IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20260033.html

Measuring Economic Impacts of Environmental Policy Transitions Across Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Blasques

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Siem Jan Koopman

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Anthony van Veen

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Ilka van de Werve

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the macroeconomic effects of environmental policy transitions using stringency scores from developed and emerging countries. We examine the economic effects of environmental policy transitions across market-based, non-market-based, and technology support policies, along with their aggregate effect captured by the Environmental Policy Stringency index. To assess the economic effects relative to a no-transition scenario, we apply the synthetic control estimation method to construct separate counterfactuals for each treated country and policy category. Our framework standardizes the selection of treatment countries, event years, predictor variables, and donor pools, and incorporates placebo tests to assess the significance of total economic losses. We find that most policy transitions are associated with short-term economic losses, particularly for non-market-based and technology support policies. Placebo tests reveal that technology support transitions generate the largest and most significant losses, while aggregated environmental policy transitions generate smaller but still significant losses. In contrast, market-based and non-market-based policies do not show significant economic effects. These findings highlight the heterogeneous economic responses to environmental policy transitions and demonstrate that, although short-term losses can be substantial, more stringent market-based and non-market-based policies do not inherently constrain long-term economic performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Blasques & Siem Jan Koopman & Anthony van Veen & Ilka van de Werve, 2026. "Measuring Economic Impacts of Environmental Policy Transitions Across Countries," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-033/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26033.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2023. "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023," World Bank Publications - Reports 39796, The World Bank Group.
    2. World Bank, 2023. "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing," World Bank Publications - Reports 40700, The World Bank Group.
    3. Adam B. Jaffe et al., 1995. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 132-163, March.
    4. Tomasz Kozluk & Vera Zipperer, 2014. "Environmental policies and productivity growth: a critical review of empirical findings," OECD Journal: Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2014(1), pages 155-185.
    5. Charlotte Burns & Paul Tobin, 2016. "The Impact of the Economic Crisis on European Union Environmental Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1485-1494, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tabak, Benjamin M. & Fulber, Ives Cezar & Froner, Matheus B., 2025. "The nexus between carbon, energy and agrifood—A contemporaneous and lagged spillover analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Fries, Steven, 2023. "Sequencing decarbonization policies to manage their macroeconomic impacts," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-26, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    3. Themann, Michael & Koch, Nicolas, 2021. "Catching up and falling behind: Cross-country evidence on the impact of the EU ETS on firm productivity," Ruhr Economic Papers 904, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Sanda, Masoyi Garba & Emam, Mohamed & Hassan, Hamdy, 2026. "Combined vertical axis wind turbine and solar photovoltaic energy generation on dual land use with shading impact: Technical-economic-environmental assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(PA).
    5. Liao, Ling & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2025. "The interplay of carbon offset, renewable energy certificate and electricity markets in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Mingie, James C., 2025. "Impact of cost assumptions on forest carbon targets and supply dynamics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Cristiana Tudor & Aura Girlovan & Robert Sova & Javier Sierra & Georgiana Roxana Stancu, 2025. "From Policy to Prices: How Carbon Markets Transmit Shocks Across Energy and Labor Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Richard Bullock & Martha Lawrence & Joanna Moody, 2023. "Unlocking Green Logistics for Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 40529, The World Bank Group.
    9. Yan MA & Morihiro YOMOGIDA, 2026. "Carbon Tariffs, Emissions Leakage, and Production Relocation," Discussion papers 26053, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    10. Amendola, Marco, 2025. "Winners and losers of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. An intra-EU issue?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Zhao, Yu & Gao, Gege & Zhang, Jixiang & Yu, Miao, 2024. "Impact of carbon tax on green building development: An evolutionary game analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Gui‐Hua Lin & Yang‐Ping Liu & Qi Zhang, 2024. "Strategic analysis of green technology unilateral licensing under carbon cap‐and‐trade policy," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 2646-2665, June.
    13. Azizov, Abboskhan, 2026. "Does Financial Development Reduce Emissions? The Role of Renewable Energy. Evidence from High-Governance Economies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 16(2), pages 730-742, January.
    14. Iida, Takeshi & Mukherjee, Arijit, 2025. "Environmental taxes, offshoring and welfare: The effects of environmental damage and pollution intensity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Bengochea-Morancho, Aurelia & Morales-Lage, Rafael, 2019. "Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    16. Husain, Shaiara & Sohag, Kazi & Wu, Yanrui, 2024. "Proven reserve oil and renewable energy nexus: Efficacy of policy stringency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Concaro, C. & Bompard, E.F. & Grosso, D. & Montemagni, G. & Viviani, A., 2026. "Multilayered assessment of a product’s greenness in the context of greenshoring strategies and carbon border taxation systems: an application to the iron and steel industry in the EU," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PD).
    18. Kakeu, Justin & Ziegler, Ethan & Holmes, Brandon, 2025. "Transforming Cap and Trade: Aligning Pollution Markets with Public Health Goals," RFF Issue Briefs 25-09, Resources for the Future.
    19. Fausto Corvino, 2025. "What could justify a prohibition on the luxury emissions of the very rich?," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 24(4), pages 313-333, November.
    20. repec:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:19:p:719-722 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Bigerna, Simona & D'Errico, Maria Chiara & Polinori, Paolo, 2020. "Heterogeneous impacts of regulatory policy stringency on the EU electricity Industry:A Bayesian shrinkage dynamic analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.