IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aat/journl/y2013i3p96-104.html

Moldova’S Chance To Innovation: Can The Cis Survey Help A Developing Countrysucceed?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela DUCA

    (NIER, Chisinau, RM, Bloomberg, London, UK)

Abstract

The Republic of Moldova is one of the few remaining countries in Europe that has not yet taken the Community Innovation Survey (CIS). Can this survey help Moldova identify the drawbacks and advantages of its national innovation system? This article establishes that CIS is indeed a useful tool for an initial diagnostic study. However, in a transitional economy, where little is known about innovation, CIS results must be complemented with open-ended questionnaires. It is found that, even though the innovation output is relatively high compared to other developing countries, Moldova is stuck in Rothwell’s first generation model of innovation. Moreover, as resources are not readily available for purchasing new technologies, the government and private companies can work towards encouraging a knowledge infrastructure that promotes organizational and management innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela DUCA, 2013. "Moldova’S Chance To Innovation: Can The Cis Survey Help A Developing Countrysucceed?," Economy and Sociology, The Journal Economy and Sociology, issue 3, pages 96-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2013:i:3:p:96-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://old.economy-sociology.ince.md/?edmc=533
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Bogliacino & Giulio Perani & Mario Pianta & Stefano Supino, 2010. "Innovation and Development. The Evidence from Innovation Surveys," Working Papers of BETA 2010-13, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. repec:cup:jfinqa:v:46:y:2011:i:06:p:1545-1580_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ayyagari, Meghana & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Maksimovic, Vojislav, 2011. "Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(6), pages 1545-1580, December.
    4. Jens Fr¯slev Christensen, 2002. "Corporate strategy and the management of innovation and technology," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(2), pages 263-288.
    5. Bostjan Antoncic & Igor Prodan & Robert D. Hisrich & Cezar Scarlat, 2007. "Technological Innovativeness and Firm Performance in Slovenia and Romania," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 281-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela DUCA, 2013. "Moldova’S Chance To Innovation: Can The Cis Survey Help A Developing Countrysucceed?," ECONOMY AND SOCIOLOGY: Theoretical and Scientifical Journal, Socionet;Complexul Editorial "INCE", issue 3, pages 96-104.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.
    3. Sam Njinyah & Simplice A. Asongu, 2022. "The relationship between firms that start operating as unregistered and firms’ innovation: the moderating effect of access to finance," Working Papers 22/099, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    4. Jeehan Awad & Rodrigo Martín‐Rojas, 2024. "Enhancing social responsibility and resilience through entrepreneurship and digital environment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1688-1704, May.
    5. Junli Wang & Wendong Lv & Yao Zhao & Na Xu, 2022. "The Impact of Global Value Chain Embedding on Corporate Risk Taking of China’s A-Share Market-Listed Companies from 2000–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Jean C. Kouam & Simplice A. Asongu, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 22/046, African Governance and Development Institute..
    7. Xu, Jinhua & Xiong, Xinran & Li, Xiaoxia & Li, Shanmin, 2025. "Digital merger & acquisition and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Zhang, Zhengyong & Xu, Zefeng & Ding, Yi, 2023. "Do economic growth target constraints affect firm innovation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 373-388.
    9. David Urbano & Maribel Guerrero & João J. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes, 2019. "New technology entrepreneurship initiatives: Which strategic orientations and environmental conditions matter in the new socio-economic landscape?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1577-1602, October.
    10. Fathi Fakhfakh & Virginie Pérotin & Andrew Robinson, 2011. "Workplace Change and Productivity: Does Employee Voice Make a Difference?," Chapters, in: Susan Hayter (ed.), The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Wang, Jiaxin & Liu, Jiemei & Wang, Jiawei & Huang, Xiang & Liu, Yu, 2023. "The puzzle of household wealth preservation and corporate innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Chuks Otioma, 2023. "IT Capability, Organisational Learning and Innovation Performance of Firms in Kenya," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 3489-3517, September.
    13. Liu, Yu & Xu, Jian & Zhou, Yifan, 2026. "Quantifying the legacy of trauma: The long-term impact of the African slave trade on contemporary firm corruption," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Rufei Ma & Xu He & Xin Xiang, 2022. "Cross‐listing on the Hong Kong Exchange and Chinese firm innovation: New evidence," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 365-393, June.
    15. Zhao, Qiuhan & Wu, Wei & Ge, Yuanqin & Xu, Jing, 2025. "Can intellectual property protection policy enhance enterprise innovation capability? Quasi-natural experimental study," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Ullah, Barkat, 2021. "Does innovation explain the performance gap between privatized and private firms?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    17. Bostan, Ibrahim & Spatareanu, Mariana, 2018. "Financing innovation through minority acquisitions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 418-432.
    18. Liu,Yu & Peng,Mike W. & Wei,Zuobao & Xu,Jian & Xu,L. Colin, 2021. "Organizational Resources, Country Institutions, and National Culture behind Firm Survival and Growth during COVID-19," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9633, The World Bank.
    19. Çağatay Bircan & Ralph De Haas, 2020. "The Limits of Lending? Banks and Technology Adoption across Russia," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 536-609.
    20. Wang, Xiaodong & Han, Liang & Huang, Xing, 2020. "Bank market power and SME finance: Firm-bank evidence from European countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2013:i:3:p:96-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iordachi Victoria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iefscmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.