IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/enepol/v82y2015icp156-165.html

The stuttering energy transition in Germany: Wind energy policy and feed-in tariff lock-in

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Mengelkamp, Esther & Schönland, Thomas & Huber, Julian & Weinhardt, Christof, 2019. "The value of local electricity - A choice experiment among German residential customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 294-303.
  2. John Colton & Kenneth Corscadden & Stewart Fast & Monica Gattinger & Joel Gehman & Martha Hall Findlay & Dylan Morgan & Judith Sayers & Jennifer Winter & Adonis Yatchew, 2016. "Energy Projects, Social Licence, Public Acceptance and Regulatory Systems in Canada: A White Paper," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 9(20), May.
  3. Radtke, Jörg & Scherhaufer, Patrick, 2022. "A social science perspective on conflicts in the energy transition: An introduction to the special issue," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
  4. Li, Aitong & Xu, Yuan & Shiroyama, Hideaki, 2019. "Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
  5. Köktürk, G. & Tokuç, A., 2017. "Vision for wind energy with a smart grid in Izmir," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 332-345.
  6. Kriechbaum, Michael & Posch, Alfred & Hauswiesner, Angelika, 2021. "Hype cycles during socio-technical transitions: The dynamics of collective expectations about renewable energy in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
  7. Erik Gawel & Sebastian Strunz & Paul Lehmann, 2016. "Support policies for renewables: Instrument choice and instrument change from a Public Choice perspective," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-6, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  8. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2017. "Review of distributed generation (DG) system planning and optimisation techniques: Comparison of numerical and mathematical modelling methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 531-573.
  9. Tabatabaei, Sharareh Majdzadeh & Hadian, Ebrahim & Marzban, Hossein & Zibaei, Mansour, 2017. "Economic, welfare and environmental impact of feed-in tariff policy: A case study in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 164-169.
  10. Kejia Yang & Kaidong Feng, 2024. "Going beyond catch up: two governance models of China’s low-carbon energy transitions," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20240108, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
  11. Wei-Ming Chen & Hana Kim, 2019. "Circular economy and energy transition: A nexus focusing on the non-energy use of fuels," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(4), pages 586-600, June.
  12. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
  13. Erik Gawel & Sebastian Strunz & Paul Lehmann, 2016. "Support policies for renewables Instrument choice and instrument change from a Public Choice perspective," WIDER Working Paper Series 006, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  14. Ann-Kathrin Dieterle & Stephanie Duchek, 2023. "Implementing Strategic Resilience Through Cooperation Projects with Start-ups: a Multiple Case Study," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 549-586, December.
  15. Javanmardi, Komar & van der Hilst, Floor & Fattahi, Amir & Camargo, Luis Ramirez & Faaij, André, 2025. "Unraveling the spatial complexity of national energy system models: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  16. Paul Lehmann & Patrik Söderholm, 2018. "Can Technology-Specific Deployment Policies Be Cost-Effective? The Case of Renewable Energy Support Schemes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(2), pages 475-505, October.
  17. Engelhorn, Thorsten & Müsgens, Felix, 2021. "Why is Germany’s energy transition so expensive? Quantifying the costs of wind-energy decentralisation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
  18. Yang, Ju-Ying & Dodge, Jennifer, 2024. "Local energy transitions as process: How contract management problems stymie a city's sustainable transition to renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
  19. Sen, Kanchan Kumar & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Chapman, Andrew J. & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2025. "How does environmental policy shape the impact of energy innovation funding on renewable energy generation? Evidence from econometric and machine learning approaches," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
  20. Bórawski, Piotr & Bełdycka-Bórawska, Aneta & Jankowski, Krzysztof Jóżef & Dubis, Bogdan & Dunn, James W., 2020. "Development of wind energy market in the European Union," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 691-700.
  21. Jin, Wei & Zhang, ZhongXiang, "undated". "Levelling the Playing Field: On the Missing Role of Network Externality in Designing Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Policies," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 208433, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  22. Köhrsen, Jens, 2018. "Exogenous shocks, social skill, and power: Urban energy transitions as social fields," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 307-315.
  23. Nordensvard, Johan & Zhou, Yuan & Zhang, Xiao, 2018. "Innovation core, innovation semi-periphery and technology transfer: The case of wind energy patents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 213-227.
  24. Frauke Urban & Giuseppina Siciliano & Linda Wallbott & Markus Lederer & Anh Dang Nguyen, 2018. "Green transformations in Vietnam's energy sector," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 558-582, September.
  25. Weiss, Günther, 2017. "Medial construction of energy landscapes in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 845-853.
  26. Qi, Xiaoyan & Guo, Yanshan & Guo, Pibin & Yao, Xilong & Liu, Xiuli, 2022. "Do subsidies and R&D investment boost energy transition performance? Evidence from Chinese renewable energy firms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  27. Stewart, Fraser, 2021. "All for sun, sun for all: Can community energy help to overcome socioeconomic inequalities in low-carbon technology subsidies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  28. Tsamara Tsani & Tristan Pelser & Romanos Ioannidis & Rachel Maier & Ruihong Chen & Stanley Risch & Felix Kullmann & Russell McKenna & Detlef Stolten & Jann Michael Weinand, 2025. "Quantifying the trade-offs between renewable energy visibility and system costs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
  29. Kiunke, Theresa & Gemignani, Natalia & Malheiro, Pedro & Brudermann, Thomas, 2022. "Key factors influencing onshore wind energy development: A case study from the German North Sea region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
  30. Albulut, Koray, 2026. "Addressing social vulnerabilities resulting from low-carbon energy transition policies in EU-27 countries: A systematic survey of the literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PA).
  31. Xiaoxia Gao & Lu Xia & Lin Lu & Yonghua Li, 2019. "Analysis of Hong Kong’s Wind Energy: Power Potential, Development Constraints, and Experiences from Other Countries for Local Wind Energy Promotion Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
  32. Jin, Wei, 2021. "Path dependence, self-fulfilling expectations, and carbon lock-in," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
  33. Hoz, Jordi de la & Martín, Helena & Montalà, Montserrat & Matas, José & Guzman, Ramon, 2018. "Assessing the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework applied to the concentrating solar power systems in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1377-1399.
  34. Acuna, Jorge A. & Cantarino, Daniela & Martinez, Rodrigo & Zayas-Castro, José L., 2024. "A two-stage stochastic game model for elective surgical capacity planning and investment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.