IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/117233.html

Стандартная Модель Международной Торговли И Теорема Столпера-Самуэльсона: Почему Коррупция Никак Не Влияет На Экономическое Развитие, А От Снижения Торговых Барьеров Больше Всего Страдают Олигархи
[The Standard Model and the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem: On the (Zero) Impact of Corruption on Economic Development]

Author

Listed:
  • Spirin, Victor

Abstract

The standard model of international trade demonstrates the inevitability of deindustrialization of a developing country in the face of premature liberalization of foreign trade with the developed world. This result is a consequence of elementary mathematical optimization and does not depend on the retreat from democratization and glasnost, the rule of law, or the corruption of the economic or political system. In this article, we will especially emphasize the fact that the reasons for the deindustrialization of the Russian economy should not be sought in any inefficiency of the economic system, but corruption, on the contrary, may have been the engine of economic development in historical examples. In addition, from the consideration of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, it follows that in a developing country with the liberalization of foreign trade, the oligarchs are the most affected class. The reason for this is the huge amount of capital that is completely incommensurable with the stolen, which is given to foreigners: instead of developing our own machine-building, electronic and other high-tech industries, and growing our oligarchs in these industries, all the money was given without a fight to foreign oligarchs.

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117233/1/StolperSamuelson.pdf
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no
---><---

References listed on IDEAS

as
  1. Wolfgang F. Stolper & Paul A. Samuelson, 1941. "Protection and Real Wages," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 58-73.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Most related items

These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
  1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
  2. M. Magnani, 2009. "Labor share dynamics: a survey of the theory," Economics Department Working Papers 2009-EP07, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
  3. Isaac K. Ofori, 2021. "Towards Building Shared Prosperity in Sub-Saharan Africa: How Does the Effect of Economic Integration Compare to Social Equity Policies?," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 21/045, African Governance and Development Institute..
  4. Assaf Razin & Efraim Sadka, 1996. "Fiscal Balance During Inflation, Disinflation, and Immigration: Policy Lessons," IMF Working Papers 1996/033, International Monetary Fund.
  5. Tschopp, Jeanne, 2015. "The Wage Response to Shocks: The Role of Inter-Occupational Labour Adjustment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 28-37.
  6. Larch Mario & Lechthaler Wolfgang, 2011. "Comparative Advantage and Skill-Specific Unemployment," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-58, April.
  7. Sabine Engelmann, 2014. "International trade, technological change and wage inequality in the UK economy," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 223-246, May.
  8. Ariel Burstein & Jonathan Vogel, 2011. "Factor Prices and International Trade: A Unifying Perspective," NBER Working Papers 16904, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Kis-Katos, Krisztina & Sparrow, Robert, 2015. "Poverty, labor markets and trade liberalization in Indonesia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 94-106.
  10. Michelle R. Garfinkel & Stergios Skaperdas & Constantinos Syropoulos, 2009. "International Trade and Transnational Insecurity: How Comparative Advantage and Power are Jointly Determined," Working Papers 080921, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
  11. D. Vines, 1994. "Australian Trade Liberalisation, APEC, and the GATT," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 94-11, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
  12. Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Stein, Ernesto H. & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2019. "Trade Attitudes in Latin America: Evidence from a Multi-Country Survey Experiment," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9603, Inter-American Development Bank.
  13. Dong Yang, 2025. "The Fractured Metropolis: Optimization Cutoffs, Uneven Congestion, and the Spatial Politics of Globalization," Papers 2512.05163, arXiv.org.
  14. Engelmann, Sabine, 2011. "Trade liberalisation, technical change and skill-specific unemployment," IAB-Discussion Paper 201119, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
  15. Kim, Hyeongwoo & Thompson, Henry, 2014. "Wages in a factor proportions model with energy input," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 495-501.
  16. Amiti, Mary & Cameron, Lisa, 2012. "Trade Liberalization and the Wage Skill Premium: Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 277-287.
  17. Haas, Levi & Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus R., 2019. "International Trade: Smarten up to talk the talk," MPRA Paper 99096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  18. Antonio Filippin & Luca Nunziata, 2019. "Monetary effects of inequality: lessons from the euro experiment," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(2), pages 99-124, June.
  19. Louise Séguin Dulude, 1986. "Quelques réflexions sur la complémentarité des approches marginaliste et managériale," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 62(2), pages 157-165.
  20. Obeng, Camara Kwasi, 2014. "Impact of import liberalisation on poverty: a dynamic computable general equilibrium and microsimulation analysis for Ghana," MPRA Paper 58182, University Library of Munich, Germany.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

JEL classification:

  • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization
  • F62 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Macroeconomic Impacts
  • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development

NEP fields

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:117233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.