IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/mediar/9d6et.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Governable Spaces: A Feminist Architecture for Platform Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Schneider, Nathan

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

Abstract

Feminist tradition reveals with particular clarity how the online economy has contrived to be both apparently open and persistently unaccountable. Diverse feminist critiques amount to an overlapping insistence that the systems that organize our technology should be governable by the people who rely on them. This article extrapolates from feminist insights and experiences toward a policy agenda for vexing challenges in three domains of the online economy: social-media communities, platform-mediated work, and network infrastructure. The agenda calls for crafting “governable spaces” through diverse and accountable forms of user participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Schneider, Nathan, 2022. "Governable Spaces: A Feminist Architecture for Platform Policy," MediArXiv 9d6et, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:mediar:9d6et
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9d6et
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6239ea75e6b58b07d7d6bd65/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9d6et?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casarosa, Federica, 2020. "Transnational collective actions for cross-border data protection violations," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14.
    2. Simon Jäger & Shakked Noy & Benjamin Schoefer, 2022. "What Does Codetermination Do?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(4), pages 857-890, August.
    3. Francesca MARTINELLI & Samuele BOZZONI & Simone CAROLI & Francesca TAMASCELLI & Giuseppe GUERINI, 2019. "Platform Cooperativism in Italy and in Europe," CIRIEC Working Papers 1927, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    4. Schneider, Nathan & Mannan, Morshed, 2020. "Exit to Community: Strategies for Multi-Stakeholder Ownership in the Platform Economy," OSF Preprints nmyxp, Center for Open Science.
    5. Johnston, Hannah & Land-Kazlauskas, Chris., 2018. "Organizing on-demand representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy," ILO Working Papers 994981993502676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    2. Mayo Fuster Morell & Ricard Espelt & Enric Senabre Hidalgo, 2021. "Data for Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections between Platform Models and Sustainable Development Goals," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Pierre Bachas & Matthew Fisher-Post & Anders Jensen & Gabriel Zucman, 2022. "Globalization and Factor Income Taxation," World Inequality Lab Working Papers halshs-03693211, HAL.
    4. Niki Panteli & Andriana Rapti & Dora Scholarios, 2020. "‘If He Just Knew Who We Were’: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 476-494, June.
    5. Gernot Grabher & Erwin van Tuijl, 2020. "Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 1005-1016, August.
    6. Ciotti, Fabrizio & Hornuf, Lars & Stenzhorn, Eliza, 2021. "Lock-In Effects in Online Labor Markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2021014, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. -, 2021. "Employment Situation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Decent work for platform workers in Latin America," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 46956 edited by Eclac, November.
    8. Marie Nilsen & Trond Kongsvik & Stian Antonsen, 2022. "Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Biancardi, Daniele & Lucifora, Claudio & Origo, Federica, 2022. "Short-time work and unionization," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Burdin, Gabriel & Kato, Takao, 2021. "Complementarity in Employee Participation Systems: International Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 14694, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Carlo Vercellone & Francesco Brancaccio & Alfonso Giuliani & Federico Puletti & Giulia Rocchi & Pierluigi Vattimo, 2018. "Data-driven disruptive commons-based models," Working Papers halshs-01952141, HAL.
    12. Berde, Éva, 2018. "Uber és taxi egymás mellett - új piaci modellek hagyományos árdiszkriminációval [Uber and taxi firms side by side. The Ublyft" business model with traditional price discrimination]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 650-666.
    13. Schultheiss, Tobias & Pfister, Curdin & Gnehm, Ann-Sophie & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2023. "Education expansion and high-skill job opportunities for workers: Does a rising tide lift all boats?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Elena M Auer & Tara S Behrend & Andrew B Collmus & Richard N Landers & Ahleah F Miles, 2021. "Pay for performance, satisfaction and retention in longitudinal crowdsourced research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Serpil ÇİĞDEM, 2019. "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(77), pages 157-199, December.
    16. Rani Uma & Furrer Marianne, 2019. "On-Demand Digital Economy: Can Experience Ensure Work and Income Security for Microtask Workers?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 239(3), pages 565-597, June.
    17. Kathryn L. Combs & Monica E. Hartmann & Joseph L. Kreitzer, 2023. "An International Exercise to Increase Awareness of How Market, Political, and Cultural Institutions Affect Economic Activity," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 54-77, January.
    18. Gali Racabi, 2021. "Effects of City–State Relations on Labor Relations: The Case of Uber," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(5), pages 1155-1178, October.
    19. Alex Veen & Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods, 2020. "Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 388-406, June.
    20. Azzellini, Dario & Greer, Ian & Umney, Charles, 2019. "Limits of the platform economy: Digitalization and marketization in live music," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 154, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:mediar:9d6et. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mediarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.