IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acb/agenda/v19y2012i1p5-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australia's 2009 ATM Reforms: Transparency for Transparency's Sake

Author

Listed:
  • Hugh Green

Abstract

This paper reviews the effectiveness of the reforms to the Australian ATM of early 2009. Data indicate that consumers have acted on the more transparent display of fees by shifting their transactions towards fee-free ATMs provided by their own financial institution, thereby reducing the fees they pay, at the cost of added travel costs. But although consumer surplus has increased, the overall result has been a less-efficient use of the ATM network: banks have lost the whole fall in fee revenue, while consumers have gained only the fee saving, less the extra travel costs. Further, the promise of lower fees did not eventuate, and there was no significant increase in availability of ATMs. Nonetheless, the reforms have been hailed as a success because of the increased pricing transparency in the market. This paper questions the worth of increased transparency when prices are inefficient and welfare loss is the consequence.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugh Green, 2012. "Australia's 2009 ATM Reforms: Transparency for Transparency's Sake," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 5-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:5-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p192951/pdf/australia01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jocelyn Donze & Isabelle Dubec, 2009. "Paying For Atm Usage: Good For Consumers, Bad For Banks?," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 583-612, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donze Jocelyn & Dubec Isabelle, 2011. "ATM Direct Charging Reform: the Effect of Independent Deployers on Welfare," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Heng Chen & Marie-Hélène Felt, 2022. "Canadians’ Access to Cash Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Discussion Papers 2022-15, Bank of Canada.
    3. Guerino Ardizzi & Massimiliano Cologgi, 2022. "Business models and pricing strategies in the market for ATM withdrawals," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 23, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Donze, Jocelyn & Dubec, Isabelle, 2009. "La tarification des retraits aux distributeurs automatiques bancaires, une revue de la littérature [ATM withdrawal pricing, a survey of the literature]," MPRA Paper 16546, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Stijn Ferrari, 2010. "Discriminatory fees, coordination and investment in shared ATM networks," Working Paper Research 184, National Bank of Belgium.
    6. Stijn Ferrari & Frank Verboven & Hans Degryse, 2010. "Investment and Usage of New Technologies: Evidence from a Shared ATM Network," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 1046-1079, June.
    7. Donze, Jocelyn & Dubec, Isabelle, 2010. "The effects of regulating interchange fees at cost on the ATM market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 187-189, May.
    8. Bianchi, Milo & Bouvard, Matthieu & Gomes, Renato & Rhodes, Andrew & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Mobile payments and interoperability: Insights from the academic literature," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Hugh Green, 2012. "The Treasury-Reserve Bank ATM Taskforce Report: Would it Pass a Cost-Benefit Analysis?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 63-68.
    10. Kopsakangas-Savolainen Maria & Takalo Tuomas, 2014. "Competition Before Sunset: The Case of the Finnish ATM Market," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-33, March.
    11. Wenzel Tobias, 2013. "Naive Consumers, Banking Competition, and ATM Pricing," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 271-286, October.
    12. Heng Chen & Daneal O’Habib & Hongyu Xiao, 2023. "How Far Do Canadians Need to Travel to Access Cash?," Discussion Papers 2023-28, Bank of Canada.
    13. Markkula, Tuomas & Takalo, Tuomas, 2021. "Competition and regulation in the Finnish ATM industry," BoF Economics Review 8/2021, Bank of Finland.
    14. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2012_032 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Pedro I. González Ramírez & Leobardo Plata Pérez, 2015. "Análisis teórico de las modificaciones a la regulación de comisiones interbancarias en cajeros automáticos en México," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 30(1), pages 141-178.
    16. Tobias Wenzel, 2014. "Independent Service Operators in ATM Markets," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(1), pages 26-47, February.
    17. Wilko Bolt & Sujit Chakravorti, 2010. "Digitization of Retail Payment," DNB Working Papers 270, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    18. Russ Kashian & Richard McGregory & Robert Drago, 2016. "ATM Fees at Black and Hispanic Owned Single Market Banks: A Comparative Analysis," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 43(1), pages 69-84, March.
    19. Kopsakangas-Savolainen Maria & Takalo Tuomas, 2014. "Competition Before Sunset: The Case of the Finnish ATM Market," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-33, March.
    20. Santiago Carbó-Valverde & Sujit Chakravorti & Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández, 2009. "Regulating two-sided markets: an empirical investigation," Working Paper Series WP-09-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.