IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v26y2024i65p363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Architecture to Transform Classic Academic Courses into Adaptive Learning Flows with Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei Bobocea

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Razvan Bologa

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Lorena Batagan

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Bogdan-Stefan Posedaru

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The literature on adaptive learning suggests that it can provide significant improvements to the educational process and numerous studies have found a necessity for personalised learning, which is one of the strong suits of adaptive learning. Adaptive learning platforms require that content be effective, and lack thereof has hindered large-scale adoption by adding the cost of content creation to the upfront implementation cost and creating a 'critical mass' type problem where a platform without content is ineffective and unattractive, leading to lack of interest from users and lack of funding for developing new content. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has the potential to aid in content creation by taking on a significant part of the workload. This paper aims to explore this possibility and propose an architecture based on current artificial intelligence technologies that will help teachers and experts transform classic course materials into adaptive learning flows. The system is not autonomous and will not replace a human expert but rather will take on some of the more straightforward, but time-consuming, work. The proposed approach results in a distinct system, independent of the adaptive learning platform itself, that can help rephrase, restructure and enrich the content, resulting in an automated digital narrative, or fragment thereof, that can be exported in a format based on open standards and used within an adaptive learning platform of choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Bobocea & Razvan Bologa & Lorena Batagan & Bogdan-Stefan Posedaru, 2024. "Architecture to Transform Classic Academic Courses into Adaptive Learning Flows with Artificial Intelligence," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 363-363, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:65:p:363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3298.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans David S. & Schmalensee Richard, 2010. "Failure to Launch: Critical Mass in Platform Businesses," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Cristina Venera Tartavulea & Catalin Nicolae Albu & Nadia Albu & Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu & Silvia Petre, 2020. "Online Teaching Practices and the Effectiveness of the Educational Process in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 920-920, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo Vignieri, 2021. "Crowdsourcing as a mode of open innovation: Exploring drivers of success of a multisided platform through system dynamics modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 108-124, January.
    2. Veiga, André, 2018. "A note on how to sell a network good," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 114-126.
    3. Fabian Aulkemeier & Maria-Eugenia Iacob & Jos Hillegersberg, 2019. "Platform-based collaboration in digital ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 597-608, December.
    4. Vlad I. Bocanet & Ken Brown & Anne Uukkivi & Filomena Soares & Ana Paula Lopes & Anna Cellmer & Carles Serrat & Cristina Feniser & Florina M. Serdean & Elena Safiulina & Gerald Kelly & Joanna Cymerman, 2021. "Change in Gap Perception within Current Practices in Assessing Students Learning Mathematics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Lechman, Ewa, 2014. "The ‘technological take-off’ and the 'critical mass'. A trial conceptualization," MPRA Paper 59506, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Duch-Brown, Néstor & Rossetti, Fiammetta, 2020. "Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Marleen Marra, 2019. "Pricing and Fees in Auction Platforms with Two-Sided Entry," Working Papers hal-03393068, HAL.
    8. Dutta, Amitava & Puvvala, Abhinay & Roy, Rahul & Seetharaman, Priya, 2017. "Technology diffusion: Shift happens — The case of iOS and Android handsets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 28-43.
    9. Enzo Bivona & Federico Cosenz, 2021. "Designing a Multi‐Sided Platform business model assessment framework: a Dynamic Performance Management perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 93-107, January.
    10. Toshiyuki Hasumi & Mei-Shiu Chiu, 2022. "Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4631-4654, August.
    11. Kevin J. Boudreau, 2021. "Promoting Platform Takeoff and Self-Fulfilling Expectations: Field Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5953-5967, September.
    12. Monica Ioana Burcă-Voicu & Romana Emilia Cramarenco & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Investigating Learners’ Teaching Format Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation on an Emerging Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Evans David S. & Pirchio Alexis, 2014. "An Empirical Examination of Why Mobile Money Schemes Ignite in Some Developing Countries but Flounder in Most," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 397-451, December.
    14. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5kht5rc22p99sq5tol4efe4ssb is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Eric K. Clemons & Maximilian Schreieck & Sebastian Hermes & Frantz Rowe & Helmut Krcmar, 2022. "The Cooperation Paradox," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 459-471, June.
    16. Saul Estrin & Susanna Khavul & Mike Wright, 2022. "Soft and hard information in equity crowdfunding: network effects in the digitalization of entrepreneurial finance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1761-1781, April.
    17. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Basaure, Arturo & Vesselkov, Alexandr, 2018. "Internet of things (IoT) platform competition: consumer switching versus provider multihoming," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190352, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Thierry Isckia & Mark de Reuver & Denis Lescop, 2020. "Orchestrating platform ecosystems : the interplay of innovation and business development subsystems," Post-Print hal-02548106, HAL.
    20. Jullien, Bruno & Pavan, Alessandro & Rysman, Marc, 2021. "Two-sided Markets, Pricing, and Network Effects," TSE Working Papers 21-1238, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    21. repec:gdk:wpaper:26 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    AI content generation; artificial intelligence; adaptive learning; learning flows; personalised learning; educational content.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:65:p:363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.