IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/uwhdps/232012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zur Beziehung von Akzeptanz, Gerechtigkeit und Leistungsfähigkeit der sozialen Marktwirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Sauerland, Dirk

Abstract

Nicht nur vor dem Hintergrund der aktuellen Umfragen ist die Fragestellung des vorliegenden Beitrags dreiteilig. Zunächst geht es um die Frage, was wir über die Akzeptanz der sozialen Marktwirtschaft eigentlich wissen - und wie die empirisch ermittelte Akzeptanz sich zur theoretisch begründbaren verhält. In einem zweiten Schritt soll analysiert werden, welche Rolle die (wahrgenommenen) Gerechtigkeit als Determinante der Akzeptanz spielt. Auch hier gibt es eine wirtschaftstheoretische Perspektive und eine empirische. In der Zusammenfassung werden Akzeptanz bzw. Gerechtigkeit der Leistungsfähigkeit der sozialen Marktwirtschaft gegenübergestellt und ihre mögliche Interdependenz diskutiert - auch anhand von empirischen Daten. Die systematische Analyse der möglichen Ursachen der Akzeptanz einer Wirtschaftsordnung ist notwendig, um mögliche (wirtschafts-)politische Ansatzpunkte und Transmissionsmechanismen zur Verbesserung der Akzeptanz der Wirtschaftsordnung zu finden. Der Ausblick beinhaltet daher Hinweise auf solche Ansatzpunkte Diese zu finden ist insbesondere dann sinnvoll, wenn die Akzeptanz die Leistungsfähigkeit bzw. Stabilität der Wirtschaftsordnung beeinflusst.

Suggested Citation

  • Sauerland, Dirk, 2012. "Zur Beziehung von Akzeptanz, Gerechtigkeit und Leistungsfähigkeit der sozialen Marktwirtschaft," Wittener Diskussionspapiere zu alten und neuen Fragen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft 23/2012, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Management and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:uwhdps:232012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/58245/1/716091917.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland Bénabou & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 699-746.
    2. Cipriani, Giam Pietro & Lubian, Diego & Zago, Angelo, 2009. "Natural born economists?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 455-468, June.
    3. Sinn, Hans-Werner, 1986. "Risiko als Produktionsfaktor," Munich Reprints in Economics 19879, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    4. Dominik H. Enste & Alexandra Haferkamp & Detlef Fetchenhauer, 2009. "Unterschiede im Denken zwischen Ökonomen und Laien – Erklärungsansätze zur Verbesserung der wirtschaftspolitischen Beratung," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(1), pages 60-78, February.
    5. Sauerland Dirk, 2004. "Die Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft: eine ordnungspolitische Analyse," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 55(1), pages 209-234, January.
    6. Stefan Liebig & Peter Valet & Jürgen Schupp, 2010. "Wahrgenommene Einkommensgerechtigkeit konjunkturabhängig," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(27/28), pages 11-16.
    7. Vanberg, Viktor J., 2005. "Marktwirtschaft und Gerechtigkeit. Zu F.A. Hayeks Kritik am Konzept der "sozialen Gerechtigkeit"," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 05/11, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schneider, Sebastian, 2014. "Varieties of capitalism, varieties of crisis response Bank bailouts in comparative perspective," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 21/2014, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:uwhdps:232011 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Maité Laméris & Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Anne-Marie Van Prooijen, 2019. "What have we done? The impact of choosing and studying different academic disciplines on beliefs and values," Working Papers CEB 19-007, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman & Eugenio Proto, 2014. "Smithian Growth through Creative Organization," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(5), pages 796-811, December.
    4. Gilat Levy & Ronnie Razin, 2009. "Religious Organizations," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 544, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    5. Gabrieli, Tommaso, 2007. "Beliefs And Redistributive Politics Under Incomplete Information," Economic Research Papers 269770, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    6. Ray Rees & Martin Nell & Helmut Gründl & Hato Schmeiser & Michael Wolgast, 2001. "Risk assumption - should the state guarantee some forms of insurance?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(24), pages 5-14, October.
    7. Buechel, Berno & Krähenmann, Philemon, 2022. "Fixed price equilibria on peer‐to‐peer platforms: Lessons from time‐based currencies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 335-358.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7fst0pcf5j8cr99e1nuobt97rn is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8813 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ronald Bachmann & Peggy Bechara & Sandra Schaffner, 2016. "Wage Inequality and Wage Mobility in Europe," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(1), pages 181-197, March.
    11. Zhang, Yingqiang & Eriksson, Tor, 2010. "Inequality of opportunity and income inequality in nine Chinese provinces, 1989-2006," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 607-616, December.
    12. Volker Arnold, 2009. "Vom Sollen zum Wollen –über neuere Entwicklungen in der Wirtschaftsethik," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(3), pages 253-265, August.
    13. Ooghe, Erwin & Peichl, Andreas, 2010. "Fair and Efficient Taxation under Partial Control: Theory and Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 5388, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Meier, Volker & Schiopu, Ioana, 2020. "Enrollment expansion and quality differentiation across higher education systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 43-53.
    15. Alessandra Fogli & Laura Veldkamp, 2007. "Nature or nurture? learning and female labor force dynamics," Staff Report 386, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    16. Karla Hoff & Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2010. "Equilibrium Fictions: A Cognitive Approach to Societal Rigidity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 141-146, May.
    17. Elvire Guillaud, 2013. "Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, March.
    18. Tim Krieger & Christine Meemann & Stefan Traub, 2022. "Inequality, Life Expectancy, and the Intragenerational Redistribution Puzzle - Some Experimental Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 9677, CESifo.
    19. Bouma, J.A. & Nguyen, Binh & van der Heijden, Eline & Dijk, J.J., 2018. "Analysing Group Contract Design Using a Lab and a Lab-in-the-Field Threshold Public Good Experiment," Discussion Paper 2018-049, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Guido Tabellini, 2007. "The Scope of Cooperation: Norms and Incentives," Levine's Working Paper Archive 321307000000000866, David K. Levine.
    21. Kuhn, Andreas, 2011. "In the eye of the beholder: Subjective inequality measures and individuals' assessment of market justice," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 625-641.
    22. He, Simin, 2019. "Minority advantage and disadvantage in competition and coordination," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 464-482.
    23. Thomas Straubhaar, 2018. "Universal Basic Income – New Answer to New Questions for the German Welfare State in the 21st Century," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(03), pages 03-09, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:uwhdps:232012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wfwitde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.