IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abz/journl/y2026id638.html

“Economics of technology†: principles of development and potential assessment

Author

Listed:
  • O. S. Sukharev

Abstract

The paper considers a relatively new scientific direction “economics of technology†, which is part of a broader direction “economics of scientific and technological progress†, and studies the patterns of emergence, implementation, operation, withdrawal and competition of technologies, processes of technological substitution and addition, development of technologies. The purpose of the study is to determine the main principles of development of the scientific direction “economics of technology†and technological development itself, as well as the application of the author’s doctrine of “two potentials†in the framework of quantitative assessment of technological potential for making a technological choice. The methodology is the theory of technological development, “economics of technology†, the doctrine of “two potentials†– current and prospective. The result of the work is a set of principles of technological development and “economics of technology†as a research direction, as well as an approach to assessing technological potential and a methodology for choosing a technological solution when replacing imported or obsolete technology. It allows you to give a qualitative assessment of the existing set of basic technologies within a specific technological direction, type of activity or even an industry. Of course, it is necessary to take into account the fact that even one imported element within a technology can restrain its development and ensure a fairly high dependence on external technical solutions, as well as prevent it from being given the status of a completely domestic technology. In this regard, a qualitative assessment of the content of the technology, its additional characteristics is needed to ensure the adequacy of the technological choice. The tools created within the framework of this article significantly advance the development of the “economics of technology†as a scientific direction at the theoretical and methodological-measurement level of analysis. A methodology for comparative assessment of technologies in the field of microelectronics is shown, demonstrating the options for choosing in a situation of substituting imported and abandoning obsolete technology in favor of a new domestic technology.Â

Suggested Citation

  • O. S. Sukharev, 2026. "“Economics of technology†: principles of development and potential assessment," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 12(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:abz:journl:y:2026:id:638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/viewFile/638/325
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Crafts, 2005. "The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the Slow Growth/Rapid Industrialization Paradox," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(2-3), pages 525-534, 04/05.
    2. Amann, Edmund, 2002. "Globalisation, industrial efficiency and technological sovereignty: Evidence from Brazil," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 875-888.
    3. Chaturvedi, Tuhin, 2023. "How corporate development activities resolve the legitimacy-adaptation dilemma: A case study in technological substitution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Edler, Jakob & Blind, Knut & Kroll, Henning & Schubert, Torben, 2023. "Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    5. Barrena Martinez, Jesus & Criceli, Livio & Ferrándiz, Esther & Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele, 2020. "Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm," MPRA Paper 123400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Barrena-Martínez, Jesús & Cricelli, Livio & Ferrándiz, Esther & Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele, 2020. "Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 261-270.
    7. Grimaldi, Michele & Greco, Marco & Cricelli, Livio, 2021. "A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 156-164.
    8. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Yan, Jingyang, 2024. "Will artificial intelligence make energy cleaner? Evidence of nonlinearity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muthu Silva & Federica Rossi & Nicola Searle, 2025. "How do firms shape their interactions with universities to build structural, human and relational capital? A mixed-method study of UK firms that interact with universities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1633-1668, August.
    2. Amirthanathan Prashanthan, 2025. "Development of Integrated Open Innovation Based Knowledge Management Framework in Telecommunication Organization," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 1055-1071, May.
    3. Tao, Jiayi & Zhang, Xinhe & Wu, Xiaofei & Zhou, Qin, 2026. "Rethinking corporate diversification in emerging markets: How digital transformation reshapes strategies in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Petro Pererva & Andrii Ievsieiev & Mariya Maslak & Maksym Tkachov & Nadiya Tkachova, 2024. "Formation of intellectual property commercialization strategies," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 1(13 (127)), pages 80-91, February.
    5. Zambrano-Monserrate, Manuel A., 2025. "Mapping the impact of artificial intelligence on energy poverty: New evidence from spatial panel models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Madugba Joseph Ugochukwu & Egbide Ben-Caleb & Uzondu Anoruoh Paul & Oparah Vivian Iheaku & Adesola Deborah Ayomide, 2023. "Intellectual Capital Value Addition and the Efficient Assets Management of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 241-260, December.
    7. Costa, Alessandra & Crupi, Antonio & Cesaroni, Fabrizio & Abbate, Tindara, 2025. "Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in addressing sustainable development. A semantic analysis of AI patents," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Schubert Torben & Kroll Henning & Blind Knut & Frietsch Rainer, 2024. "Forschungs-, Technologie- und Innovationspolitik muss die Entstehung kritischer Massen fördern," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 104(4), pages 241-245, April.
    9. Zhu, Qingyuan & Sun, Chenhao & Xu, Chengzhen & Geng, Qianqian, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence on global energy vulnerability," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 15-27.
    10. Wasim ul Rehman & Faryal Jalil & Omur Saltik & Suleyman Degirmen & Mustafa Bekmezci, 2024. "Leveraging Strategic Innovation and Process Capabilities for Intellectual Capital Initiative Performance of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs): A Knowledge-Based Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4161-4202, March.
    11. Yu, Yingjie & Du, Debin & Li, Qixiang, 2025. "Who leads the chain? Deciphering the trajectory of global value network in technology-intensive manufacturing and innovation effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Yoon, Hyungseok David & Sinani, Evis & Papanastassiou, Marina & Economou, Ioannis G., 2025. "More jobs for our foes? Global R&D strategy in the age of techno-nationalism," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    13. Kuberska Dominika & Grzybowska-Brzezińska Mariola & Zachłowski Patryk, 2023. "Implementation of the User Innovation Model in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Food Processing Industry," Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, Sciendo, vol. 377(4), pages 52-69, December.
    14. Zhou, Zhilong & Qi, Di, 2023. "Offensive corporate strategy and collaborative innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    15. Kim, Kyoung Yong & Takeuchi, Riki & Clark, Kevin D. & Patel, Pankaj C., 2025. "Entrepreneurial Team Design and Outcomes: Exploring the Influence of Ownership Structure, Team Size, and Gender Composition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    16. Hans-Joachim Voth & Jaume Ventura, 2015. "Debt into Growth: How Sovereign Debt Accelerated the First Industrial Revolution," Working Papers 830, Barcelona School of Economics.
    17. Lin, Yujun & Lin, Yuqi & Liu, Junbo & Tan, Zhaoyang & Han, Weihang, 2026. "Triple Helix Synergy Model in China's new technology diplomacy: Perspectives from AI startups," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    18. Boqiang Lin & Yitong Zhu, 2025. "Does AI elevate corporate ESG performance? A supply chain perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 586-597, January.
    19. Abhari, Kaveh & McGuckin, Summer, 2023. "Limiting factors of open innovation organizations: A case of social product development and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Kroll, Henning & Ferrante, Chiara, 2024. "Redefining criticality in a changing world: Combining domestic and global perspectives on enabling technologies," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 86, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abz:journl:y:2026:id:638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://delo.ranepa.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.