa Basmati Rice in India," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313973, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Hockmann, Heinrich & Garzon Delvaux, Pedro Andres & Voigt, Peter & Ciaian, Pavel & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2018. "Corporate R&D and the performance of food-processing firms: Evidence from Europe, Japan and North America," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 233-247.
    17. Jules-Daniel Wurlod & Derek Eaton, 2015. "Chasing After the Frontier in Agricultural Productivity," CIES Research Paper series 37-2015, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    18. Greer, Glen & Kaye-Blake, Bill, 2017. "The impacts of research in an era of more stringent performance evaluation," 2017 Conference, October 19-20, Rotorua, New Zealand 269522, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. Jenny Mairena Herrera Rodriguez & Lina María Otálora Gómez & Oscar Mauricio Lozano Rueda, 2020. "La innovación en marketing de las empresas agroindustriales de la Provincia de Sugamuxi," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(2), pages 45-62.
    20. Mogues, Tewodaj & Yu, Bingxin & Fan, Shenggen & McBride, Linden, "undated". "The impacts of public investment in and for agriculture: synthesis of the existing evidence," ESA Working Papers 288994, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:393893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.