IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Взаимодействие Университетских Коллективов России И Китая При Разработке Проектов Модернизации Аграрной Экономики: Методология, Направления Исследований, Сравнение Потенциалов, Социально-Культурные Измерения Сельских Территорий
[Interaction of university teams in Russia and China in the development of the project for the modernization of the agrarian economy: methodology, research areas, comparison of potentials, socio-cultural dimensions of rural areas]



The article discusses the interaction of university teams in Russia and China in the development of a project to modernize the agrarian economy. The methodological aspects, directions of work, the comparison of potentials, the approaches to socio-cultural dimensions in the agrarian economy are examined. The work is viewed as a step-by-step process: from establishing interaction between participants and coordinating the basic provisions of the research methodology to determining the directions that together form the content of the project "Comparison of modernization processes in agriculture in Russia and China." For the comparability of the dynamics of modernization processes, a list of directions and a system of indicators has been developed, and a methodology for socio-cultural measurements of rural areas is given.

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS

  1. Hidrobo, Melissa & Hoddinott, John & Peterman, Amber & Margolies, Amy & Moreira, Vanessa, 2014. "Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 144-156.
  2. Стукач Виктор Федорович, 2011. "Инфраструктура Производственных Услуг: Новые Тенденции," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 4, pages 133-142.
  3. Häring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2009. "Organic farming policy development in the EU: What can multi-stakeholder processes contribute?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 265-272, June.
  4. Alchian, Armen A. & Demsetz, Harold, 1973. "The Property Right Paradigm," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(01), pages 16-27, March.
  5. Stukach, Victor & Pomogaev, Vitaly & Zinich, Alla & Nflejta, Anicin, 2015. "Protección Social: Infraestructura Regional de Distribución de Asistencia Alimentaria," MPRA Paper 81523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2017.
  6. Polterovich, Victor, 2011. "Региональные институты модернизации (Regional'nye instituty modernizatsii)
    [Regional Institutions of Modernization]
    ," MPRA Paper 42170, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  7. John J. Wallis & Douglass North, 1986. "Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970," NBER Chapters,in: Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, pages 95-162 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

Cited by:

  1. Аникина, Надежда & Стукач, Виктор, 2012. "Неформальные Институты Трансакционного Сектора Региона: Агроэкономический Аспект
    [Informal institutions transaction sector of the region: the agro-economic aspect]
    ," MPRA Paper 74171, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2016.

More about this item


Modernization of agriculture; agriculture in Russia; agriculture in China; parameters for comparing the potential of the agrarian economy; socio-cultural dimensions; G.Hofstede;

JEL classification:

  • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
  • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
  • P2 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies

NEP fields

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


Access and download statistics


All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:80225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: .

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.