Detecting Collusion in Procurement Auctions: A Selective Survey of Recent Research
AbstractRevised April 2002 Economic theory suggests that if firms can successfully collude, they will be able to increase their own profits at the consumers’ expense. Government antitrust policy aims to protect the public from such behavior. Enforcing such policy depends on a prosecutor’s ability to detect collusive behavior among firms. In this paper, we discuss an approach developed Bajari and Ye (2001a,b) for detecting collusion. First, we discuss two conditions: conditional independence and exchangeability, which the data must exhibit if it has been generated by non-collusive behavior. Second, by eliciting information from industry experts about costs across the industry under scrutiny, it is possible to compute the probability that the data was generated by competition or collusion. These tests appear to work well in empirical applications. In industries where competition is widely believed to exist, we find that our conditions are largely supported by the data. In industries where collusion has already been proven, we find that indeed, our tests point to obvious collusion. While we do not believe these empirical tests are flawless, we argue that they can be a useful first step in detecting suspicious bidding behavior. Working Papers Index
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Stanford University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 01014.
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Ralph Landau Economics Building, Stanford, CA 94305-6072
Web page: http://www-econ.stanford.edu/econ/workp/
More information through EDIRC
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2001-10-16 (All new papers)
- NEP-MIC-2001-10-16 (Microeconomics)
- NEP-REG-2001-10-16 (Regulation)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Geiss, Charles G & Kuhlman, John M, 1978. "Estimating Price Lists, List Changes, and Market Shares from Sealed Bids," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(2), pages 193-209, April.
- Robert H. Porter & J. Douglas Zona, 1997.
"Ohio School Milk Markets: An Analysis of Bidding,"
NBER Working Papers
6037, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- McAfee, R. Preston & McMillan, John., 1990.
726, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- von Ungern-Sternberg, Thomas, 1988.
"Cartel Stability in Sealed Bid Second Price Auctions,"
Journal of Industrial Economics,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 351-58, March.
- Thomas VON UNGERN-STERNBERG, 1988. "Cartel Stability in Sealed Bid Second Price Auctions," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du DÃ©partement d'EconomÃ©trie et d'Economie politique (DEEP) 8802, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, DEEP.
- Fehl, Ulrich & Guth, Werner, 1987. "Internal and external stability of bidder cartels in auctions and public tenders: A comparison of pricing rules," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 303-313.
- Baldwin, Laura H & Marshall, Robert C & Richard, Jean-Francois, 1997.
"Bidder Collusion at Forest Service Timber Sales,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(4), pages 657-99, August.
- Kenneth Hendricks & Robert Porter, 1989.
"Collusion in Auctions,"
817, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Hendricks, Kenneth & Porter, Robert H, 1988. "An Empirical Study of an Auction with Asymmetric Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(5), pages 865-83, December.
- Porter, Robert H & Zona, J Douglas, 1993.
"Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 101(3), pages 518-38, June.
- Hay, George A & Kelley, Daniel, 1974. "An Empirical Survey of Price Fixing Conspiracies," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 13-38, April.
- Pesendorfer, Martin, 2000. "A Study of Collusion in First-Price Auctions," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 381-411, July.
- Graham, Daniel A & Marshall, Robert C, 1987. "Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single-Object Second-Price and English Auctions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(6), pages 1217-39, December.
- Patrick Bajari & Lixin Ye, 2001.
"Deciding Between Competition and Collusion,"
01008, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
- Feinstein, Jonathan S & Block, Michael K & Nold, Frederick C, 1985. "Asymmetric Information and Collusive Behavior in Auction Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 441-60, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.