IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Spatial inequalities in Russia: dynamic and sectoral analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Evgeniya Kolomak


The paper studies the evolution and determinants of spatial inequalities in Russia. We use database providing data on value-added, employment, education and population over set of Russian «subjects of Federation». These data cover period of 1995 - 2010 and several sectors: agriculture, manufacturing, service and construction. We study dynamics of the spatial inequalities and test the presence of agglomeration economies over the observed period. We use the Theil index to analyze the spatial distribution of economic activity allowing inequality across space to be captured at two geographical levels: subjects of Federation and macro-regions. The results of our analysis suggest that concentration of the economic activity continues in Russia and the pace of the interregional divergence is rather high. This fact brings to the conclusion that the country is at the left side of the bell-shaped relationship between the interaction costs and the spatial distribution. Both the Western and the Eastern parts experiences centripetal tendencies. However despite of predictions an essential redistribution of the production from the East to the West is not revealed. The first nature (highly valuated at the global market natural resources and raw materials of the East) is balanced by the second nature (better infrastructure and big markets of the West). In paper we seek the main factors lying behind the spatial evolution of economic activity in Russia over the observed period. To evaluate the magnitude of agglomeration economy we regress the logarithm of labor productivity on the logarithm of population per unit of surface area, as well as on a number of other explanatory variables: market potential, local specialization, sectoral diversity, share of skilled labor, time and region fixed effects. Our analysis provides evidence consistent with predictions of economic geography. The significant factors of the spatial concentration and the total productivity growth are density, size of and access to the markets along with the diversity of the economy. Specific of the Eastern regions is insensitivity to the diversification. There are also sectoral peculiarities: density of the population and proximity to the markets influence negatively agriculture; due to immobility of supply the external markets have no significant effect on construction. Sectoral specialization (because of fierce competition) decreases both the rate of concentration and the productivity. One of the practical ideas of the analysis is conclusion that in the nearest future we will observe further concentration of the economic activity and interregional divergence in Russia. Forces behind agglomeration economy and regional disparities are of market nature (increasing returns to scale and imperfect competition) and they start to play a major role in the country in the transition and the post-transition period.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa13p21.

in new window

Date of creation: Nov 2013
Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p21
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Lafourcade, Miren & Thisse, Jacques-François & Toutain, Jean-Claude, 2011. "The rise and fall of spatial inequalities in France: A long-run perspective," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 243-271, April.
  2. Berkowitz, Daniel & DeJong, David N., 2003. "Policy reform and growth in post-Soviet Russia," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 337-352, April.
  3. Rosés, Joan Ramón & Martínez-Galarraga, Julio & Tirado, Daniel A., 2010. "The upswing of regional income inequality in Spain (1860-1930)," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 244-257, April.
  4. Berkowitz, Daniel & DeJong, David N., 2002. "Accounting for growth in post-Soviet Russia," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 221-239, March.
  5. Rudiger Ahrend, 2005. "Speed of Reform, Initial Conditions or Political Orientation? Explaining Russian Regions' Economic Performance," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 289-317.
  6. Quah, Danny, 1997. "Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs," CEPR Discussion Papers 1586, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  7. Daniel Berkowitz & David N. DeJong, 2005. "Entrepreneurship and Post-socialist Growth," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 67(1), pages 25-46, 02.
  8. K.P. Gluschenko ( ), 2010. "Income inequality in Russian regions: comparative analysis," Journal "Region: Economics and Sociology", Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, vol. 4.
  9. Quah, Danny T, 1997. "Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 27-59, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.