IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucl/cepeob/35.html

Raising the Esteem of Vocational Education and Training (VET) from Age 14

Author

Listed:
  • Robbie Maris

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Jake Anders

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Gill Wyness

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

Abstract

A strong post-16 education system needs credible pathways for young people with different interests, strengths and aspirations. High-quality vocational education and training (VET) can support engagement in education, provide occupationally relevant skills and facilitate transitions into skilled employment or further study. Having a full suite of strong, well-regarded post-16 pathways is important for reducing the risk of young people becoming not in education, employment or training (NEET). The recent Milburn Review underlines the urgency of this challenge. It finds that nearly one million young people aged 16-24 are not in education, employment or training and argues that the institutions intended to support the transition from education to work are failing to operate as a coherent system (Milburn, 2026). However, around the world, vocational education tends to be held in lower regard to its academic counterpart (e.g., Sim, 2024; UNESCO-UNEVOC, 2018; Wang, 2021). This is despite a growing recognition that vocational education can often deliver equivalent or better labour market returns in modern economies than purely academic education (Dahl et al., 2023; Kreisman and Stange, 2020; LaForest, 2023).While these perceptions partially reflect underlying differences in quality in some places, there is broad acknowledgement that there are socially constructed negative attitudes unrelated to the objective quality of VET (Ackehurst et al., 2022). That is, VET is stigmatised across many societies (Ackehurst et al., 2022; Aldossari, 2020; Chankseliani et al., 2016). This is a salient issue in the UK, where ``parity of esteem'' between vocational and academic education has become an enduring policy goal. The esteem of vocational pathways matters because perceptions shape choices. Students and families consider what qualifications signal about ability, status and future opportunities. Teachers and careers advisers influence who is encouraged towards different routes. Employers decide whether qualifications certify useful skills, while universities determine which qualifications provide access to desirable courses. Negative attitudes towards VET could be driving students to take courses or pathways that are not best suited to their aspirations, abilities and needs. Stigma may also affect students after they enter a vocational route. In Flanders, around one fifth of students in technical and vocational tracks reported that others looked down on them because of their studies, and this perceived contempt was strongly associated with feelings of futility even after accounting for ability and social background (Spruyt et al., 2015). VET stigma is also likely contributing to skills shortages in technical and vocational areas, hindering economic growth and productivity. This briefing focuses primarily on school- and college-based vocational and technical education for young people aged 14-18. Apprenticeships form an important part of the wider technical education system, but differ from the programmes considered here because they combine employment with formal training and are most commonly entered after compulsory schooling (DfE, 2026). They are therefore discussed principally as a progression destination and as the work-based counterpart to classroom-based technical routes, rather than as a central focus of the briefing.

Suggested Citation

  • Robbie Maris & Jake Anders & Gill Wyness, 2026. "Raising the Esteem of Vocational Education and Training (VET) from Age 14," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 35, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Jul 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-cepeo.ucl.ac.uk/cepeob/cepeobn35.pdf
    File Function: Initial version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Anders (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.