IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Death of Conservative Ireland? The 2018 Abortion Referendum


  • Johan A. Elkink

    (School of Politics & International Relations, University College Dublin)

  • David M. Farrell

    (School of Politics & International Relations, University College Dublin)

  • Sofie Marien

    (Center for Political Research, KU Leuven)

  • Theresa Reidy

    (Department of Government, University College Cork)

  • Jane Suiter

    (School of Communications, Dublin City University)


The outcomes of two recent Irish referendums - on marriage equality in 2015 and abortion in 2018 - have placed contemporary Irish voters in sharp contrast with their long-standing conservative Catholic reputation. These referendums also stand out internationally because of the associated deliberative innovation. This paper aims to explain the watershed abortion vote drawing on theories of generational change, issue-voting, cue-taking and deliberative democracy, using data from an exit poll at the 2018 abortion referendum. We show that age and cleavage effects are key to understanding the referendum outcome. These results offer insight into how societal processes such as rapid secularisation, generational replacement and democratic innovations shape politics. Moreover, voters who were aware of the deliberative innovation were more likely to support the liberal referendum option. To increase willingness to deviate from the status quo, engaging citizens actively in the debate is a fruitful approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan A. Elkink & David M. Farrell & Sofie Marien & Theresa Reidy & Jane Suiter, 2019. "The Death of Conservative Ireland? The 2018 Abortion Referendum," Working Papers 201911, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:201911

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Sascha O Becker & Thiemo Fetzer & Dennis Novy, 2017. "Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 32(92), pages 601-650.
    2. repec:cup:apsrev:v:88:y:1994:i:01:p:63-76_09 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    referendums; voting behaviour; abortion; generational effects; deliberative democracy; Ireland;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:201911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Geary Tech). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.