IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

One best way oder Varietät? Strategischer und organisatorischer Wandel von Großunternehmen im Prozess der Internationalisierung

Author

Listed:
  • Beyer, Jürgen

Abstract

Bestimmte Organisationsmuster und strategische Orientierungen von Unternehmen werden unter den neuen Rahmenbedingungen einer globalisierten Weltökonomie als nicht mehr zeitgemäß angesehen. Entwickelt sich im Prozess der Internationalisierung demnach ein einheitlicher Unternehmenstypus, der sich unter den neuen Kontextbedingungen als besonders geeignet herausstellt und verbreitet? Die Analyse der strategischen und organisatorischen Entwicklung deutscher Großunternehmen im Zeitraum seit 1986 spricht gegen diese Annahme. Es zeigt sich zwar, dass sich das strategische Optionsfeld durch die weit gehende Verdrängung einer auf den nationalen Raum begrenzten Strategie und der exportorientierten Internationalisierungsvariante verengt hat. Da aber gleichzeitig der ehemals gegebene Zusammenhang zwischen Strategie und Struktur geschwunden ist, kann auf organisatorischer Ebene keine Konvergenz festgestellt werden. Die Internationalisierung der Unternehmen begünstigt demnach weder die Ausbildung bestimmter formaler Organisationsstrukturen (wie z.B. die Matrixorganisation) noch befördert sie hinsichtlich der Koordinierung der Betriebseinheiten einheitlich eine De- oder Re-Zentralisierung der Unternehmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Beyer, Jürgen, 2001. "One best way oder Varietät? Strategischer und organisatorischer Wandel von Großunternehmen im Prozess der Internationalisierung," MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43720/1/33096156X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Hall & Maurice A. Saias, 1980. "Strategy follows structure!," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 149-163, April.
    2. James R. Markusen & Anthony J. Venables, 2021. "The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multi-national trade," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: BROADENING TRADE THEORY Incorporating Market Realities into Traditional Models, chapter 4, pages 69-94, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Lenn Gomes & Kannan Ramaswamy, 1999. "An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship Between Multinationality and Performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 30(1), pages 173-187, March.
    4. Gunnar Hedlund, 1984. "Organization in-Between: The Evolution of the Mother-Daughter Structure of Managing Foreign Subsidiaries in Swedish MNCS," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 15(2), pages 109-123, June.
    5. William G. Egelhoff, 1988. "Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: A revision of the stopford and wells model," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Naschold, Frieder & Jürgens, Ulrich & Lippert, Inge & Renneke, Leo, 1999. "Vom chandlerianischen Unternehmensmodell zum Wintelismus: Ausgangsüberlegungen für ein Projektvorhaben über veränderte Governanceformen in der internationalen InfoCom und Automobilindustrie," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Regulation of Work FS II 99-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Thomas W Malnight, 1996. "The Transition from Decentralized to Network-Based MNC Structures: An Evolutionary Perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 27(1), pages 43-65, March.
    8. John Dunning, 1981. "Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: Towards a dynamic or developmental approach," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 117(1), pages 30-64, March.
    9. Härdle, Wolfgang & Marron, J. & Yang, L., 1996. "Discussion," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1996,65, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    10. Henry Mintzberg, 1990. "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 171-195, March.
    11. Vernon, Raymond, 1979. "The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 41(4), pages 255-267, November.
    12. John D. Daniels & Robert A. Pitts & Marietta J. Tretter, 1985. "Organizing for dual strategies of product diversity and international expansion," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 223-237, July.
    13. Michael Borrus & John Zysman, 1997. "Globalization With Borders," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 141-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xufei Ma & Andrew Delios & Shu Yu, 2020. "Innovation in MNC’S strategy and structure: the (re) emergence of host country headquarters in large emerging markets," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 609-632, September.
    2. Nikolay Mihaylov, 2016. "Practical Dimensions of the Debate Strategy vs Structure of Trace Group Hold AD," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 2(2), pages 129-138.
    3. Paul Brenton & Francesca Di Mauro & Matthias Lücke, 2014. "Economic Integration and FDI: An Empirical Analysis off Foreign Investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: INTERNATIONAL TRADE, DISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT Empirical Studies of Trade Policies, chapter 7, pages 125-151, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. repec:got:cegedp:58 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Molina-Azorín, José F., 2012. "Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 993-1002.
    6. Abdul Karim, Noor Al-Huda & Winters, Paul C. & Coelli, Tim J. & Fleming, Euan M., 2003. "Foreign Direct Investment in Manufacturing Sector in Malaysia," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57903, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Justin Paul & Gurmeet Singh, 2017. "The 45 years of foreign direct investment research: Approaches, advances and analytical areas," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(11), pages 2512-2527, November.
    8. Nicole Franziska Richter, 2014. "Information Costs in International Business: Analyzing the Effects of Economies of Scale, Cultural Diversity and Decentralization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 171-193, April.
    9. Alexander T. Nicolai & Thomas W. Thomas, 2004. "Kapitalmarktkonforme Unternehmensführung: Eine Analyse im Lichte der jüngeren Strategieprozesslehre," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 452-469, August.
    10. Anwar, Sajid & Nguyen, Lan Phi, 2011. "Foreign direct investment and export spillovers: Evidence from Vietnam," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 177-193, April.
    11. Michael J. Enright & Venkat Subramanian, 2007. "An organizing framework for MNC subsidiary typologies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 895-924, December.
    12. Bojidar Hadjiev, 2010. "Reengineering Systems and Models for Industrial Organizations’ Internationalization (IO)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 54-97.
    13. Celo, Sokol & Nebus, James & Kim Wang, I., 2015. "MNC structure, complexity, and performance: Insights from NK methodology," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 182-199.
    14. CASTANER, Xavier & GENC, Mehmet, 2004. "Country Institutional Differences and Multinational Advantage in Banking," HEC Research Papers Series 792, HEC Paris.
    15. Sardor Tadjiev & Pierre-Yves Donze, 2020. "Daewoo Motors (1992-1999)A dragon multinational in the car industry," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 20-15, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    16. J. C. Sharmiladevi, 2017. "Understanding Dunning’s OLI Paradigm," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 8(3), pages 47-52, September.
    17. Lin, Hui-Lin & Hsiao, Yi-Chi & Lin, Eric S., 2015. "The choice between standard and non-standard FDI production strategies for Taiwanese multinationals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 283-293.
    18. Zander, Ivo, 1998. "The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational corporation--dispersion, duplication and potential advantages from multinationality," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 17-35, May.
    19. Alexandros Ragoussis, 2011. "The investment development path in space," Post-Print hal-00670756, HAL.
    20. Manuelli, A., 1999. "Direct foreign investment and export : the case of Italy and its small enterprises," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19038, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    21. Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Tobias Kretschmer & Jacques Bughin, 2021. "Digital is Strategy: The Role of Digital Technology Adoption in Strategy Renewal," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/325553, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.