Is Executive Compensation Shaped by Public Attitudes?
In a competitive managerial labor market, compensation contracts should not depend on public attitudes or social norms regarding income inequality or 'fair pay'. In contrast to the standard view of optimal incentive design, we find that public opinion impacts executive compensation. We show that transient negative shocks to the public's view of executive pay leads to less total CEO pay, and to a shift away from options-based compensation and towards other types of pay. Furthermore, the level and composition of CEO pay also depends on persistent local social norms, such as state-level attitudes towards income inequality, or religiosity. For instance, in states where residents are likely to be more concerned with income inequality, CEO pay is lower across all types of compensation. Therefore, by changing the incentives faced by managers, social norms may influence executive decisions and ultimately, have an effect on real economic outcomes.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2008|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 0221 / 470 5607|
Phone: 0221 / 470 5607
Fax: 0221 / 470 5179
Web page: http://cfr-cologne.de/english/version06/html/home.php
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Bruce Ian Carlin & Simon Gervais, 2009. "Work Ethic, Employment Contracts, and Firm Value," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(2), pages 785-821, 04.
- DiNardo, John & Hallock, Kevin F. & Pischke, Jörn-Steffen, 2000.
"Unions and the Labor Market for Managers,"
IZA Discussion Papers
150, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Xavier Gabaix & Augustin Landier, 2008.
"Why has CEO Pay Increased So Much?,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Oxford University Press, vol. 123(1), pages 49-100.
- Dew-Becker, Ian & Gordon, Robert J, 2008.
"Controversies about the Rise in American Inequality: A Survey,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
6817, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Robert J. Gordon & Ian Dew-Becker, 2008. "Controversies about the Rise of American Inequality: A Survey," NBER Working Papers 13982, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hilary, Gilles & Hui, Kai Wai, 2009.
"Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America?,"
Journal of Financial Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 455-473, September.
- Gilles Hilary & Kai Wai Hui, 2009. "Does Religion Matter in Corporate Decision Making in America?," Post-Print hal-00481919, HAL.
- Kevin J. Murphy & Ján Zábojník, 2004. "CEO Pay and Appointments: A Market-Based Explanation for Recent Trends," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 192-196, May.
- Rafael Gomez & Konstantinos Tzioumis, 2006.
"What Do Unions Do to Executive Compensation?,"
CEP Discussion Papers
dp0720, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cfrwps:0809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.