IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wtowps/321864.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade policy bias and the gender wage gap

Author

Listed:
  • Bekkers, Eddy
  • Jhunjhunwala, Kirti
  • Metivier, Jeanne
  • Stolzenburg, Victor
  • Yilmaz, Ayse Nihal

Abstract

On average, wages of female workers are lower than wages of male workers. In this paper, we explore to what extent a gender bias in trade costs explains this gender wage gap and how different policy reforms could lower it. First, we analyse the relation between various types of trade costs and female labour intensity across sectors. We find that more female labour intensive sectors face both higher tariffs and non-tariff barriers when exporting to other regions and when importing inputs. Second, we explore different trade policy reforms with regards to goods and services trade, and find that services trade policy reform has a more meaningful impact. Third, we simulate trade cost reductions caused by a reduced requirement for face-to-face interaction in services jobs, a phenomenon driven by digitalisation. This change would generate a much larger reduction of the gender wage gap than trade policy reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Bekkers, Eddy & Jhunjhunwala, Kirti & Metivier, Jeanne & Stolzenburg, Victor & Yilmaz, Ayse Nihal, 2025. "Trade policy bias and the gender wage gap," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2025-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:321864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/321864/1/1930408471.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:321864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wtoerch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.