IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-09-29.pdf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Forest Inventories: Discrepancies and Uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Waggoner, Paul E.

Abstract

Credits for sequestered carbon augment forests’ already considerable value as natural habitat and as producers of timber and biomass, making their accurate inventory more critical than ever before. This article examines discrepancies in inventories of forest attributes and their sources in four variables: area, timber volume per area, biomass per timber volume, and carbon concentration. Documented discrepancies range up to a multibillion-ton difference in the global stock of carbon in trees. Because the variables are multiplied together to estimate an attribute like carbon stock, more precise measurement of the most certain variable improves accuracy little, and a 10 percent error in biomass per timber levers a discrepancy as much as a mistake in millions of hectares. More precise measurements of, say, accessible stands cannot remedy inaccuracies from biased sampling of regional forests. The discrepancies and uncertainties documented here underscore the obligation to improve monitoring of global forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Waggoner, Paul E., 2009. "Forest Inventories: Discrepancies and Uncertainties," Discussion Papers dp-09-29.pdf, Resources For the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-09-29.pdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-09-29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 1962. "Handbook of Agriculture," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 17(2), pages 1-3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Molly Macauley & Roger Sedjo, 2011. "Forests in climate policy: technical, institutional and economic issues in measurement and monitoring," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 499-513, June.
    2. Nathan Richardson & Molly Macauley, 2012. "Forest Carbon Economics: What We Know, What We Do Not And Whether It Matters," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(04), pages 1-18.
    3. Sloggy, Matthew R. & Kling, David M. & Plantinga, Andrew J., 2020. "Measure twice, cut once: Optimal inventory and harvest under volume uncertainty and stochastic price dynamics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Fortmannm Lea & Salas, Paula Cordero & Sohngen, Brent & Roe, Brian, 2014. "Incentive contracts for environmental services and their potential in REDD," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6829, The World Bank.
    5. Köhl, Michael & Neupane, Prem Raj & Mundhenk, Philip, 2020. "REDD+ measurement, reporting and verification – A cost trap? Implications for financing REDD+MRV costs by result-based payments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Fortmann, Lea & Cordero-Salas, Paula & Sohngen, Brent & Brian, Roe, 2016. "Incentive Contracts for Environmental Services and their Potential in REDD," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 9(3-4), pages 363-409, September.
    7. Epede, Mesumbe Bianca & Wang, Daoping, 2022. "Competitiveness and upgrading in global value chains: A multiple-country analysis of the wooden furniture industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Daniel Plugge & Thomas Baldauf & Michael Köhl, 2013. "The global climate change mitigation strategy REDD: monitoring costs and uncertainties jeopardize economic benefits," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 247-259, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasin, M. & Ahmad, S. & Roohi, R. & Majeed, R. & Hussain, S. A. & Rehan, A & Ahmad, M. M., 2004. "Assessment of hydrological potential for installation of dugwells: development of practical methodology," IWMI Books, Reports H036186, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Steele, J. G. & Ramdin, H. N., 1971. "Soil Resources Of Guyana," 9th Annual Meeting, 1971, Georgetown, Guyana 263363, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    3. Frederick W. Cubbage & Christopher D. Risbrudt & Thomas M. Skinner, 1987. "Evaluating Public Forestry Assistance Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 33-49, February.
    4. Ollinger, Michael & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 1998. "Innovation and Regulation in the Pesticide Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 15-27, April.
    5. Yasin, M. & Ahmad, S. & Ahmad, M. M. & Akbar, G. & Khan, Z., 2004. "Dugwell as an option of skimming well," IWMI Books, Reports H036179, International Water Management Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    forest monitoring; Forest Identity; forest carbon; remote sensing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-09-29.pdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Webmaster to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.