Utilitarian Moral Judgments Are Cognitively Too Demanding
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Shane Frederick, 2005. "Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 25-42, Fall.
- Bentham, Jeremy, 1781. "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number bentham1781.
More about this item
KeywordsCognitive Reflection; Utilitarianism; Moral Judgments;
- B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
NEP fieldsThis paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-CBE-2016-02-23 (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2016-02-23 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HPE-2016-02-23 (History & Philosophy of Economics)
- NEP-NEU-2016-02-23 (Neuroeconomics)
- NEP-UPT-2016-02-23 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:69387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .