IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/107277.html

Teaching introductory economics to students of different majors: Challenges and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Islam, Shahidul
  • Manaloor, Varghese

Abstract

Introductory economics courses have a diverse pool of students with varied objectives. The programs offering introductory economics also have specific objectives in mind. This variation deserves attention to find appropriate content, teaching method and resources. This paper explores (i) the appropriateness of content, breadth and depth of economic concept provided to different disciplines, (ii) mode of delivery and teaching techniques with varying objectives and (iii) the suitability of resource materials. It is concluded that different programs need to adapt the content and teaching techniques to satisfy student needs, and a collaborative approach led by the economics instructor would be the way to go.

Suggested Citation

  • Islam, Shahidul & Manaloor, Varghese, 2011. "Teaching introductory economics to students of different majors: Challenges and opportunities," MPRA Paper 107277, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:107277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107277/1/MPRA_paper_107277.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Griffin Smith, 2007. "Case Studies on Location: Taking to the Field in Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 308-317, July.
    2. Alex Van Der Merwe, 2006. "Identifying Some Constraints In First Year Economics Teaching And Learning At A Typical South African University Of Technology," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 74(1), pages 150-159, March.
    3. W. Doyle Smith, 2002. "Applying Angelo's Teacher's Dozen to Undergraduate Introductory Economics Classes: A Call for Greater Interactive Learning," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 28(4), pages 539-549, Fall.
    4. Kim Hawtrey, 2007. "Using Experiential Learning Techniques," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 143-152, April.
    5. Jill L. Caviglia-Harris, 2003. "Introducing Undergraduates to Economics in an Interdisciplinary Setting," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 195-203, January.
    6. Derek Pyne, 2007. "Does the Choice of Introductory Microeconomics Textbook Matter?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 279-296, July.
    7. Robert P. Parks, 1999. "Macro Principles, PowerPoint, and the Internet: Four Years of the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 200-209, January.
    8. David M. Mitchell, 2008. "An Examination of the Impact that Classroom Based Experiments have on Learning Economic Concepts," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 21-34.
    9. Mark Dickie, 2006. "Do Classroom Experiments Increase Learning in Introductory Microeconomics?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 267-288, July.
    10. Colander, David, 2003. "The Aging of an Economist," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 157-176, June.
    11. James Sawler, 2007. "A Classroom Demonstration for Teaching Network Effects," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 153-159, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nilss Olekalns, 2002. "The Teaching of First Year Economics in Australian Universities," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 848, The University of Melbourne.
    2. Gerald Eisenkopf & Pascal A. Sulser, 2016. "Randomized controlled trial of teaching methods: Do classroom experiments improve economic education in high schools?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 211-225, July.
    3. Berning, Joshua P., "undated". "Using self-reported data collection and analysis to facilitate student learning: A case study," 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas 162482, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Lin, Tin-Chun, 2024. "Can instruction in consumer choice theory in introduction to microeconomics benefit student learning in upper-level economics courses? The example of public finance," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Odell, Kathleen E., 2018. "Team-based learning and student performance: Preliminary evidence from a principles of macroeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 44-58.
    6. Sherry Jensen, 2016. "Motivating the study of international trade: A classroom activity," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 311-316, October.
    7. Karla Borja & Suzanne Dieringer, 2023. "Telling My Story: Applying Storytelling to Complex Economic Data," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 328-348, June.
    8. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2011. "Kaderschmieden der Wirtschaft und/oder Universitäten? Der Auftrag der Wirtschaftsuniversitäten und –fakultäten im 21. Jahrhundert," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 12(3), pages 317-337, August.
    9. Natalia Maloshonok, 2016. "How Using the Internet and Multimedia Technology in the Learning Process Correlates with Student Engagement," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 59-83.
    10. Bordo, Michael & Istrefi, Klodiana, 2023. "Perceived FOMC: The making of hawks, doves and swingers," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 125-143.
    11. William B. Walstad & Jamie Wagner, 2016. "The disaggregation of value-added test scores to assess learning outcomes in economics courses," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 121-131, April.
    12. Sheng Guo & Jungmin Lee, 2011. "Keeping Up With Fashion: Recent Trends in the Subfields of Study of Doctoral Students in Economics," Working Papers 1101, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    13. Grace Finley & Charles Holt & Emily Snow, 2019. "The welfare costs of price controls and rent seeking in a class experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(3), pages 753-771, September.
    14. Scott Alan CARSON, 2018. "Lanny Ebenstein, Chicagonomics: The Evolution of Chicago Free Market Economics," Journal of Economic and Social Thought, KSP Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 111-114, March.
    15. Gao, Guanlin, 2021. "Baking for economics and the community–An experiential learning project for the principles of microeconomics class," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    16. Jonathan Guest, 2015. "Reflections on ten years of using economics games and experiments in teaching," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1115619-111, December.
    17. Bosley, Stacie, 2016. "Student-crafted experiments “from the ground up”," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 1-7.
    18. Hendrik P. van Dalen & Kène Henkens, 2012. "What is on a Demographer’s Mind?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(16), pages 363-408.
    19. Jens Schubert, 2023. "Using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism to Teach Willingness to Pay and Consumer Surplus," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    20. Spahn Peter, 2009. "The New Keynesian Microfoundation of Macroeconomics," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 60(3), pages 181-203, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:107277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.