IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/shf/wpaper/2007009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Institutions, Inequality and Religious Beliefs Affect Cadaveric versus Live- Kidney Harvesting

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Caglayan
  • Nejat Anbarci

    () (Department of Economics, The University of Sheffield)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Caglayan & Nejat Anbarci, 2007. "Do Institutions, Inequality and Religious Beliefs Affect Cadaveric versus Live- Kidney Harvesting," Working Papers 2007009, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics, revised May 2007.
  • Handle: RePEc:shf:wpaper:2007009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.shef.ac.uk/economics/research/serps/articles/2007_09.html
    File Function: Revised version, 2007
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buscaglia, Edgardo & Stephan, Paul B., 2005. "An empirical assessment of the impact of formal versus informal dispute resolution on poverty: A governance-based approach," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 89-106, March.
    2. Kaufmann, Daniel & Kraay, Aart & Mastruzzi, Massimo, 2005. "Governance matters IV : governance indicators for 1996-2004," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3630, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cadaveric vs. live kidney transplants; inequality; rule of law; religion;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:shf:wpaper:2007009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jacob Holmes). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/desheuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.