IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p780-d480606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Relational Capital in Anti-Crisis Measures Undertaken by Companies—Conclusions from a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Walecka

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Production Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article was to present the results of empirical research conducted in enterprises of all sizes operating in Poland and Central Europe. The study focused on the impact of relational capital on the prevention of and intervention in the event of a crisis in a company. The author assumes that there is a link between a company’s relational capital and its susceptibility to crisis phenomena. The research carried out allowed different conclusions to be drawn. It turns out that the studied companies were characterized by a high level of relational capital. Their internal relational capital—particularly the relations between employees and company owners—was especially important to them. Relations of the surveyed companies with external stakeholders were also important. In response to the question about the role of relational capital in anti-crisis measures undertaken by companies, it appears that the relational capital of the companies surveyed allowed them, in their opinion, to avoid many crisis situations. Thanks to the right attitudes of the surveyed companies’ stakeholders, they have often managed to avoid crises. This situation also applies to the recent crisis caused by COVID-19.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Walecka, 2021. "The Role of Relational Capital in Anti-Crisis Measures Undertaken by Companies—Conclusions from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:780-:d:480606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/780/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/780/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barrena-Martínez, Jesús & Cricelli, Livio & Ferrándiz, Esther & Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele, 2020. "Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 261-270.
    2. Anna Walecka, 2020. "Relational Capital and an Enterprise Crisis in the Light of Expert Opinion Survey," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Meltem Ş. Ucal (ed.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, pages 39-58, Springer.
    3. Child, John & Faulkner, David & Tallman, Stephen, 2005. "Cooperative Strategy: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199266258, Decembrie.
    4. Ploychompoo Kittikunchotiwut, 2018. "Social Capital as Knowledge Absorptive Capacity and Firm Innovation," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 7808721, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    5. Drago Dubrovski, 2007. "Management Mistakes as Causes of Corporate Crises: Countries in Transition," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 5(4), pages 333-354.
    6. Florin Oprea & Mihaela Onofrei & Dan Lupu & Georgeta Vintila & Gigel Paraschiv, 2020. "The Determinants of Economic Resilience. The Case of Eastern European Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Dennis W. Tafoya, 2020. "Crisis, Catastrophe, and Disaster in Organizations," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-37074-9, September.
    8. Irena Macerinskiene & Simona Survilaite, 2019. "Company’s intellectual capital impact on market value of Baltic countries listed enterprises," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(2), pages 309-339, June.
    9. Pratyush Bharati & Abhijit Chaudhury, 2019. "Assimilation of Big Data Innovation: Investigating the Roles of IT, Social Media, and Relational Capital," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1357-1368, December.
    10. Raquel Sanchis & Luca Canetta & Raúl Poler, 2020. "A Conceptual Reference Framework for Enterprise Resilience Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adamik Anna & Walecka Anna, 2024. "The maturity of using the organization’s relational intelligence in the processes of building relational capital: a smart organization example," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 60(1), pages 44-59, March.
    2. Anna Walecka, 2021. "The Management of a Company’s Relational Capital as Part of Business Process," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 704-721.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2019. "Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-38, September.
    2. Kaczmarczyk Paweł, 2017. "Taxonomic Analysis of Voivodships Development in Terms of ICT Usage in Enterprises," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 83-96, December.
    3. Barmeyer, Christoph & Davoine, Eric, 2019. "Facilitating intercultural negotiated practices in joint ventures: The case of a French–German railway organization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-11.
    4. Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Innovation Capability in Manufacturing Companies Operating in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Max J. Ringlstetter & Benjamin Klein & Björn Schäfer, 2014. "Interorganisationale Kooperationsfähigkeit in der Praxis — Zentraler Baustein zur Sicherung der Zukunftsfähigkeit von Unternehmen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(68), pages 123-146, January.
    6. Duan, Wenqi & Madasi, Joseph David & Khurshid, Adnan & Ma, Dan, 2022. "Industrial structure conditions economic resilience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska, 2017. "Inter- and intra-firm learning synergy through integrating absorptive capacity and employee suggestion processes: The case study of Frauenthal Automotive Toruń company," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 25-67.
    8. Denis Dennehy & Kieran Conboy & Jaganath Babu, 2023. "Adopting Learning Analytics to Inform Postgraduate Curriculum Design: Recommendations and Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1315-1331, August.
    9. Hsieh, Linda H.Y. & Rodrigues, Suzana B. & Child, John, 2010. "Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 288-303, September.
    10. Ifrim, Mihaela & Lazorec, Maria & Pintilescu, Carmen, 2022. "Assessing the economic resilience in central and eastern EU countries. A multidimensional approach," MPRA Paper 117912, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Evgeny V. Balatsky & Natalia A. Ekimova, 2023. "Antifragility of the national economy: A heuristic assessment," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 28-49, July.
    12. Chang-Tai Lee & Jin-Li Hu & Ming-Hsin Kung, 2022. "Economic Resilience in the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Across-Economy Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Grimaldi, Michele & Greco, Marco & Cricelli, Livio, 2021. "A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 156-164.
    14. Li, Xiaoqing & Roberts, Joanne & Yan, Yanni & Tan, Hui, 2014. "Knowledge sharing in China–UK higher education alliances," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 343-355.
    15. Marzi, Giacomo & Fakhar Manesh, Mohammad & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Vlačić, Božidar, 2023. "Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Oleg Sergeevich Sukharev, 2023. "Intellectual Firm: Key Features and Development Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1091-1119, June.
    17. Bijman, Jos & Doorneweert, Bart, 2008. "Entrepreneurship, Collective Entrepreneurship and the Producer-Owned Firm," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43960, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Lavopa, Alejandro & Donnelly, Carolina, 2023. "Socioeconomic resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. The role of industrial capabilities," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 44-57.
    19. Agata Sudolska & Andrzej Lis, 2014. "Building a Model of Successful Collaborative Learning for Company Innovativeness," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(3), pages 109-137.
    20. Kuberska Dominika & Grzybowska-Brzezińska Mariola & Zachłowski Patryk, 2023. "Implementation of the User Innovation Model in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Food Processing Industry," Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, Sciendo, vol. 377(4), pages 52-69, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:780-:d:480606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.