The Social Impact of the Reform Process
The economic performance of Vietnam in the 1990s would be classified as a “miracle” if such achievements were not so common in Asia in the latter half of the twentieth century. GDP growth rates between 8.1 percent to 9.5 percent during 1992-97 were led by industry and services, though the agriculture sector growth also increased by an impressive 4.8 percent per annum. Transition, typically identified as “starting” in 1986, was a relatively painless affair of structural adjustment and stabilisation for the first decade. The state sector was never large in Vietnam, where 80 percent of the population lives in rural areas, mostly growing rice. By 1986 the planned part of the economy was thoroughly undermined, and inflation had eroded any monetary overhang. The collapse of the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) trading relationship forced restructuring in the modest state-owned enterprise sector, which shed almost one-quarter of its workforce. However, institutional reforms created a boom in the urban household economy that soaked up the unemployed. The shift in employment was relatively easy without the burden of a large military-industrial complex, and Vietnam’s exports to CMEA found new Western buyers with ease. Therefore, Vietnam did not experience a transitional crisis in trade or even in the rate of GDP growth. This success was largely because the planning system declined to a residual by 1988. The failure to rigorously implement the central planning model in the ten years after 1976 became a virtue for transition. The social consequences of transition were due to fundamental changes in incentive structures and regulations. This paper examines these consequences in several areas: food, poverty, land, employment, social protection systems, health and education.
|Date of creation:||11 Oct 2001|
|Note:||Type of Document - ; pages: 27; figures: included. Published in "Globalisation and Third World Socialism: Cuba and Vietnam" (Claes Brundenius and John Weeks eds.), 2001, Palgrave, UK.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://econwpa.repec.org|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Prescott, N., 1997. "Poverty, Social Services, and Safety Nets in Vietnam," World Bank - Discussion Papers 376, World Bank.
- Francisco H. G. Ferreira, 1999.
"Economic transition and the distributions of income and wealth,"
The Economics of Transition,
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 7(2), pages 377-410, July.
- Ferreira, Francisco H. G., 1997. "Economic transition and the distributions of income and wealth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1808, The World Bank.
- David O’Connor, 1996. "Labour Market Aspects of State Enterprise Reform in Viet Nam," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 117, OECD Publishing.
- Mallon, R. & Irvin, G.W., 1997. "Is the Vietnamese miracle in trouble?," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18994, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
- Horne, Jocelyn, 1995. "The Economics of Transition and the Transition of Economics," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(215), pages 379-92, December.
- Milanovic, Branko, 1998. "Explaining the increase in inequality during the transition," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1935, The World Bank.
- Krishna Srinivasan & Erich SpitÃ¤ller & M. Braulke & Christian B. Mulder & Hisanobu Shishido & Kenneth M. Miranda & John R Dodsworth & Keon Lee, 1996. "Vietnam; Transition to a Market Economy," IMF Occasional Papers 135, International Monetary Fund.
- Dollar David, 1994. "Macroeconomic Management and the Transition to the Market in Vietnam," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 357-375, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0110004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.