IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/ukc/ukcedp/1614.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Appropriate Technology and Balanced Growth

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. James P. Choy, 2024. "A theory of discriminatory institutions, with applications to apartheid and to the political economy of migration," Discussion Papers 2024-06, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
  2. Gomes, Orlando, 2024. "Optimal planning of technological options and productivity distribution dynamics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
  3. Tyler Atkinson & Michael Plante & Alexander Richter & Nathaniel Throckmorton, 2022. "Complementarity and Macroeconomic Uncertainty," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 44, pages 225-243, April.
  4. Bahman Peyravi & Kęstutis Peleckis & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2023. "Eco-Innovation Performance of Lithuania in the Context of European Environmental Policy: Eco-Innovation Indicators and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
  5. Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús & Yu, Yang & Zanetti, Francesco, 2024. "Technological Synergies, Heterogeneous Firms, and Idiosyncratic Volatility," CEPR Discussion Papers 18899, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  6. Jose Barrales-Ruiz, Ivan Mendieta-Muñoz, Codrina Rada, Daniele Tavani, Rudiger von Arnim, 2020. "The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2020_07, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
  7. Florentine Schwark & Andreas Tryphonides, 2022. "Digitalization and Resilience to Disaggregate Shocks," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 08-2022, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
  8. Cantore, Cristiano & Ferroni, Filippo & León-Ledesma, Miguel A., 2017. "The dynamics of hours worked and technology," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 67-82.
  9. Gregory Casey & Ryo Horii, 2019. "A Multi-factor Uzawa Growth Theorem and Endogenous Capital-Augmenting Technological Change," ISER Discussion Paper 1051, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
  10. Boldrin, Michele & Levine, David K. & Wang, Yong & Zhu, Lijun, 2024. "A theory of the dynamics of factor shares," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
  11. Manu, Ana S. & McAdam, Peter & Willman, Alpo, 2022. "China’s great expansion: The role of factor substitution and technical progress," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  12. John Hassler & Per Krusell & Conny Olovsson, 2021. "Directed Technical Change as a Response to Natural Resource Scarcity," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(11), pages 3039-3072.
  13. Schwark, Florentine & Tryphonides, Andreas, 2025. "The effects of digitalization on production," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
  14. Sequeira, Tiago Neves & Gil, Pedro Mazeda & Afonso, Oscar, 2018. "Endogenous growth and entropy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 100-120.
  15. Guimarães, Luís & Mazeda Gil, Pedro, 2022. "Explaining the Labor Share: Automation Vs Labor Market Institutions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  16. Michael Knoblach & Fabian Stöckl, 2020. "What Determines The Elasticity Of Substitution Between Capital And Labor? A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 847-875, September.
  17. Nikolaos Charalampidis, 2020. "The U.S. Labor Income Share And Automation Shocks," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(1), pages 294-318, January.
  18. Kemnitz, Alexander & Knoblach, Michael, 2020. "Endogenous sigma-augmenting technological change: An R&D-based approach," CEPIE Working Papers 02/20, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
  19. Irmen Andreas, 2020. "Endogenous task-based technical change—factor scarcity and factor prices," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 81-118, June.
  20. Jakob Grazzini & Lorenza Rossi, 2020. "New Firms, Capital Intensity and the Labor Share: New Theoretical and Empirical Insights," CESifo Working Paper Series 8255, CESifo.
  21. Sekyu Choi & José-Víctor Ríos-Rull, 2021. "Labour Share and Productivity Dynamics," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(639), pages 2856-2886.
  22. Jose Barrales‐Ruiz & Ivan Mendieta‐Muñoz & Codrina Rada & Daniele Tavani & Rudiger von Arnim, 2022. "The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 468-503, April.
  23. Michele Battisti & Valentino Dardanoni & Stefano Demichelis, 2024. "Inter-firm Heterogeneity in Production," Papers 2411.15980, arXiv.org.
  24. Kostarakos, Ilias, 2020. "Determinants of the (non-Housing) Labour Income Share in the EU," Papers WP693, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
  25. Dudley Cooke, 2019. "Technology Choice and the Long- and Short-Run Armington Elasticity," Globalization Institute Working Papers 373, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
  26. Xun Wang & Jingwen Yu, 2023. "Accumulating human capital: Corporate innovation and firm value," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(4), pages 750-776, December.
  27. Zhao, Xiaoxia & Jia, Chi & Li, Haoru, 2025. "Cost pressure or innovation-driven? Social insurance and firm exporting," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  28. Casey, Gregory, 2024. "Unemployment and the direction of technical change," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
  29. Bena, Jan & Ortiz-Molina, Hernán & Simintzi, Elena, 2022. "Shielding firm value: Employment protection and process innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 637-664.
  30. Lin, Justin Yifu & Liu, Zhengwen & Zhang, Bo, 2023. "Endowment, technology choice, and industrial upgrading," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 364-381.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.