IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/fdcbrc/s21693capp01.html

Uses Of Supermarket Scan Data In Demand Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Oral CAPPS

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Oral CAPPS, 1993. "Uses Of Supermarket Scan Data In Demand Analysis," Emerging Data Issues in Applied Food Demand Analysis; s21693capp01, S216, Food Demand and Consumption Behavior Regional Committee.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:fdcbrc:s21693capp01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/s216/93capp01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laitinen, Kenneth, 1978. "Why is demand homogeneity so often rejected?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 187-191.
    2. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Lesser, William H., 1986. "Experimental Price Variability and Consumer Response: Tracking Potato Sales with Scanners," Staff Papers 186131, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. R. P. Byron, 1970. "A Simple Method for Estimating Demand Systems under Separable Utility Assumptions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 37(2), pages 261-274.
    4. Bieri, Jurg & Janvry, Alain de, 1972. "Empirical Analysis of Demand Under Consumer Budgeting," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 251916.
    5. James S. Eales & Laurian J. Unnevehr, 1988. "Demand for Beef and Chicken Products: Separability and Structural Change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(3), pages 521-532.
    6. Ronald W. Ward, 1982. "Asymmetry in Retail, Wholesale, and Shipping Point Pricing for Fresh Vegetables," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(2), pages 205-212.
    7. William G. Tomek, 1985. "Limits on Price Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(5), pages 905-915.
    8. James P. Houck, 1977. "An Approach to Specifying and Estimating Nonreversible Functions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(3), pages 570-572.
    9. Chalfant, James A, 1987. "A Globally Flexible, Almost Ideal Demand System," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 5(2), pages 233-242, April.
    10. Oral Capps, 1989. "Utilizing Scanner Data to Estimate Retail Demand Functions for Meat Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 750-760.
    11. Henry W. Kinnucan & Olan D. Forker, 1987. "Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 285-292.
    12. William A. Barnett, 1979. "Theoretical Foundations for the Rotterdam Model," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 46(1), pages 109-130.
    13. Rudolf Wolffram, 1971. "Positivistic Measures of Aggregate Supply Elasticities: Some New Approaches—Some Critical Notes," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(2), pages 356-359.
    14. Gordon Anderson & Richard Blundell, 1983. "Testing Restrictions in a Flexible Dynamic Demand System: An Application to Consumers' Expenditure in Canada," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 50(3), pages 397-410.
    15. Oral Capps Jr. & Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., 1990. "Effect of Length of Time on Measured Demand Elasticities: The Problem Revisited," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 38(3), pages 499-512, November.
    16. Mountain, Dean C, 1988. "The Rotterdam Model: An Approximation in Variable Space," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 477-484, March.
    17. Moschini, GianCarlo & Green, R., 1994. "Separability in Demand Analysis: Untested Assumption of Tested Hypothesis?," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11279, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Meisner, James F., 1979. "The sad fate of the asymptotic Slutsky symmetry test for large systems," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 231-233.
    19. S. E. Pudney, 1981. "An Empirical Method of Approximating the Separable Structure of Consumer Preferences," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 48(4), pages 561-577.
    20. Thomas L. Cox & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1986. "Prices and Quality Effects in Cross-Sectional Demand Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 908-919.
    21. Deaton,Angus & Muellbauer,John, 1980. "Economics and Consumer Behavior," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521296762, January.
    22. Gregory, Allan W & Veall, Michael R, 1985. "Formulating Wald Tests of Nonlinear Restrictions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1465-1468, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giliola Frey & Matteo Manera, 2007. "Econometric Models Of Asymmetric Price Transmission," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 349-415, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kesavan, Thulasiram, 1988. "Monte Carlo experiments of market demand theory," ISU General Staff Papers 198801010800009854, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Capps, Oral, Jr., "undated". "Tests Of Weak Separability: The Case Of Disaggregated Meat Products," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271248, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 1992. "Scanner Data in Supermarkets: Untapped Data Source for Agricultural Economists," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 60(02), pages 1-8, August.
    4. Clements, Kenneth W. & Gao, Grace, 2015. "The Rotterdam demand model half a century on," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 91-103.
    5. Kenneth W. Clements & E. A. Selvanathan & Saroja Selvanathan, 1992. "Henri Theil’s Contributions to Demand Analysis," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ronald Bewley & Tran Hoa (ed.), Contributions to Consumer Demand and Econometrics, chapter 5, pages 74-104, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 2000. "New Varieties And The Returns To Commodity Promotion: The Case Of Fuji Apples," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(01), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Cotterill, Ronald W., 1994. "Scanner Data: New Opportunities For Demand And Competitive Strategy Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 1998. "New Varieties and the Returns to Commodity Promotion: Washington Fuji Apples," Working Papers 28541, Arizona State University, Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management.
    9. Lanfranco, Bruno A. & Ames, Glenn C.W. & Huang, Chung L., 2001. "Comparisons Of Hispanic Households' Demand For Meat With Other Ethnic Groups," Faculty Series 16710, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. AOUINI, Syrine & Gil, Jose M., "undated". "Innovation and Brand Effects on the Consumers’ Demand for Fresh Milk in Spain," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258131, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Piggott, Nicholas E. & Marsh, Thomas L., 2001. "Impacts of Food Safety on U.S. Meat Demand," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125781, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. James S. Eales & Laurian J. Unnevehr, 1988. "Demand for Beef and Chicken Products: Separability and Structural Change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(3), pages 521-532.
    13. Fousekis, Panos & Katrakilidis, Constantinos & Trachanas, Emmanouil, 2016. "Vertical price transmission in the US beef sector: Evidence from the nonlinear ARDL model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 499-506.
    14. Paul Cashin, 1991. "A Model Of The Disaggregated Demand For Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(3), pages 263-283, December.
    15. Anthony N. Rezitis, 2019. "Investigating price transmission in the Finnish dairy sector: an asymmetric NARDL approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 861-900, September.
    16. repec:isu:genstf:1993010108000011815 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Sun, Changyou, 2011. "Price dynamics in the import wooden bed market of the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 479-487, July.
    18. Karantininis, Kostas & Katrakylidis, Kostas & Persson, Morten, "undated". "Price Transmission in the Swedish Pork Chain: Asymmetric non linear ARDL," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114772, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Rezitis, Anthony N. & Tsionas, Mike, 2019. "Modeling asymmetric price transmission in the European food market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 216-230.
    20. Monia Ben-Kaabia & José M. Gil & Mehrez Ameur, 2005. "Vertical integration and non-linear price adjustments: The Spanish poultry sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 253-271.
    21. Henry de-Graft Acquah, 2013. "A Bootstrap Approach to Evaluating the Power of the Houck’s Test for Asymmetry," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(2), pages 69-73.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:fdcbrc:s21693capp01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.