Restructuring of Enterprise Social Assets in Russia: Trends, Problems, Possible Solutions
Public enterprises in the formerly socialist countries have provided many social services to employees and the public, services that divert them from their core activities, raise their costs, and keep them from being competitive. How to deal with these social assets is a major problem in enterprise restructuring: large insolvent enterprises that provide many social services in a community often have the bargaining power to delay bankruptcy procedures and force the state to continue subsidizing them. But users of social services are not protected from enterprise managers'arbitrary actions or from a general deterioration in the level of services provided. As enterprises are restructured, the public sector must become involved in: 1) protecting critical services, such as kindergarten, that might otherwise disappear as enterprise funding is reduced; 2) facilitating reform of housing and health services, among others; 3) guaranteeing citizens'access to public services; and 4) reducing costs by rationalizing the management and provision of services. The authors analyze policy options in the restructuring of enterprises'social assets. They argue that the options differ depending on the benefits. Some benefits should remain as part of a traditional labor compensation package, and others should be privatized or transferred to municipal governments. Housing, especially, and child care facilities are services enterprises should not be in the business of providing.Divesting enterprises of housing is a transitional strategy on the way to transferring its ownership and management to the private sector. Unfortunately, the rules of the game under which municipal governments divest enterprises of housing are nontransparent and entirely under municipal control, and vested interests have many ways to postpone or block divestiture - even though most enterprise managers welcome it because it will reduce their costs and administrative burden. Social spending by Russian enterprises repres
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
|Date of creation:||May 1996|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Catalog/PUB_ONLINE.htmlEmail:
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- S Estrin & M Schaffer & I.J. Singh, 1995. "The Provision of Social Benefits in State Owned," CEP Discussion Papers dp0223, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:iasawp:wp96052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.