IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i68p55.html

The New Sociopolitical and Economic Dynamics of Digitalisation and Automation in Romania s Automotive Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Alina Popescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Irina Elena Ion

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Klara Cermakova

    (Prague University of Economics, Czech Republic)

  • Radu Cristian Musetescu,

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Marinoiu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, characterised by the convergence of digital, biological, and physical innovations, is fundamentally transforming industries, economies, and the very fabric of society. This study focusses on the Romanian automotive industry - a sector at the forefront of technological disruption, examining the impact of digitalisation and automation (D&A) on the labour market and the broader societal implications. First, this research examines the perceptions and experiences of employees and trade union representatives within this industry, addressing critical issues such as changes in working conditions, job security, workload, and workplace safety. Second, this study discusses how these firm-level changes in D&A inform the emerging political economy of digitalisation in Romania, with a special emphasis on the ongoing debate between liberalism and statism. The research is based on the analysis of secondary sources, as well as the analysis and interpretation of valuable primary data collected through the semi-structured interview method, explored in depth with the help of latent content analysis. The findings of this study indicate a predominantly positive perception of D&A implementation, but are accompanied by several challenges, especially changes in working conditions and the nature of managerial work. Findings offer insights into the intersection of technological progress and sociopolitical dynamics and highlight the need for innovative, well-targeted public policies to manage these transformations, such as industrial, labour market, and continuing education policies, also inviting us to imagine a new social economy of advanced technological progress in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Alina Popescu & Irina Elena Ion & Klara Cermakova & Radu Cristian Musetescu, & Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu & Ana-Maria Marinoiu, 2025. "The New Sociopolitical and Economic Dynamics of Digitalisation and Automation in Romania s Automotive Industry," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(68), pages 1-55, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3385.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    2. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Woerter, Martin, 2019. "Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    3. Emilie Jasova & Bozena Kaderabkova, 2021. "Ambiguous effects of minimum wage tool of labour markets regulation ? key study of V4 countries," International Journal of Economic Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 10(2), pages 58-85, December.
    4. Rosie Collington, 2022. "Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 312-328, March.
    5. Prettner, Klaus & Strulik, Holger, 2020. "Innovation, automation, and inequality: Policy challenges in the race against the machine," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 249-265.
    6. Barbara Prainsack, 2020. "Oil crisis: the political economy of digital data. Conclusion of the special issue," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 563-566, September.
    7. Emilie Jasova & Bozena Kaderabkova, 2021. "Ambiguous effects of minimum wage tool of labour markets regulation – key study of V4 countries," International Journal of Economic Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 10(2), pages 59-86, December.
    8. Barbara Prainsack, 2020. "The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 439-446, September.
    9. Ban, Cornel, 2016. "Ruling Ideas: How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190600396.
    10. Kevin A. Bryan & Heidi L. Williams, 2021. "Innovation: Market Failures and Public Policies," NBER Working Papers 29173, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Silviu-Gabriel Szentesi & Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Ramona Lile & Paul Nichita Cuc, 2021. "Internet of Things (IoT), Challenges and Perspectives in Romania: A Qualitative Research," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(57), pages 448-448.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Łuczak & Klara Cermakova & Sławomir Kalinowski & Eduard Hromada, 2026. "Patterns in Progress: a Taxonomic Analysis of EU Countries by Sustainability and Living Standards in 2015–2023," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 1-32, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Ugur, Mehmet, 2024. "Effects of innovation and markups on employment and labour share in OECD industries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 221-234.
    4. Zhou, Yuwen & Shi, Xin, 2025. "How does digital technology adoption affect corporate employment? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Jurkat, Anne & Klump, Rainer & Schneider, Florian, 2025. "Robots and wages: A meta-analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 541-567.
    6. Krenz, Astrid & Strulik, Holger, 2025. "Automation and the fall and rise of the servant economy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Richiardi, Matteo & Westhoff, Leonie & Astarita, Caterina & Ernst, Ekkehard & Fenwick, Clare & Khabirpour, Neysan & Pelizzari, Lorenzo, 2024. "The impact of a decade of digital transformation on employment, wages, and inequality in the EU: a “conveyor belt†hypothesis," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA5/24, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    8. Cirillo, Valeria & Mina, Andrea & Ricci, Andrea, 2024. "Digital technologies, labor market flows and training: Evidence from Italian employer-employee data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Mi Guo, 2024. "Does Industrial Intelligence Promote Sustainable Employment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Tianru Qin & Lin Liang & Peng Liang & Wenqun Liang, 2025. "Can industrial robot utilization drive the total factor productivity of enterprises?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 129-148, January.
    11. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    12. Chang, Qing & Wu, Mengtao & Zhang, Longtian, 2024. "Endogenous growth and human capital accumulation in a data economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 298-312.
    13. Fierro, Luca Eduardo & Caiani, Alessandro & Russo, Alberto, 2022. "Automation, Job Polarisation, and Structural Change," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 499-535.
    14. Hang, Leiming & Lu, Wei & Ge, Xiaowei & Ye, Bin & Zhao, Zhiqi & Cheng, Fangfang, 2024. "R&D innovation, industrial evolution and the labor skill structure in China manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. José-Ignacio Antón & David Klenert & Enrique Fernández-Macías & Maria Cesira Urzì Brancati & Georgios Alaveras, 2022. "The labour market impact of robotisation in Europe," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(3), pages 317-339, September.
    16. Peng Liang & Xinhui Sun & Luzhuang Qi, 2024. "Does artificial intelligence technology enhance green transformation of enterprises: based on green innovation perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21651-21687, August.
    17. David Hémous & Morten Olsen, 2021. "Directed Technical Change in Labor and Environmental Economics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 571-597, August.
    18. Yituan Liu & Yabin Bian & Wenhao Zhang, 2022. "How Does Enterprises’ Digital Transformation Impact the Educational Structure of Employees? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Guimarães, Luís & Mazeda Gil, Pedro, 2022. "Explaining the Labor Share: Automation Vs Labor Market Institutions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Stähler, Nikolai, 2021. "The Impact of Aging and Automation on the Macroeconomy and Inequality," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.