IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/55948.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ricardo's and Malthus's common error in their conflicting theories of the value of labour

Author

Listed:
  • Meacci, Ferdinando

Abstract

ABSTRACT The controversies between Ricardo and Malthus reached a new peak when Malthus published his pamphlet The Measure of Value Stated and Illustrated and Ricardo responded by his critical Notes on Malthus’s ‘Measure of Value’ (1823 [1992]) and by a further round of correspondence with Malthus (Works, IX). The new (and final) stage of these controversies was concerned with the two authors’ conflicting theories of value and, within these theories, with the excruciating issue of the invariable measure of value. Starting from some insights provided by Malthus and Ricardo in their major or final contributions, this paper deals with a rather neglected component of their controversies, i.e. with the theory of the value of labour as distinct from the value of its products. This will be done by highlighting two sets of ambiguities which affect both Ricardo’s and Malthus’s arguments. One of these hinges on the ambiguity conveyed by the word labour in so far as this reflects the three different concepts of labour power, living labour and dead labour. The other set hinges on the different ambiguity conveyed by the word value especially when it comes to the value of labour. For this word was used in those controversies (as well as in other parts of classical theory) to convey not only the two elementary concepts of use-value and exchangeable-value but also, within the former concept, the two further concepts of the (positive) use-value of labour from the standpoint of its employer, and of the (negative) use-value (disutility) of labour from the standpoint of the labourer. The latter is the sense in which Smith’s ambiguous notion of the “value of labour to the labourer” and his related corollary of the constant “price” of labour (WN, I,V,7-8) must be understood if his system of thought (including its crucial notion of value as labour command) is to stand against Malthus’s misleading attempt to protect it from Ricardo’s criticisms. In this sense, Malthus’s attempt and Ricardo’s criticisms may be jointly regarded as a result of their common error of understanding the value of labour exclusively in the sense of its exchangeable value (which is rightly regarded by Ricardo as –normally- varying and wrongly assumed in Malthus’s Measure of Value as –strangely- constant).

Suggested Citation

  • Meacci, Ferdinando, 2014. "Ricardo's and Malthus's common error in their conflicting theories of the value of labour," MPRA Paper 55948, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:55948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55948/1/MPRA_paper_55948.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonella Stirati, 1994. "THE THEORY OF WAGES IN CLASSICAL ECONOmiCS," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 417.
    2. Peach,Terry, 1993. "Interpreting Ricardo," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521260862, March.
    3. Hueckel, Glenn, 1998. "Smith's Uniform “Toil and Trouble†: A “Vain Subtlety?â€," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 215-233, June.
    4. Mill, John Stuart, 1848. "Principles of Political Economy (III): Exchange," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, volume 3, number mill1848-3.
    5. Dorfman, Robert, 1989. "Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 153-164, Summer.
    6. Salim Rashid, 1981. "Malthus' Principles and British economic thought, 1820–1835," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 55-79, Spring.
    7. Stirati, Antonella, 1995. "Smith's Legacy and the Definitions of the Natural Wage in Ricardo," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 106-132, April.
    8. Andrew Glyn, 2006. "The corn model, gluts and surplus value," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 307-312, March.
    9. E. Paul Durrenberger, 2005. "Labour," Chapters, in: James G. Carrier (ed.),A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Mill, John Stuart, 1848. "Principles of Political Economy (I): Production," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, volume 1, number mill1848-1.
    11. Meacci, Ferdinando, 2011. "From bounties on exportation to the natural and market price of labour: Smith versus Ricardo," MPRA Paper 31153, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Terry Peach, 2009. "Adam Smith and the Labor Theory of (Real) Value: A Reconsideration," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 383-406, Summer.
    13. Smith, Adam, 1776. "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number smith1776.
    14. Costabile, Lilia, 1983. "Natural Prices, Market Prices and Effective Demand in Malthus," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 144-170, June.
    15. Nerio Naldi, 2003. "Labour employed in production and labour commanded: a Ricardian conjecture," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 547-562, July.
    16. Rankin, Stephen C, 1980. "Supply and Demand in Ricardian Price Theory: A Re-interpretation," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 241-262, July.
    17. Ferdinando Meacci, 2012. "On Adam Smith's Ambiguities on Value and Wealth," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 663-689, Winter.
    18. Hueckel, G., 1997. "Smith's Uniform "Toil and Trouble": A "Vain Subtlety"?," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1100, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    19. Garegnani, Pierangelo, 1983. "The Classical Theory of Wages and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(2), pages 309-313, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Smith; Ricardo; Malthus; value of labour;

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925
    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:55948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.