IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/182020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects

Author

Listed:
  • Holzapfel, Sarah
  • Römling, Cornelia

Abstract

Monitoring and evaluation have gained importance in recent decades in development cooperation to increase evidence, and thereby aid effectiveness. However, the focus on measuring results needs to be coordinated with other strategically important aspects of the aid and development effectiveness agenda, such as adapting to local needs and harmonisation among development actors. Combining these different goals remains a challenge in the development community. Studies show that most donors have similar problems when measuring results. The quality of the collected data can oftentimes be questioned because data collection methods lack methodological rigor. The data collected and used is often of limited relevance for the project. Reporting by implementing agencies to BMZ focusses more on accountability than on using the results for learning. This discussion paper offers an in-depth analysis of the efforts undertaken by German bilateral development cooperation actors to measure results and in how far the reported data can contribute to increase the effectiveness of development cooperation. Thirteen projects by German implementing agencies GIZ and KfW were selected and analysed by means of project documents and interviews with staff. In addition, general monitoring and evaluation guidelines of German development cooperation were consulted. The results show that BMZ does not have a comprehensive results-based management system in place for planning, monitoring and evaluation in German development cooperation, which leads to quality challenges with regard to the collected data. Many projects do not have a comprehensive theory of change, use methodologically contestable indicators and are not able to demonstrate causality between their activities and the results measured. Indicators are often selected with only the limited involvement of partner countries, and there are challenges with using partner countries' secondary data. BMZ has recently started a reform process with the aim of establishing a more comprehensive RBM system and providing additional guidance to projects on how to define indicators and measure results. The findings of this paper offer important lessons learnt and recommendations for the reform process.

Suggested Citation

  • Holzapfel, Sarah & Römling, Cornelia, 2020. "Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:182020
    DOI: 10.23661/dp18.2020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/222620/1/172570837X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/dp18.2020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuel Skoufias & Susan Wendy Parker, 2001. "Conditional Cash Transfers and Their Impact on Child Work and Schooling: Evidence from the PROGRESA Program in Mexico," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2001), pages 45-96, August.
    2. Sarah Holzapfel, 2016. "Boosting or Hindering Aid Effectiveness? An Assessment of Systems for Measuring Donor Agency Results," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(1), pages 3-19, February.
    3. Abdel-Malek, Talaat, 2015. "The global partnership for effective development cooperation: origins, actions and future prospects," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 88, number 88, July.
    4. David Dollar & Craig Burnside, 2000. "Aid, Policies, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 847-868, September.
    5. Stoffel, Tim, 2020. "Socially responsible public procurement (SRPP) in multi-level regulatory frameworks: Assessment report on policy space for SRPP regulation and implementation in Germany and Kenya," IDOS Discussion Papers 9/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Janet Vähämäki & Chantal Verger, 2019. "Learning from Results-Based Management evaluations and reviews," OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers 53, OECD Publishing.
    7. Erforth, Benedikt, 2020. "The future of European development banking: What role and place for the European Investment Bank?," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Mayne, John, 2008. "Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect," ILAC Briefs 52525, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative.
    9. Schwegmann, Claudia & Holzapfel, Sarah, 2018. "Data for development: an agenda for German development cooperation," Briefing Papers 12/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Müngersdorff, Maximilian & Stoffel, Tim, 2020. "Strategies to strengthen socially responsible public procurement practices in German municipalities: A mapping exercise," IDOS Discussion Papers 8/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eppler, Mirko & Gaetani, Stella & Köllner, Francy & Kuhnt, Jana & Martin-Shields, Charles & Mebrahtu, Nyat & Peters, Antonia & Preiß, Carlotta, 2020. "Information and communication technology in the lives of forcibly displaced persons in Kenya," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Fischer, Roger A., 2020. "How the G7 reviews its work on development: A case study of internal accountability," IDOS Discussion Papers 19/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Bypassing Government: Aid Effectiveness and Malawi’s Local Development Fund," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 103-116.
    4. Mitsuaki Furukawa, 2018. "Management of the international development aid system: The Case of Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 270-284, March.
    5. von Haldenwang, Christian, 2020. "Digitalising the fiscal contract: An interdisciplinary framework for empirical inquiry," IDOS Discussion Papers 20/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Magdalena Proczek & Ewa Osuch-Rak, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Development Aid – EU as a Leader?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 583-600.
    7. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    8. Guillaumont, Patrick & Guillaumont Jeanneney, Sylviane & Wagner, Laurent, 2017. "How to Take into Account Vulnerability in Aid Allocation Criteria and Lack of Human Capital as Well: Improving the Performance Based Allocation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 27-40.
    9. Dreher, Axel & Fuchs, Andreas & Langlotz, Sarah, 2019. "The effects of foreign aid on refugee flows," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 127-147.
    10. Boockmann, Bernhard & Dreher, Axel, 2003. "The contribution of the IMF and the World Bank to economic freedom," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 633-649, September.
    11. B. Bhaskara Rao, 2010. "Time-series econometrics of growth-models: a guide for applied economists," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 73-86.
    12. Askarov, Zohid & Doucouliagos, Hristos, 2015. "Spatial aid spillovers during transition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PA), pages 79-95.
    13. Monica Beuran & Gaël Raballand & Julio Revilla, 2011. "Improving Aid Effectiveness in Aid-Dependent Countries: Lessons from Zambia," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11040, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    14. Hur, Yoon Sun & Kim, Milim, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Development Aid to Fragile, conflict, and violence (FCV) Countries: Do Modality and Sector Matter?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304216, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Uwaoma G. Nwaogu & Michael J. Ryan, 2015. "FDI, Foreign Aid, Remittance and Economic Growth in Developing Countries," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 100-115, February.
    16. Paul Collier & Anke Hoeffler, 2002. "AID, Policy and Peace: Reducing the risks of civil conflict," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 435-450.
    17. Eifert, Benn & Gelb, Alan, 2008. "Reforming Aid: Toward More Predictable, Performance-Based Financing for Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2067-2081, October.
    18. Kilby, Christopher & Dreher, Axel, 2010. "The impact of aid on growth revisited: Do donor motives matter?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 338-340, June.
    19. Stijn Claessens & Danny Cassimon, 2007. "Empirical evidence on the new international aid architecture," WEF Working Papers 0026, ESRC World Economy and Finance Research Programme, Birkbeck, University of London.
    20. Tadesse, Tasew, 2011. "Foreign aid and economic growth in Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 33953, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Sep 2011.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:182020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.