IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Wage Assimilation of Immigrants: Which Factors Close the Gap? – Evidence from Germany

  • Florian Lehmer
  • Johannes Ludsteck


Using longitudinal employment register data this study analyzes the development of outcomes of male foreign workers from all important sending countries across time. Cohort analyses on persons entering the German labour market between 1995 and 2000 show significant differences in the assimilation processes between nationalities. We examine the sources of wage assimilation for migrants in Germany by estimating fixed effects regressions for migrants and Germans separately. Based on the estimated coefficients, we assess the contributions of the various right hand side variables to wage convergence between migrants compared to native Germans by generating predictions and by averaging them by year. This approach allows to decompose the wage adjustment of foreigners into three components: the adjustment due to observed time-varying characteristics as e.g. tenure or change of industries/occupations, the adjustment due to selectivity effects and a third component capturing the adjustment due to unobserved time-varying factors and age. If all migrants are tarred with the same brush (by pooling them into one group), we find that the raw wage gap (compared to native Germans) decreases from -50 percent in the year 2000 to -40 percent in 2008. According to the decomposition results this wage assimilation of 10 percentage points can almost completely be traced back to time-varying observable characteristics. Migrants increase their wages over time mainly by changing their workplaces into larger firms, by accumulating firm-specific human capital and by sorting themselves into better-paying industries and occupations. Furthermore, employment stability contributes to the wage convergence as well as changes to German citizenship. Selectivity- and age/trend- effects play only a minor role here. However, these results from a ‘one size fits all model’ pooling all migrants into one group mask considerably heterogeneity between countries. The large size of our data allows us to differentiate between 30 nationality groups. We observe that the wage assimilation is significantly higher for countries with a small entry wage gap compared to German natives. It turns out that a large proportion of the total wage adjustment can be explained by selectivity effects especially for migrants from countries with large wage increases whereas adjustment is mainly driven by time-varying observable characteristics for countries in the midfield of the adjustment ranking.. In summary, the nationality-specific results reveal considerable heterogeneity regarding adjustment and its causes, indicating that effective migrant policy should account for that by creating nationality-specific integration measures.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa12p262.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p262
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Dustmann, C, 1993. "Earnings Adjustment of Temporary Migrants," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 153-68, May.
  2. George J. Borjas, 1994. "The Economic Benefits from Immigration," NBER Working Papers 4955, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  3. David Card, 2005. "Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?," NBER Working Papers 11547, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Heywood, John S & Peoples, James H, Jr, 1994. "Deregulation and the Prevalence of Black Truck Drivers," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(1), pages 133-55, April.
  5. Diekmann, Andreas & Engelhardt, Henriette & Hartmann, Peter, 1993. "Einkommensungleichheit in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Diskriminierung von Frauen und Ausländern?," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 26(3), pages 386-398.
  6. Chiswick, Barry R, 1978. "The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born Men," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(5), pages 897-921, October.
  7. Michael Fertig & Stefanie Schurer, 2007. "Earnings Assimilation of Immigrants in Germany: The Importance of Heterogeneity and Attrition Bias," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 30, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  8. Alisher Aldashev & Johannes Gernandt & Stephan L. Thomsen, 2008. "The Immigrant Wage Gap in Germany," FEMM Working Papers 08019, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  9. Borjas, George J, 1987. "Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(4), pages 531-53, September.
  10. Gundel, Sebastian & Peters, Heiko, 2008. "Assimilation and cohort effects for German immigrants," CAWM Discussion Papers 6, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM), University of Münster.
  11. Pischke, Jörn-Steffen, 1992. "Assimilation and the earnings of guestworkers in Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 92-17, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
  12. Friedberg, Rachel M, 2000. "You Can't Take It with You? Immigrant Assimilation and the Portability of Human Capital," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(2), pages 221-51, April.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.