IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Appendix 4 : Relocation : What Matters ? Competition or/and Co-ordination

  • Michel Quéré

    (Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion)

  • Jean-Luc Gaffard

    (OFCE)

With respect to relocation (delocalisation) issues two attitudes can be contrasted. According to the most standard one, relocation does not create any problem when full competition prevails in product, labour, and capital markets. Changes in transportation and production costs may generate changes in location by firms in manufacturing industry at the benefit of less developed countries. In more developed countries, jobs are shifting from e.g. manufacturing to services industry, and the negative impact on households’ purchasing power of lower nominal wages, if any, will be more than offset by lower prices of imported final goods. Unemployment will be frictional and temporary, unless market labour rigidities prevent the necessary jobs’ shifting. According to a different perspective, relocation may become a real issue when considering it as an aspect of a process of creative destruction that necessarily results in local distortions in the structure of productive capacity and hence in market disequilibria. In the latter perspective, relocation can no longer be viewed as an equilibrium phenomenon. It may be associated with an increasing rate of unemployment and make it necessary for public authorities to intervene. In fact, all depends on the way co-ordination issues are dealt with. But focusing on attractiveness and competitiveness of territories may lead public authorities to implicitly consider international trade as a zero (or negative) sum game and implement supply side oriented policies that are fundamentally misconceived and could increase market disequilibria. Thus it is necessary to consider how production location really takes place out of equilibrium and how relocation may end in a quasi-dynamic equilibrium. Public interventions are required, which consist in combining structural and macroeconomic policies, the former being efficient only if the latter are growth oriented. The aim of this paper is precisely to argue according to the latter perspective.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/5062/resources/appendix4-gaffard-quere.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Sciences Po in its series Sciences Po publications with number info:hdl:2441/5062.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Mar 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5062
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.sciencespo.fr/

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Martin, Philippe & I.P. Ottaviano, Gianmarco, 1999. "Growing locations: Industry location in a model of endogenous growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 281-302, February.
  2. Krugman, Paul & Venables, Anthony J., 1995. "Globalization and the Inequality of Nations," Working Paper Series 430, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  3. Devereux, Michael B & Head, Allen C & Lapham, Beverly J, 1996. "Monopolistic Competition, Increasing Returns, and the Effects of Government Spending," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(2), pages 233-54, May.
  4. Francesco Saraceno, 2005. "Demand Shocks and Intertemporal Coordination: A Two Country Model," The IUP Journal of Monetary Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 51 - 75, May.
  5. Robert E Lucas, 1999. "Making a Miracle," Levine's Working Paper Archive 2101, David K. Levine.
  6. Amendola, Mario & Gaffard, Jean-Luc, 1998. "Out of Equilibrium," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198293804, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Spire @ Sciences Po Library)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.