IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpmi/9610004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Finding Cost of Natural Gas: Technological Change versus Resource Depletion

Author

Listed:
  • John T. Cuddington

    (Georgetown University)

  • Diana L. Moss

    (Office of Economic Policy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)

Abstract

This study provides an empirical analysis of the extent to which ongoing technological change has offset the effect of ongoing depletion on the cost of finding additional reserves of natural gas. In the process, we develop a new index of technological change for exploration and development (E&D) activities in the natural gas industry by identifying new technologies by year of diffusion using a detailed analysis of technical trade publications. Counting the number of technological diffusions in each year, one gets an indication of the rate of technological advance over time. The cumulative total is an indicator of the level of technology. Next, we motivate the inclusion of our measure of the current state of technology in the production function and the implied cost function for finding natural gas. This is done using alternative indices of capital obtained from the quality ladders and varieties models in the recent "endogenous growth" literature. Our estimated cost equations isolate the separate effects of depletion and technological improvement on the finding cost for natural gas. Counter factual simulations based on the cost functions suggest that technological change played a major role in allaying what would otherwise have been a sharp rise in production costs as additional reserves became harder and more expensive to find. Hence, our analysis provides empirical evidence of the common claim in the resource literature that technology has largely counteracted increasing resource scarcity in at least one nonrenewable resource sector, the natural gas industry.

Suggested Citation

  • John T. Cuddington & Diana L. Moss, 1996. "The Finding Cost of Natural Gas: Technological Change versus Resource Depletion," Microeconomics 9610004, EconWPA, revised 30 Jul 1998.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:9610004
    Note: Type of Document - WordPerfect; prepared on IBM PC ; to print on HP; pages: ; figures: included on jctables.wk4 and fig1_jc.pre. Economics Department, Georgetown University Office of Economic Policy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The views and findings expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and should not be attributed to the FERC.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/mic/papers/9610/9610004.html
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/mic/papers/9610/9610004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/mic/papers/9610/9610004.ps.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heal, Geoffrey M., 1993. "The optimal use of exhaustible resources," Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics,in: A. V. Kneeseā€  & J. L. Sweeney (ed.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 18, pages 855-880 Elsevier.
    2. Livernois, John R & Ryan, David L, 1989. "Testing for Non-jointness in Oil and Gas Exploration: A Variable Profit Function Approach," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 30(2), pages 479-504, May.
    3. Slade, Margaret E., 1982. "Trends in natural-resource commodity prices: An analysis of the time domain," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 122-137, June.
    4. Solow, Robert M, 1974. "The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Morton I. Kamien & Nancy L. Schwartz, 1978. "Optimal Exhaustible Resource Depletion with Endogenous Technical Change," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 179-196.
    6. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    7. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Fisher, Anthony C, 1982. "Exploration and Scarcity," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(6), pages 1279-1290, December.
    8. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Fisher, Anthony C, 1981. "Hotelling's "Economics of Exhaustible Resources": Fifty Years Later," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 65-73, March.
    9. Partha Dasgupta & Geoffrey Heal, 1974. "The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(5), pages 3-28.
    10. Livernois, John R & Uhler, Russell S, 1987. "Extraction Costs and the Economics of Nonrenewable Resources," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(1), pages 195-203, February.
    11. Hall, Alastair R, 1994. "Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series with Pretest Data-Based Model Selection," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 12(4), pages 461-470, October.
    12. Walls, Margaret A., 1992. "Modeling and forecasting the supply of oil and gas : A survey of existing approaches," Resources and Energy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 287-309, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    technological change; productivity growth; cost functions; quality ladders model; varieties model; nonrenewable resource depletion.;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • Q31 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • L71 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Mining, Extraction, and Refining: Hydrocarbon Fuels

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:9610004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: http://econwpa.repec.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.