IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/6tgqs.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lost in transition: The decline of LPG usage and the charcoal renaissance in urban Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Rose, Julian

    (RWI - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research)

  • Ankel-Peters, Jörg
  • Hodel, Hanna
  • Sall, Medoune
  • Bensch, Gunther

Abstract

Claims for removing fossil fuel subsidies in the Global South are based on climate and equity concerns, but they can be at odds with improving access to Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a clean cooking fuel. We examine the case of urban Senegal where LPG usage rates were among the highest in sub-Saharan Africa in the late 2000s. Using Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, we show that LPG usage declined sharply following the removal of subsidies in 2009. Counterintuitively, the decline was not reversed when falling world market prices led to a local price decrease. To explore this puzzle, we use detailed cooking data from surveys we conducted in 2009 and 2019. We find that households change to charcoal after the subsidy removal, but they increasingly use newly promoted energy-efficient charcoal stoves. These stoves make charcoal cooking cheaper and hence the switch back to LPG less attractive. Our results underscore that the energy transition of the poor is highly price responsive – an important insight not only for the debate about fossil fuel subsidies but also carbon taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose, Julian & Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Hodel, Hanna & Sall, Medoune & Bensch, Gunther, 2024. "Lost in transition: The decline of LPG usage and the charcoal renaissance in urban Senegal," OSF Preprints 6tgqs, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6tgqs
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6tgqs
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66126937bba39a29ab729ef8/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6tgqs?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6tgqs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.