IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/efisdi/22008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wirtschaftsstrukturen und Produktivität im internationalen Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Belitz, Heike
  • Clemens, Marius
  • Gornig, Martin

Abstract

Deutschland hat sein Produktionsportfolio zugunsten forschungsintensiver Güter und wissensintensiver Leistungen weiter verbessert. Wichtigste Stütze dieser Wirtschaftsstruktur sind Branchen aus dem Bereich hochwertiger Technologien. Bei Spitzentechnologien und wissensintensiven Dienstleistungen erreicht Deutschland einen durchschnittlichen Anteil. Weniger ausgeprägt ist dabei die IKTProduktion bzw. der Finanzsektor. Stärken liegen in diesen Bereichen hingegen im Luft- und Raumfahrzeugbau und den unternehmensorientierten Dienstleistungen. Mit diesem Produktionsportfolio war Deutschland auf den internationalen Märkten sehr erfolgreich. Die hohe Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Unternehmen und die gute Weltkonjunktur trieben in den letzten Jahren auch das gesamtwirtschaftliche Wachstum in Deutschland an. Mit Beginn der Finanzkrise im letzten Herbst hat sich die Weltkonjunktur dramatisch abgekühlt. Über alle Branchen hinweg ist die Investitionsnachfrage rückläufig. Die bis dato wichtigsten Wachstumsbranchen aus dem Bereich der hochwertigen Technologien rechnen nun für 2009 mit besonders starken Produktionsrückgängen. Dennoch ist Deutschland mittel- und langfristig mit seinem Spezialisierungsmuster im internationalen Vergleich gut aufgestellt. Für diese Einschätzung sprechen mehrere der hier vorgelegten Analyseergebnisse.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Belitz, Heike & Clemens, Marius & Gornig, Martin, 2008. "Wirtschaftsstrukturen und Produktivität im internationalen Vergleich," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 2-2008, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:22008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/156507/1/StuDIS_2008-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel P. Timmer & Mary O’Mahony & Bart van Ark, 2007. "EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 14, pages 71-85, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belitz, Heike & Clemens, Marius & Gornig, Martin & Mölders, Florian & Schiersch, Alexander & Schumacher, Dieter, 2011. "Die deutsche forschungsintensive Industrie in der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise im internationalen Vergleich," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 4-2011, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Timo Mitze & Björn Alecke, 2011. "Welche Rolle spielt externes Wissen für die sektorale Technologieentwicklung?: Eine empirische Analyse zur Identifikation intersektoraler FuE-Spillovers," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(3), pages 167-180.
    3. Belitz, Heike & Schmidt-Ehmcke, Jens & Zloczysti, Petra, 2009. "Forschung und Entwicklung deutscher Unternehmen im Ausland," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 9-2009, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    4. Polt, Wolfgang & Berger, Martin & Boekholt, Patries & Cremers, Katrin & Egeln, Jürgen & Gassler, Helmut & Hofer, Reinhold & Rammer, Christian & Deuten, Jasper & Good, Barbara & Warta, Katharina, 2010. "Das deutsche Forschungs- und Innovationssystem: Ein internationaler Sytemvergleich zur Rolle von Wissenschaft, Interaktionen und Governance für die technologische Leistungsfähigkeit," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2010, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    5. EFI - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (ed.), 2008. "Research, innovation and technological performance in Germany - EFI Report 2008," Reports on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin, volume 127, number 2008e, March.
    6. Allmendinger, Jutta, 2009. "Frauen auf dem Sprung: Wie junge Frauen heute leben wollen - Die BRIGITTE-Studie," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 214895, July.
    7. EFI - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (ed.), 2009. "Research, innovation and technological performance in Germany - EFI Report 2009," Reports on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin, volume 127, number 2009e, March.
    8. EFI - Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (ed.), 2008. "Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2008," Reports on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin, volume 127, number 2008, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Molnárová, Zuzana & Reiter, Michael, 2022. "Technology, demand, and productivity: What an industry model tells us about business cycles," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Georges Daw, 2022. "Determinants of Wealth Disparities in the EU: A Multi-scale Development Accounting Investigation," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 64(2), pages 211-254, June.
    3. Kyoji Fukao, 2013. "Explaining Japan's Unproductive Two Decades," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 8(2), pages 193-213, December.
    4. Dariusz Kotlewski, 2022. "Przesłanki za wykorzystaniem rachunkowości wzrostu gospodarczego w badaniu specjalizacji regionalnych," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 235-258.
    5. Tero Kuusi, 2015. "The dynamics of ICT adaptation and the productivity gaps across advanced nations," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 175-188, October.
    6. International Monetary Fund, 2009. "Spain: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2009/129, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Gregory Corcos & Massimo Del Gatto & Giordano Mion & Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, 2012. "Productivity and Firm Selection: Quantifying the ‘New’ Gains from Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 122(561), pages 754-798, June.
    8. Galstyan, Vahagn & Lane, Philip R., 2009. "Fiscal Policy and International Competitiveness: Evidence from Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 40(3), pages 299-315.
    9. Jaroslav Sixta & Kristýna Vltavská, 2016. "Změny v měření ekonomiky a dopady do odhadu produktivity [Changes in the Measuring of Economy and Its Impact on Productivity Estimation]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 351-368.
    10. Clayton, Tony & Dal Borgo, Mariela & Haskel, Jonathan, 2009. "An Innovation Index Based on Knowledge Capital Investment: Definition and Results for the UK Market Sector," IZA Discussion Papers 4021, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Delphine Irac & Jimmy Lopez, 2015. "Euro area structural convergence? A multi-criterion cluster analysis," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 143, pages 1-22.
    12. Bert M. Balk, 2010. "An Assumption‐Free Framework For Measuring Productivity Change," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(s1), pages 224-256, June.
    13. Robert Inklaar & Marcel P. Timmer & Bart van Ark, 2008. "Data for Productivity Measurement in Market Services: An International Comparison," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 16, pages 72-81, Spring.
    14. Martin Bijsterbosch & Marcin Kolasa, 2010. "FDI and productivity convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: an industry-level investigation," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 689-712, January.
    15. Martin Schneider, 2014. "Labor Productivity Developments in Austria in an International Perspective," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 3, pages 13-35.
    16. Einiö, Elias, 2016. "The loss of production work: evidence from quasiexperimental identification of labour demand functions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69019, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Pamfili Antipa & Marie-Elisabeth de la Serve, 2010. "International Comparisons of Industry-based Productivity Levels in the Financial and Business Service Sectors," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 19, pages 66-81, Spring.
    18. Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel, 2023. "Accounting for the slowdown in UK innovation and productivity," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 780-812, July.
    19. Claudia Olivetti & Barbara Petrongolo, 2011. "Gender Gaps Across Countries and Skills: Supply, Demand and the Industry Structure," CEP Discussion Papers dp1093, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    20. Krenz, Astrid & Prettner, Klaus & Strulik, Holger, 2021. "Robots, reshoring, and the lot of low-skilled workers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:22008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-fi.de/index.php?id=1&L=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.