IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/kfg6m.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UGII – University Gender Inequality Index. A proposal from the University of Bologna

Author

Listed:
  • Mignoli, Gian Piero
  • Siboni, Benedetta Prof.

    (University of Bologna)

  • Rignanese, Pasqua
  • Valentini, Camilla
  • Toschi, Tullia Gallina

Abstract

While universities have been considered gender neutral, being organisations in which merit should prevail, several reports denounce the under-representation of women worldwide. According to the European Union this current under-representation results in a waste of female talent and, thus, prevents the achievement of the European Research Area’s objective of Excellence in Research. Several gender indexes have been proposed to measure “gender equality” in countries, while only one addresses university. However, it primarily focuses on academics, thus neglecting non-academic staff and students. This paper aims to propose a new index formulated to measure and rank “gender inequality” at universities: the University Gender Inequality Index (UGII). This index results from the determination of 9 domains and 25 aspects measured by 25 indicators, considering academic staff, technical-administrative staff and students. Domains include both endogenous and exogenous aspects, but UGII builds on endogenous ones that universities can directly influence. All indicators come from existing databases, thus assuring its replicability over different universities as well as its sustainability. Using index numbers, UGII measures the distance between the situation of gender inequality performed by the university and the maximum level of inequality that can be recorded with regard to each domain. This gives the “real” situation of domains with male or female advantage, thus indicating directions in which to intervene to university governing bodies. Finally, synthesising index numbers calculated with reference to each domains, UGII gives a final score of the overall situation of gender inequality at the university, allowing comparisons among different time horizons and with other universities. This paper illustrates the methodology to calculate the UGII and its application with regards to the University of Bologna, and tests it for significance and completeness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mignoli, Gian Piero & Siboni, Benedetta Prof. & Rignanese, Pasqua & Valentini, Camilla & Toschi, Tullia Gallina, 2018. "UGII – University Gender Inequality Index. A proposal from the University of Bologna," OSF Preprints kfg6m, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:kfg6m
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/kfg6m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5b6db6b590a7e0001a85d3f4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/kfg6m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosalia Castellano & Antonella Rocca, 2014. "Gender gap and labour market participation," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 345-367, May.
    2. Rosalia Castellano & Antonella Rocca, 2015. "Assessing the gender gap in labour market index: volatility of results and reliability," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 749-772, August.
    3. Monica Bozzano, 2014. "Assessing Gender Inequality among Italian Regions: The Italian Gender Gap Index," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, issue 1, pages 255-300, January-M.
    4. Matthew RE Symonds & Neil J Gemmell & Tamsin L Braisher & Kylie L Gorringe & Mark A Elgar, 2006. "Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natividad Blasco & Isabel Brusca & Margarita Labrador, 2019. "Assessing Sustainability and Its Performance Implications: An Empirical Analysis in Spanish Public Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosalia Castellano & Antonella Rocca, 2017. "The dynamic of the gender gap in the European labour market in the years of economic crisis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1337-1357, May.
    2. Rosalia CASTELLANO & Antonella ROCCA, 2018. "Gender disparities in European labour markets: A comparison of conditions for men and women in paid employment," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(4), pages 589-608, December.
    3. Helena Corrales-Herrero & Beatriz Rodriguez-Prado, 2021. "Measuring Youth Living Conditions in Europe: A Multidimensional Cross-Country Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 1077-1117, June.
    4. Bottazzi, Laura & Lusardi, Annamaria, 2021. "Stereotypes in financial literacy: Evidence from PISA," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Bozzano, Monica, 2017. "On the historical roots of women's empowerment across Italian provinces: religion or family culture?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 24-46.
    6. Josh Yamamoto & Eitan Frachtenberg, 2022. "Gender Differences in Collaboration Patterns in Computer Science," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Graziella Bertocchi & Monica Bozzano, 2015. "Family Structure and the Education Gender Gap: Evidence from Italian Provinces," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 61(1), pages 263-300.
    8. Guenther, Isabel & Grosse, Melanie & Klasen, Stephan, 2014. "Attracting Attentive Academics. Paper, Person or Place?," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100392, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Feichtinger, G. & Grass, D. & Kort, P.M., 2019. "Optimal scientific production over the life cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Peter van den Besselaar & Ulf Sandström, 2016. "Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 143-162, January.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8741 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Sorin M. S. Krammer & Peter Dahlin & Jonathan P. Doh & Kristina Potočnik, 2024. "Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1654-1682, June.
    13. Gustav Feichtinger & Dieter Grass & Maria Winkler-Dworak, 2020. "The mathematics of ageing:," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 371-399, June.
    14. Michał Krawczyk & Magdalena Smyk, 2015. "Gender, beauty and support networks in academia: evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 2015-43, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    15. Francisco J. Beltrán Tapia & Gabriele Cappelli, 2024. "Missing girls in Liberal Italy, 1861–1921," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 77(1), pages 185-211, February.
    16. Tahmooresnejad, Leila & Turkina, Ekaterina, 2022. "Female inventors over time: Factors affecting female Inventors’ innovation performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    17. Hajar Sotudeh & Nahid Khoshian, 2014. "Gender differences in science: the case of scientific productivity in Nano Science & Technology during 2005–2007," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 457-472, January.
    18. Abramo, Giovanni & Aksnes, Dag W. & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2021. "Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    19. repec:plo:pone00:0201725 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. K. C. Garg & S. Kumar, 2014. "Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1771-1783, March.
    21. repec:osf:osfxxx:kfg6m_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Lisa Geraci & Steve Balsis & Alexander J. Busch Busch, 2015. "Gender and the h index in psychology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2023-2034, December.
    23. Danielle H. Lee, 2019. "Predicting the research performance of early career scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1481-1504, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:kfg6m. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.