IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/uwhdps/232012.html

Zur Beziehung von Akzeptanz, Gerechtigkeit und Leistungsfähigkeit der sozialen Marktwirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Sauerland, Dirk

Abstract

Nicht nur vor dem Hintergrund der aktuellen Umfragen ist die Fragestellung des vorliegenden Beitrags dreiteilig. Zunächst geht es um die Frage, was wir über die Akzeptanz der sozialen Marktwirtschaft eigentlich wissen - und wie die empirisch ermittelte Akzeptanz sich zur theoretisch begründbaren verhält. In einem zweiten Schritt soll analysiert werden, welche Rolle die (wahrgenommenen) Gerechtigkeit als Determinante der Akzeptanz spielt. Auch hier gibt es eine wirtschaftstheoretische Perspektive und eine empirische. In der Zusammenfassung werden Akzeptanz bzw. Gerechtigkeit der Leistungsfähigkeit der sozialen Marktwirtschaft gegenübergestellt und ihre mögliche Interdependenz diskutiert - auch anhand von empirischen Daten. Die systematische Analyse der möglichen Ursachen der Akzeptanz einer Wirtschaftsordnung ist notwendig, um mögliche (wirtschafts-)politische Ansatzpunkte und Transmissionsmechanismen zur Verbesserung der Akzeptanz der Wirtschaftsordnung zu finden. Der Ausblick beinhaltet daher Hinweise auf solche Ansatzpunkte Diese zu finden ist insbesondere dann sinnvoll, wenn die Akzeptanz die Leistungsfähigkeit bzw. Stabilität der Wirtschaftsordnung beeinflusst.

Suggested Citation

  • Sauerland, Dirk, 2012. "Zur Beziehung von Akzeptanz, Gerechtigkeit und Leistungsfähigkeit der sozialen Marktwirtschaft," Wittener Diskussionspapiere zu alten und neuen Fragen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft 23/2012, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Management and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:uwhdps:232012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/58245/1/716091917.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cipriani, Giam Pietro & Lubian, Diego & Zago, Angelo, 2009. "Natural born economists?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 455-468, June.
    2. Roland Bénabou & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 699-746.
    3. Sinn, Hans-Werner, 1986. "Risiko als Produktionsfaktor," Munich Reprints in Economics 19879, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    4. Dominik H. Enste & Alexandra Haferkamp & Detlef Fetchenhauer, 2009. "Unterschiede im Denken zwischen Ökonomen und Laien – Erklärungsansätze zur Verbesserung der wirtschaftspolitischen Beratung," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(1), pages 60-78, February.
    5. Sauerland Dirk, 2004. "Die Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft: eine ordnungspolitische Analyse," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 55(1), pages 209-234, January.
    6. Stefan Liebig & Peter Valet & Jürgen Schupp, 2010. "Wahrgenommene Einkommensgerechtigkeit konjunkturabhängig," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(27/28), pages 11-16.
    7. Vanberg, Viktor J., 2005. "Marktwirtschaft und Gerechtigkeit. Zu F.A. Hayeks Kritik am Konzept der "sozialen Gerechtigkeit"," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 05/11, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schneider, Sebastian, 2014. "Varieties of capitalism, varieties of crisis response Bank bailouts in comparative perspective," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 21/2014, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:uwhdps:232011 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Maité Laméris & Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Anne-Marie Van Prooijen, 2019. "What have we done? The impact of choosing and studying different academic disciplines on beliefs and values," Working Papers CEB 19-007, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman & Eugenio Proto, 2014. "Smithian Growth through Creative Organization," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(5), pages 796-811, December.
    4. Gilat Levy & Ronnie Razin, 2009. "Religious Organizations," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 544, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    5. Gabrieli, Tommaso, "undated". "Beliefs And Redistributive Politics Under Incomplete Information," Economic Research Papers 269770, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    6. Ray Rees & Martin Nell & Helmut Gründl & Hato Schmeiser & Michael Wolgast, 2001. "Risikoübernahme - sollte der Staat bestimmte Versicherungsgarantien übernehmen?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(24), pages 5-14, October.
    7. Buechel, Berno & Krähenmann, Philemon, 2022. "Fixed price equilibria on peer‐to‐peer platforms: Lessons from time‐based currencies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 335-358.
    8. Volker Arnold, 2009. "Vom Sollen zum Wollen –über neuere Entwicklungen in der Wirtschaftsethik," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(3), pages 253-265, August.
    9. Tim Krieger & Christine Meemann & Stefan Traub, 2022. "Inequality, Life Expectancy, and the Intragenerational Redistribution Puzzle - Some Experimental Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 9677, CESifo.
    10. Bouma, J.A. & Nguyen, Binh & van der Heijden, Eline & Dijk, J.J., 2018. "Analysing Group Contract Design Using a Lab and a Lab-in-the-Field Threshold Public Good Experiment," Discussion Paper 2018-049, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    11. Kuhn, Andreas, 2011. "In the eye of the beholder: Subjective inequality measures and individuals' assessment of market justice," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 625-641.
    12. Marcel Preuss & Germ'an Reyes & Jason Somerville & Joy Wu, 2025. "Are Elites Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking? Evidence from MBA Students," Papers 2503.15443, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    13. Guner, Duygu & Uysal, Gokce, 2014. "Culture, Religiosity and Female Labor Supply," IZA Discussion Papers 8132, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Moisson, Paul-Henri, 2024. "Meritocracy and Inequality," TSE Working Papers 24-1518, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Apr 2024.
    15. Javier D. Donna, 2024. "Redistributive politics under ambiguity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 62(3), pages 583-607, May.
    16. Maite D. Laméris & Richard Jong-A-Pin & Rasmus Wiese, 2018. "An Experimental Test of the Validity of Survey-Measured Political Ideology," CESifo Working Paper Series 7139, CESifo.
    17. Erik Lindqvist & Robert Östling, 2013. "Identity and redistribution," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 469-491, June.
    18. Monica Bozzano & Simona Scabrosetti, 2024. "What Drives Gender Gaps in Preferences for Redistribution? New Evidence from the European Social Survey," Working papers 118, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    19. Nicolò Bellanca, 2007. "OSTACOLI ALLO SVILUPPO? VARIAZIONI SU UN TEMA DI ALBERT HIRSCHMAN (Ostacles to Development?)," Working Papers - Economics wp2007_03.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    20. Cappelen, Alexander W. & Cappelen, Cornelius & Tungodden, Bertil, 2018. "Second-best fairness under Limited information: The trade-off between false positives and false negatives," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 18/2018, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    21. Prüfer, Jens & Xu, Y., 2021. "The Nonprofit's Dilemma," Other publications TiSEM 237785b1-929d-40db-872f-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:uwhdps:232012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wfwitde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.