IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/79125.html

Управление Технологическим Развитием Сельского Хозяйства: Ресурсы Для Развития, Институциональная Среда, Государственное Регулирование, Кадровый Потенциал, Рынок Инноваций, Стратегические Приоритеты
[Management of technological development of agriculture: resources for development, institutional environment, state regulation, human resources, innovation market, strategic priorities]

Author

Listed:
  • Stukach, Victor
  • Volrova, Inna

Abstract

. On the materials of the Siberian region problems of management of technological development of agriculture are considered. The evo-lutionary prerequisites, the reproduction process, organizational and economic problems, the institutional environment, state regulation in the sphere of technological development management are investigated. Innovative policy, resource-target approach in ensuring technological efficiency of production, assessment of technical, technological equipment, personnel potential, technological efficiency of production resources use, infrastructure of innovation market are considered. Strategic priorities, the practice of forsight research in the construction of scenarios for development in the medium and long term are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stukach, Victor & Volrova, Inna, 2017. "Управление Технологическим Развитием Сельского Хозяйства: Ресурсы Для Развития, Институциональная Среда, Государственное Регулирование, Кадровый Потенциал, Рынок Инноваций, Стратегические Приоритеты [Management of technological development of agri," MPRA Paper 79125, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:79125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79125/7/MPRA_paper_79125.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winiecki, Jan, 1994. "Shaping the Institutional Infrastructure," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(1), pages 66-78, January.
    2. Rey Koslowski, 1992. "Market Institutions, East European Reform, and Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 673-705, September.
    3. Häring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2009. "Organic farming policy development in the EU: What can multi-stakeholder processes contribute?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 265-272, June.
    4. Solomon Asfaw & Benjamin Davis & Josh Dewbre & Sudhanshu Handa & Paul Winters, 2014. "Cash Transfer Programme, Productive Activities and Labour Supply: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment in Kenya," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 1172-1196, August.
    5. Stukach, Victor & Shumakova, Oksana & Anicina, Nadejda & Pomogaev, Vitaly, 2016. "Influence on Transaction Costs and Market Barriers of Organizational Behaviour and Culture of the Rural Population: Analysis and Research Practice," MPRA Paper 83326, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    6. Janice Peterson, 2002. "The TANF Reauthorization Debate: Key Welfare Reform Issues and Concerns," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 431-439, June.
    7. Janice Peterson, 2000. "Welfare Reform and Inequality: The TANF and UI Programs," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 517-526, June.
    8. Viktor Stukach, 2011. "Infrastructure of manufacturing services: new trends," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 133-142.
    9. Stukach, Victor & Pomogaev, Vitaly & Zinich, Alla & Nflejta, Anicin, 2015. "Protección Social: Infraestructura Regional de Distribución de Asistencia Alimentaria," MPRA Paper 81523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natali, Starovoytova & Victor, Stukach, 2017. "Продовольственное Обеспечение Нуждающихся: Концепция Социально Ориентированного Сельского Хозяйства, Институциональная Среда Продовольственной Помощи Населению, Потенциал Органического Земледелия, Пилотные Проекты [Food provision requiring: the co," MPRA Paper 81808, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2017.
    2. Stukach, Victor & Grishaev, Egor, 2008. "Агропродовольственный Рынок Региона: Классификация Институтов, Административные Барьеры, Трансакционные Издержки, Неэффективные Посредники [The region's agro-food market: the classification of institutions, administrative barriers, transaction cos," MPRA Paper 79290, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2017.
    3. Стукач Виктор Федорович, 2011. "Инфраструктура Производственных Услуг: Новые Тенденции," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 4, pages 133-142.
    4. Виктор, Стукач & Надежда, Аникина, 2016. "Влияние Организационной Культуры На Уровень Трансакционных Издержек В Аграрной Экономике [Organizational culture influences the level of transaction costs in the agrarian economy]," MPRA Paper 73204, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2016.
    5. Stukach, Victor & Pomogaev, Vitaly & Zinich, Alla & Nflejta, Anicin, 2015. "Protección Social: Infraestructura Regional de Distribución de Asistencia Alimentaria," MPRA Paper 81523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2017.
    6. Стукач, Виктор & Помогаев, Виталий & Старовойтова, Наталья & Зинич, Алла, 2016. "Инфраструктура Распределения Продовольственной Помощи В Регионе [Infrastructure Distribution Of Food Aid In The Region]," MPRA Paper 73086, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Axelsen, Dan & Underwood, Daniel A. & Friesner, Dan, 2009. "Cultural filtering in the hiring process and its relationship to welfare reform," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 495-508, June.
    8. Stukach, Victor, 2013. "Применение Почвозащитных Технологий В Регионах, Подверженных Ветровой Эрозии: Механизмы Мотивации Собственников Земли [Application of soil protection technologies in regions prone to wind erosion: mechanisms for motivating landowners]," MPRA Paper 77730, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2017.
    9. Tancrède Voituriez, 2020. "The quest for green welfare state in developing countries," Working Papers hal-02876972, HAL.
    10. Philippe DULBECCO, 2000. "The Dynamics of the Institutional Change and the Market Economy: An Austrian Analysis," Working Papers 200010, CERDI.
    11. Heinrich, Carolyn J. & Knowles, Matthew T., 2020. "A fine predicament: Conditioning, compliance and consequences in a labeled cash transfer program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Hagemejer, Jan & Tyrowicz, Joanna, . "Wykorzystanie nowego instrumentu do lokalnego pomiaru wpływu prywatyzacji na wyniki przedsiębiorstw," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2020(3).
    13. Xiuling Ding & Qian Lu & Lipeng Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Hua Li, 2023. "Does Labor Transfer Improve Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw from Farming?—A Bivariate Probit Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Ghulam Mustafa, 2022. "Weather Shocks, Unconditional Cash Transfers and Household Food Outcomes," PIDE-Working Papers 2022:8, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    15. Sudhanshu Handa & Silvio Daidone & Amber Peterman & Benjamin Davis & Audrey Pereira & Tia Palermo & Jennifer Yablonski, 2018. "Myth-Busting? Confronting Six Common Perceptions about Unconditional Cash Transfers as a Poverty Reduction Strategy in Africa," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(2), pages 259-298.
    16. d'Agostino, Giorgio & Scarlato, Margherita, 2016. "Gender Inequality in the South African Labour Market: the Impact of the Child Support Grant," MPRA Paper 72523, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Robert Dimand, 2003. "On Limiting the Domain of Inequality: The Legacy of James Tobin," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 559-564, Fall.
    18. Cooper, Jan E. & Benmarhnia, Tarik & Koski, Alissa & King, Nicholas B., 2020. "Cash transfer programs have differential effects on health: A review of the literature from low and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    19. Prabhat Kishore & Pratap S. Birthal, 2024. "The impact of direct benefit transfers for micro-irrigation on farm performance: Evidence from India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17995-18015, July.
    20. Scarlato, Margherita & D'Agostino, Giorgio, 2016. "The political economy of cash transfers: a comparative analysis of Latin American and sub-Saharan African experiences," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:79125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.