IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/79927.html

Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A Calibrated Qualitative Response Estimation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erard, Brian

Abstract

Often providers of a program or a service have detailed information about their clients, but only very limited information about potential clients. Likewise, ecologists frequently have extensive knowledge regarding habitats where a given animal or plant species is known to be present, but they lack comparable information on habitats where they are certain not to be present. In epidemiology, comprehensive information is routinely collected about patients who have been diagnosed with a given disease; however, commensurate information may not be available for individuals who are known to be free of the disease. While it may be highly beneficial to learn about the determinants of participation (in a program or service) or presence (in a habitat or of a disease), the lack of a comparable sample of observations on subjects that are not participants (or that are non-present) precludes the application of standard qualitative response models, such as logit or probit. In this paper, we present some new qualitative response estimators that can be applied by combining information from a primary sample of participants with a general sample from the overall population. Our new estimators rival the best existing estimators for use control sampling. Furthermore, these new estimators can be applied to stratified samples even when the stratification criteria are unknown. The estimators are also readily generalized to accommodate polychotomous response problems. Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A Calibrated Qualitative Response Estimation Approach. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317731280_Modeling_Qualitative_Outcomes_by_Supplementing_Participant_Data_with_General_Population_Data_A_Calibrated_Qualitative_Response_Estimation_Approach [accessed Jun 28, 2017].

Suggested Citation

  • Erard, Brian, 2017. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A Calibrated Qualitative Response Estimation Approach," MPRA Paper 79927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:79927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79927/1/MPRA_paper_79927.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82082/1/MPRA_paper_82082.pdf
    File Function: revised version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Rosenman & Scott Goates & Laura Hill, 2012. "Participation in universal prevention programmes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 219-228, January.
    2. Lancaster, Tony & Imbens, Guido, 1996. "Case-control studies with contaminated controls," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-2), pages 145-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erard Brian, 2022. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A New and More Versatile Approach," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 35-53, January.
    2. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2024. "Causal Inference Under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 998-1009, July.
    3. Esmerelda A. Ramalho & Richard Smith, 2003. "Discrete choice non-response," CeMMAP working papers 07/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Erard, Brian & Langetieg, Patrick & Payne, Mark & Plumley, Alan, 2020. "Ghosts in the Income Tax Machinery," MPRA Paper 100036, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Amanda Coston & Edward H. Kennedy, 2022. "The role of the geometric mean in case-control studies," Papers 2207.09016, arXiv.org.
    6. Ashton, John & Burnett, Tim & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Known unknowns: How much financial misconduct is detected and deterred?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Nkegbe, Paul Kwame & Abdul Mumin, Yazeed, 2022. "Impact of community development initiatives and access to community markets on household food security and nutrition in Ghana," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Vincenzo Caponi & Miana Plesca, 2014. "Empirical characteristics of legal and illegal immigrants in the USA," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 27(4), pages 923-960, October.
    9. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae (Simon) Lee, 2020. "Causal inference in case-control studies," CeMMAP working papers CWP19/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Lee, Kangbok & Joo, Sunghoon & Baik, Hyeoncheol & Han, Sumin & In, Joonhwan, 2020. "Unbalanced data, type II error, and nonlinearity in predicting M&A failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 271-287.
    11. Becker, Bo & Cronqvist, Henrik & Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger, 2011. "Estimating the Effects of Large Shareholders Using a Geographic Instrument," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 907-942, August.
    12. Adam M. Kleinbaum & Toby E. Stuart & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1316-1336, October.
    13. Gill Ward & Trevor Hastie & Simon Barry & Jane Elith & John R. Leathwick, 2009. "Presence-Only Data and the EM Algorithm," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 554-563, June.
    14. Ramalho, Esmeralda A., 2007. "Binary models with misclassification in the variable of interest and nonignorable nonresponse," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 70-76, July.
    15. Masahiro Kato & Yuki Ikeda & Kentaro Baba & Takashi Imai & Ryo Inokuchi, 2025. "Learning from Double Positive and Unlabeled Data for Potential-Customer Identification," Papers 2506.00436, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    16. Esmeralda A. Ramalho & Richard J. Smith, 2013. "Discrete Choice Non-Response," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 80(1), pages 343-364.
    17. Jing Qin & Denis H. Y. Leung, 2004. "A Semi-parametric Two-component “Compound” Mixture Model and Its Application to Estimating Malaria Attributable Fractions," Working Papers 17-2004, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    18. Nail Kashaev, 2022. "Estimation of Parametric Binary Outcome Models with Degenerate Pure Choice-Based Data with Application to COVID-19-Positive Tests from British Columbia," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20225, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    19. Carvalho, Leandro S. & Soares, Rodrigo R., 2016. "Living on the edge: Youth entry, career and exit in drug-selling gangs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 77-98.
    20. Shi Chang & Rohan Singh Wilkho & Nasir Gharaibeh & Garett Sansom & Michelle Meyer & Francisco Olivera & Lei Zou, 2023. "Environmental, climatic, and situational factors influencing the probability of fatality or injury occurrence in flash flooding: a rare event logistic regression predictive model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3957-3978, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C4 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:79927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.