IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Marriage, Motherhood and Wages: Recent Evidence

Listed author(s):
  • Petra Bradler
  • Chun Yee Wong
Registered author(s):

    Using data from the 1982 National Longitudinal Survey for Young Women (NLSYW) we replicate Korenman and Neumark's (K&N) (1992) study "Marriage, Motherhood and Wages" and obtain similar OLS estimates. Applying IV estimation to account for the endogeneity of experience and tenure, K&N find evidence in favor of the endogeneity of and obtain more negative coefficients for the children coefficients. In the IV estimation we obtain experience and tenure coefficients which are not significantly different from the OLS estimates, hence rejecting the endogeneity. As in K&N's study, our first difference specification exhibits signs of heterogeneity bias. Sample selectivity bias is marginally evident in K&N's paper, whereas we do not find evidence in favor of it. We furthermore examine the development of wage differentials over time by looking at more recent NLSYW surveys (1987 and 1991). We find that as women age, experience, tenure and education become better predictors for wage differentials among women with different marital and fertility status.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: MainText
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: MainText
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Toronto, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number ecpap-96-05.

    in new window

    Length: 49 pages
    Date of creation: 15 Jul 1996
    Handle: RePEc:tor:tecipa:ecpap-96-05
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario

    Phone: (416) 978-5283

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Sanders Korenman & David Neumark, 1992. "Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 27(2), pages 233-255.
    2. Blackburn, McKinley L & Neumark, David, 1993. "Omitted-Ability Bias and the Increase in the Return to Schooling," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(3), pages 521-544, July.
    3. Moon-Kak Kim & Solomon W. Polachek, 1994. "Panel Estimates of Male-Female Earnings Functions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 29(2), pages 406-428.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tor:tecipa:ecpap-96-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RePEc Maintainer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.