IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance and Risk Measurement Challenges For Hedge Funds: Empirical Considerations


  • Peter Blum


  • Michel Dacorogna


  • Lars Jaeger

    (Partners Group)


Hedge funds are said to be rewarding investments because they have favourable risk-return characteristics on a standalone basis, and because they offer valuable diversification with respect to traditional stock and bond markets. On the other hand, hedge fund returns have a number of characteristics that make their quantitative analysis difficult: distributions are often asymmetric and have an increased tendency towards extreme outcomes ("heavy tails"), and dependence structures with respect to traditional markets are often complex. Moreover, quality and quantity of available data may be limited. In this study, we survey and present a number of quantitative analysis techniques that are able to cope with the particular characteristics of hedge funds, including methods for extreme value analysis and non- standard dependence models.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Blum & Michel Dacorogna & Lars Jaeger, 2003. "Performance and Risk Measurement Challenges For Hedge Funds: Empirical Considerations," Risk and Insurance 0311001, EconWPA.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpri:0311001
    Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on Win2000; to print on HP A4; pages: 20

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Michel M. Dacorogna, & Ulrich A. Muller & Olivier V. Pictet & Casper De Vries,, "undated". "The Distribution of Extremal Foreign Exchange Rate Returns in Extremely Large Data Sets," Working Papers 1992-10-22, Olsen and Associates.
    2. Peter Blum & Michel Dacorogna, 2003. "Dynamic Financial Analysis - Understanding Risk and Value Creation in Insurance," Risk and Insurance 0306002, EconWPA.
    3. H. A. Hauksson & M. Dacorogna & T. Domenig & U. Mller & G. Samorodnitsky, 2001. "Multivariate extremes, aggregation and risk estimation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 79-95.
    4. Bollerslev, Tim & Chou, Ray Y. & Kroner, Kenneth F., 1992. "ARCH modeling in finance : A review of the theory and empirical evidence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1-2), pages 5-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    hedge funds; risk measurement; risk management;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpri:0311001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.