IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aejmic/v14y2022i2p139-75.html

Group Hug: Platform Competition with User Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Sarit Markovich
  • Yaron Yehezkel

Abstract

We consider platform competition for small users and a user group. One platform enjoys a quality advantage and the other benefits from favorable beliefs. We study whether the group mitigates the users' coordination problem⁠—i.e., joining a low-quality platform because they believe that other users would do the same. We find that a group that can facilitate coordination on the high-quality platform may choose to maintain the dominance of the low-quality one. Users' utility is non-monotonic in the proportion of the group. Finally, we highlight factors that motivate the group to help the high-quality platform to win the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarit Markovich & Yaron Yehezkel, 2022. "Group Hug: Platform Competition with User Groups," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 139-175, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:139-75
    DOI: 10.1257/mic.20190372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20190372
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20190372.appx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20190372.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/mic.20190372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanna Hałaburda & Yaron Yehezkel, 2016. "The Role of Coordination Bias in Platform Competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 274-312, April.
    2. Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 1988. "Competitive Promotional Strategies," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(4), pages 427-449, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seiya Hirano, 2024. "Consumer Coordination and Optimal Pricing under Network Externalities," ISER Discussion Paper 1267, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    2. Elias Carroni & Leonardo Madio & Shiva Shekhar, 2024. "Superstar Exclusivity in Two-Sided Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 991-1011, February.
    3. Robert Akerlof & Richard Holden & Luis Rayo, 2024. "Network Externalities and Market Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 4037-4050, June.
    4. Sarit Markovich & Yaron Yehezkel, 2026. "Competing for Cookies: Platforms’ Business Models in Data Markets with Network Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 915-931, February.
    5. Sarit Markovich & Yaron Yehezkel, 2024. "“For the public benefit”: Data policy in platform markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 652-685, August.
    6. Amit Kumar Bardhan & Saad Ashraf, 2024. "More buyers or more sellers: on marketing resource allocation strategies of competing two-sided platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2579-2608, December.
    7. Haijun Chen & Qi Xu, 2025. "Exclusivity Under Different Vertical Structures in Online Platforms With Network Effects," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1792-1815, April.
    8. Song, Haiqing & Cao, Kai & Duan, Housheng, 2025. "Strategic counterfeit suppression on online platform: Considering network externalities and online consumer reviews in a two-period framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianqiang Zhang & Weijun Zhong & Shue Mei, 2012. "Competitive effects of informative advertising in distribution channels," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 561-584, September.
    2. Anindya Ghose & Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Uday Rajan, 2007. "The Impact of Internet Referral Services on a Supply Chain," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 300-319, September.
    3. Julian Villanueva & Pradeep Bhardwaj & Sridhar Balasubramanian & Yuxin Chen, 2007. "Customer relationship management in competitive environments: The positive implications of a short-term focus," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 99-129, June.
    4. Gergely Biczók & Sándor Kardos & Tuan Trinh, 2010. "Pricing Internet access in the presence of user loyalty," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 119-147, July.
    5. Miao, Chun-Hui, 2010. "Consumer myopia, standardization and aftermarket monopolization," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(7), pages 931-946, October.
    6. Konrad, Kai A. & Kovenock, Dan, 2009. "Competition for FDI with vintage investment and agglomeration advantages," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 230-237, November.
    7. Yi Xiang & David A. Soberman, 2011. "Preview Provision Under Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 149-169, 01-02.
    8. Thierry Warin & Daniel B. Leiter, 2007. "An Empirical Study of Price Dispersion in Homogenous Goods Markets," Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0710, Middlebury College, Department of Economics.
    9. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    10. Yiquan Gu & Tobias Wenzel, 2017. "Consumer confusion, obfuscation and price regulation," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(2), pages 169-190, May.
    11. Derui Wang & Xiaole Wu & Christopher S. Tang & Yue Dai, 2025. "Endogenous Merger Decisions Among Competitors: Impact of Limited Capacity and Loyal Segments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4777-4794, June.
    12. Chioveanu, Ioana, 2019. "Prominence, complexity, and pricing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 551-582.
    13. Shubhranshu Singh, 2017. "Competition in Corruptible Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 361-381, May.
    14. Liu, Fang & Sainathan, Arvind, 2026. "When Should We Offer a Discount? Randomized Discount Timing with Strategic Customers," MPRA Paper 128162, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Sridhar Moorthy & Shervin Shahrokhi Tehrani, 2023. "Targeting Advertising Spending and Price on the Hotelling Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1057-1079, November.
    16. Wilson, Chris M., 2010. "Ordered search and equilibrium obfuscation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 496-506, September.
    17. Il-Horn Hann & Kai-Lung Hui & Sang-Yong Tom Lee & Ivan P.L. Png, 2005. "Sales and Promotions: A More General Model," Industrial Organization 0508014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Hanna Halaburda & Yaron Yehezkel, 2019. "Focality advantage in platform competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 49-59, January.
    19. Michael R. Baye & John Morgan, 2009. "Brand and Price Advertising in Online Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1139-1151, July.
    20. Zhang, Jianqiang & Liang, Qi & Huang, Jian, 2016. "Forward advertising: A competitive analysis of new product preannouncement," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 3-12.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:139-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.