Do people move to cities because of marriage market considerations? In cities singles can meet more potential partners than in rural areas. Singles are therefore prepared to pay a premium in terms of higher housing prices. Once married, the marriage market benefits disappear while the housing premium remains. We extend the model of Burdett and Coles (1997) with a distinction between efficient (cities) and less efficient (non-cities) search markets. One implication of the model is that singles are more likely to move from rural areas to cities while married couples are more likely to make the reverse movement. A second prediction of the model is that attractive singles benefit most from a dense market (i.e. from being choosy). Those predictions are tested with a unique Danish dataset.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics in its series CAM Working Papers with number
2005-01.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Henriette Aabo Hansen).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Paper
Gautier, Pieter A & Svarer, Michael & Teulings, Coen N, 2005.
"Marriage and the City,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
4939, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Gautier, Pieter A. & Svarer, Michael & Teulings, Coen N., 2005.
"Marriage and the City,"
IZA Discussion Papers
1491, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
[Downloadable!]
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Daniel S. Hamermesh & Jeff E. Biddle, 1993.
"Beauty and the Labor Market,"
NBER Working Papers
4518, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Gary S. Becker, 1974.
"A Theory of Marriage: Part II,"
NBER Chapters,
in: Marriage, Family, Human Capital, and Fertility, pages 11-26
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Pieter A. Gautier & Michael Svarer & Coen N. Teulings, 2007.
"Sin City,"
IZA Discussion Papers
2632, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
[Downloadable!]
Gautier, Pieter A & Svarer, Michael & Teulings, Coen N, 2007.
"Sin City?,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
6170, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Pieter A. Gautier & Michael Svarer & Coen N. Teulings, 2007.
"Sin City?,"
CAM Working Papers
2007-01, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics.
[Downloadable!]
Pieter A. Gautier & Michael Svarer & Coen N. Teulings, 2007.
"Sin City?,"
Economics Working Papers
2007-01, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus.
[Downloadable!]