IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/5kd4v_v1.html

The effect of the wine critic's 100 points in the digital age: the case of Spain

Author

Listed:
  • González, Antonio Blanco
  • del Campo Villares, José Luis

Abstract

In any product whose evaluation involves taste factors, subjectivity is a determining factor. For this reason, a rating or evaluation system is sometimes proposed to help potential consumers navigate different decision-making alternatives. In recent decades, the wine sector has been characterized by the use of ratings issued by specialized critics. This access channel serves as a means of knowledge for potential customers who have not physically seen the product and who, upon seeing the ratings received by these critics, see them as an influential factor in their final decision-making. Making a decision based on the numerical rating given by a wine reviewer after tasting a wine, where the wine is awarded the maximum score (100 points), can have a positive influence on the consumer's decision. However, not all critics, and consequently their ratings, have the same relevance to the final buyer. This work designed a methodology and proposed a formulation that objectively assesses the real influence of a wine's highest rating by a critic, based on its increased online visibility, search volume, and references in digital media. Several indicators were designed to compare the influence of different critics' scores over a time horizon of one to four weeks after a wine received its highest rating. The study examined whether the highest rating awarded by a specialized wine reviewer has the same impact in all cases or whether it depends on the critic. It also determined the duration of its influence over time.

Suggested Citation

  • González, Antonio Blanco & del Campo Villares, José Luis, 2026. "The effect of the wine critic's 100 points in the digital age: the case of Spain," SocArXiv 5kd4v_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:5kd4v_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/5kd4v_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/697a0c908f591751918ad65b/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/5kd4v_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rao, Akshay R & Bergen, Mark E, 1992. "Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers' Lack of Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 412-423, December.
    2. Orth, U.R. & Krska, P., 2001. "Quality Signals In Wine Marketing: The Role Of Exhibition Awards," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13.
    3. Richard Friberg & Erik Grönqvist, 2012. "Do Expert Reviews Affect the Demand for Wine?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pages 193-211, January.
    4. Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho, 2021. "Contributions from Literature for Understanding Wine Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Villas-Boas, Sofia B, 2020. "Reduced Form Evidence on Belief Updating Under Asymmetric Information," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt08c456vk, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Mayank Aggarwal & Anindya S. Chakrabarti & Chirantan Chatterjee, 2023. "Movies, stigma and choice: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 1019-1039, May.
    3. Carlson, Keith & Kopalle, Praveen K. & Riddell, Allen & Rockmore, Daniel & Vana, Prasad, 2023. "Complementing human effort in online reviews: A deep learning approach to automatic content generation and review synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 54-74.
    4. Paulo Duarte Silveira, 2019. "The Relevance of Shopper Marketing Touchpoints: An Empirical Study on Wine Choice in Restaurants," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 35-48.
    5. Montserrat Boronat-Navarro & José A. Pérez-Aranda, 2020. "Analyzing Willingness to Pay More to Stay in a Sustainable Hotel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Richard Friberg & Mark Sanctuary, 2017. "The Effect of Retail Distribution on Sales of Alcoholic Beverages," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 626-641, July.
    7. Sojin Jung & Byoungho Ellie Jin, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Slow fashion branding: understanding what consumers value most," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 141-149, March.
    8. Ralf Dewenter & Ulrich Heimeshoff & Tobias Thomas, 2016. "Media Coverage and Car Manufacturers' Sales," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 976-982.
    9. Daniel Murphy, 2019. "Increasing clicks through advanced targeting: Applying the third-party seal model to airline advertising," Post-Print hal-02458480, HAL.
    10. Lu, Qiang (Steven) & Yang, Yupin & Yuksel, Ulku, 2015. "The impact of a new online channel: An empirical study," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 136-155.
    11. Bernd Frick & Clarissa Laura Maria Spiess Bru & Daniel Kaimann, 2023. "Are Women (Really) More Lenient? Gender Differences in Expert Evaluations," Working Papers Dissertations 106, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    12. Michela Ponzo & Vincenzo Scoppa, 2015. "Experts’ awards and economic success: evidence from an Italian literary prize," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(4), pages 341-367, November.
    13. Karlis Rokpelnis & Peter Ho & Gong Cheng & Heng Zhao, 2018. "Consumer Perceptions of the Commodification and Related Conservation of Traditional Indigenous Naxi Forest Products as Credence Goods (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Rokpelnis, Karlis & Ho, Peter & Cheng, Gong & Zhao, Heng, 2018. "Consumer perceptions of the commodification and related conservation of traditional indigenous Naxi forest products as credence goods (China)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91498, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Paul A. Pavlou & Angelika Dimoka, 2006. "The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 392-414, December.
    16. Livat, Florine & Alston, Julian M. & Cardebat, Jean-Marie, 2019. "Do denominations of origin provide useful quality signals? The case of Bordeaux wines," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 518-532.
    17. Ralf Dewenter & Ulrich Heimeshoff, 2015. "Do expert reviews really drive demand? Evidence from a German car magazine," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(14), pages 1150-1153, September.
    18. W. Verbeke & I. Vermeir & Z. Pieniak & K. Bruns, 2005. "Consumers quality perception as a basis for fish market segmentation in Belgium," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/351, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    19. Mukherji, Ananda & Mukherji, Jyotsna & Dibrell, Clay & Francis, John D., 2013. "Overbidding in cross-border acquisitions: Misperceptions in assessing and valuing knowledge," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 39-46.
    20. Eline Jongmans & Alain Jolibert & Julie Irwin, 2014. "Toujours plus, toujours mieux ? Effet contre-intuitif de l'évaluation des attributs environnementaux du produit par le consommateur," Post-Print halshs-01185784, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:5kd4v_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.