Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

General Ability and Specialization: Evidence From Penalty Kicks in Soccer

Contents:

Author Info

  • Florian Baumann

    (University of Tübingen)

  • Tim Friehe

    ()
    (University of Konstanz)

  • Michael Wedow

    (Bundesbank)

Abstract

This article revisits the 2 × 2 penalty kick game and seeks to explain differences in mixed strategies associated with different player types and the relative performance of these player types. The authors show that (a) a kicker's general ability is a reliable indicator of his success rate, (bi) a kicker's specialization rate increases with his general ability, and (c) left-footed kickers who present a minority within the total population are characterized by a higher success rate. Consequently, the authors establish that more able kickers show a higher degree of specialization. Their greater specialization, however, has neither an adverse nor a beneficial impact on their success rate. All the theoretical predictions are in line with empirical evidence from the German national soccer league.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://jse.sagepub.com/content/12/1/81.abstractFileFormat:text/html
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by in its journal Journal of Sports Economics.

Volume (Year): 12 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
Pages: 81-105

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:12:y:2011:i:1:p:81-105

Contact details of provider:

Related research

Keywords: game theory; mixed strategy; soccer; penalty kicks;

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Germán Coloma, 2012. "The penalty-kick game under incomplete information," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 487, Universidad del CEMA.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:12:y:2011:i:1:p:81-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.